Students’ perspectives on the 4/3/2 technique and self-assessment to improve English speaking fluency

Jardel Coutinho dos Santos, María Rossana Ramírez-Avila

Abstract


Understanding students’ perspectives and differentiating classroom practices based on student needs are considered effective educators’ primary purposes in improving the foreign language learning process. How teachers conduct and teach their classes significantly affects how students cope with their learning. For this reason, this phenomenological study aimed to identify the perspectives among 12 Ecuadorian ninth graders on the 4/3/2 technique and self-assessment used to improve their English-speaking fluency during a five-week class. The data were collected through interviews and visual narratives and analyzed using grounded theory. The results of the study show that the 4/3/2 technique presented three categories (I learned because I repeated; I increased my speaking speed and decreased word repetitions; I got nervous when I had to speak faster). Self-assessment presented two categories (I learned from my mistakes; We were aware of our progress, which motivated us). Thus, this study has shown the importance of identifying students’ perspectives on the two learning strategies used in class. By doing this, teachers can select the appropriate technique for that specific learning context based on the students’ perceptions and foreign language theories. Further research is still necessary for the Ecuadorian context to explore how students’ perspective on the teachers’ learning methodologies affect them, especially their emotions.


Keywords


4/3/2 technique; English as a foreign language; self-assessment; speaking fluency; students’ perspectives

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alarcão, I. (2002). Escola reflexiva e desenvolvimento institucional: Que novas funções supervisivas? [Reflective school and institutional development: What are the new supervisory functions?]. In J. Oliveira-Formosinho (Ed.), A supervisão na formação de professores (pp. 217-238). Porto Editora.

Alibakhshi, G., & Sarani, A. (2014). Self-assessment impact on EFL learners’ speaking fluency and accuracy: Does level of proficiency matter? Teaching English Language, 8(2), 119-143.

Andrade, H., & Du, Y. (2007). Student responses to criteria-referenced self-assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(2), 159-181. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930600801928

Angelo, T. A., & Cross, K. P. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Anthony, G. (1996). Active learning in a constructivist framework. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 31(4), 349-369. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00369153

Arcara, G., & Bambini, V. (2016). A test for the Assessment of Pragmatic Abilities and Cognitive Substrates (APACS): Normative data and psychometric properties. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(70), 212-224. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00070

Asri, A., & Muhtar, A. (2013). The effect of 4/3/2 technique on the students’ oral fluency at SMAN 2 Malang [Bachelor thesis, Universitas Negeri Malang]. Repositori Universitas Negeri Malang. http://repository.um.ac.id/id/eprint/245073

Baber, H. (2020). Determinants of students’ perceived learning outcome and satisfaction in online learning during the pandemic of COVID-19. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 7(3), 285-292. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2020.73.285.292

Beausaert, S. A. J., Segers, M. S. R., & Wiltink, D. P. A. (2013). The influence of teachers’ teaching approaches on students’ learning approaches: The student perspective. Educational Research, 55(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2013.767022

Bloemert, J., Paran, A., Jansen, E., & van de Grift, W. (2017). Students’ perspective on the benefits of EFL literature education. The Language Learning Journal, 47(3), 371-384. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2017.1298149

Boers, F. (2014). A reappraisal of the 4/3/2 activity. RELC Journal, 45(3), 221-235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688214546964

Bøhn, H. (2015). Assessing spoken EFL without a common rating scale: Norwegian EFL teachers’ conceptions of construct. SAGE Open, 5(4), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015621956

Boud, D. (1995). Enhancing learning through self-assessment (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315041520

Brown, A. V. (2009). Students’ and teachers’ perceptions of effective foreign language teaching: A comparison of ideals. The Modern Language Journal, 93(1), 46-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00827.x

Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (2nd ed.). Longman.

Burns, A. (1998). Teaching speaking. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 102-123. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500003500

Candido-Ribeiro, D. (2013). “Às vezes, parece que o coração vai sair pela boca”: A timidez de alunos de Letras na aprendizagem do inglês [“Sometimes, it seems that the heart will come out of the mouth”: Shyness in English language learners]. Contexturas, 19, 29-50.

Carrió-Pastor, M. L., & Vallés, I. T. (2015). A comparative study of the influence of the mother tongue in LSP and CLIL. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 178, 38-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.143

Chanani, U. L., & Wibowo, U. B. (2019). A learning culture and continuous learning for a learning organization. KnE Social Sciences, 3(17), 591-598. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i17.4686

Chaney, A. L., & Burk, T. L. (1998). Teaching oral communication in Grades K-8. Allyn and Bacon.

Cook-Sather, A. (2003). Listening to students about learning differences. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 35(4), 22-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990303500404

Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

de Jong, N., & Perfetti, C. A. (2011). Fluency training in the ESL classroom: An experimental study of fluency development and proceduralization. Language Learning, 61(2), 533-568. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00620.x

Desmaliza, D., & Septiani, T. (2017). Students’ self-efficacy and their speaking skill at lower secondary school. In M. D. H. Rahiem, M. Zuhdi, S. Ratnaningsih, R. S. Dewi, T. K. Maryati, Fahriany, Dwinanto, S. N. Azkiyah, S. Agung, M. Ramli, & M. F. Noor (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Education in Muslim Society (ICEMS 2017) (pp. 122-127). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/icems-17.2018.24

Elen, J., & Lowyck, J. (1999). Metacognitive instructional knowledge: Cognitive mediation and instructional design. Journal of Structural Learning & Intelligent Systems, 13, 145-169.

Finefter-Rosenbluh, I., Ryan, T., & Barnes, M. (2021). The impact of student perception surveys on teachers’ practice: Teacher resistance and struggle in student voice-based assessment initiatives of effective teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 106, 103436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103436

Fisette, J. (2010). Getting to know your students: The importance of learning students’ thoughts and feelings in physical education. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 81(7), 42-49, https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2010.10598508

Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G. (2000). Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, 21(3), 354-375. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.3.354

Galletta, A. (2013). Mastering the semi-structured interview and beyond: From research design to analysis and publication. NYU Press.

Gardner, R. C., & Lalonde, R. N. (1985, August 23-27). Second language acquisition: A social psychological perspective [Paper presentation]. 93rd Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles, USA.

Gardner, R. C., Masgoret, A.-M., Tennant, J., & Mihic, L. (2004). Integrative motivation: Changes during a year-long intermediate-level language course. Language Learning, 54(1), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00247.x

Glaser, B. (1998). Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussions. Sociology Press.

Glaser, B. (2005). The grounded theory perspective III: Theoretical coding. Sociology Press.

Gut, U. (2009). Non-native speech: A corpus-based analysis of phonological and phonetic properties of L2 English and German (1st ed.). Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-01155-5

Hedge, T. (2000). Teaching and learning in the language classroom. Oxford University Press.

Hogan, S. (2008). Voluntary participation: Research methods. Sage Publications.

Holliday, A. (2005). Doing and writing qualitative research (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

Juhana, J. (2012). Psychological factors that hinder students from speaking in English class: A case study in a senior high school in South Tangerang, Banten, Indonesia. Journal of Education and Practice, 3(12), 100-110.

Kalaja, P., Alanen, R., & Dufva, H. (2008). Self-portraits of EFL learners: Finnish students draw and tell. In P. Kalaja, V. Menezes, & A. M. F. Barcelos (Eds.), Narratives of learning and teaching EFL (pp. 186-198). Palgrave Macmillan.

Kansakar, R. (1998). Mother-tongue influence on spoken English: A course in English phonetics. Blackswan Private Limited.

Könings, K. (2007). Student perspectives on education: Implications for instructional redesign [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The Open University of the Netherlands.

Konopka, C. L., Adaime, M. B., & Mosele, P. H. (2015). Active teaching and learning methodologies: Some considerations. Creative Education, 6(14), 1536-1545. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2015.614154

Kowalski, M. J., Elliot, A. J., Guzman, J. C., & Schuenke-Lucien, K. (2022). Early literacy skill development and motivation in the low-income context of Haiti. International Journal of Educational Research, 113, 101972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101972

Krashen, S. (2013). Second language acquisition: Theory, applications, and some conjectures. Cambridge University Press.

Lombardi, D., Shipley, T. F., Bailey, J. M., Bretones, P. S., Prather, E. E., Ballen, C. J., Knight, J. K., Smith, M. K., Stowe, R. L., Cooper, M. M., Prince, M., Atit, K., Uttal, D. H., LaDue, N. D., McNeal, P. M., Ryker, K., St. John, K., van der Hoeven Kraft, K. J., & Docktor, J. L. (2021). The curious construct of active learning. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 22(1), 8-43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100620973974

Maurice, K. (1983). The fluency workshop. TESOL Newsletter, 17(4), 29.

McDonough, K., & Mackey, A. (2000). Communicative tasks, conversational interaction and linguistic form: An empirical study of Thai. Foreign Language Annals, 33(1), 82-92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2000.tb00893.x

Méndez-López, M. G., & Bautista-Tun, M. (2017). Motivating and demotivating factors for students with low emotional intelligence to participate in speaking activities. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 19(2), 151-163. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v19n2.60652

Menezes, V. (2008). Multimedia language learning histories. In P. Kalaja, V. Menezes, & A. M. F. Barcelos (Eds.), Narratives of learning and teaching EFL (pp. 199-213). Palgrave Macmillan.

Molina, M., & Briesmaster, M. (2017). The use of the 3/2/1 technique to foster students’ speaking fluency. Inquiry in Education, 9(2), 1-13.

Moqbel, M. (2018). Self-assessment in EFL grammar classroom: A study of EFL learners at the centre for languages and translation, Ibb University. International Journal for Research in Education, 42(2), 289-324.

Munhall, P. L. (1988). Ethical considerations in qualitative research. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 10(2), 150-162. https://doi.org/10.1177/019394598801000204

Muñoz, A., & Alvarez, M. E. (2007). Student’s objectivity and perception of self assessment in an EFL classroom. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 4(2), 1-25.

Nazara, S. (2011). Students’ perception on EFL speaking skill development. JET: Journal of English Teaching, 1(1), 28-43. https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v1i1.50

Paris, S. G., & Ayres, L. R. (1994). Becoming reflective students and teachers with portfolios and authentic assessment (1st ed.). American Psychological Association.

Phan, T. X., & Phuong, H. Y. (2017). Using analytic rubric for speaking self-assessment: EFL students’ perceptions and challenges. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 7(3), 34-39. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0703043439

Pitkänen-Huhta, A., & Pietikäinen, S. (2016). Visual methods in researching language practices and language learning: Looking at, seeing, and designing language. In K. King, Y. J. Lai, & S. May (Eds.), Research methods in language and education: Encyclopedia of language and education (3rd ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02329-8_29-1 )

Pointon, P., & Kershner, R. (2000). Making decisions about organizing the primary classroom environment as a context for learning: The views of three experienced teachers and their pupils. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(1), 117-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(99)00043-8

Ramírez-Lizcano, N., & Cabrera-Tovar, M. A. (2020). EFL learners’ perceptions about language learning and culture when using telecollaboration. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 22(2), 95-113. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v22n2.82213

Reece, A. R. (2013). Understanding the student perspective of teacher-student engagement in first-year studies courses [Doctoral dissertation, Tennessee State University]. TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/2611

Reece, I., & Walker, S. (1997). Teaching, training and learning: A practical guide (3rd ed.). Business Education Publishers.

Santos, J., & Barcelos, A. (2018). “Não sei de onde vem essa timidez, talvez um medo de parecer ridículo”: um estudo sobre a timidez e a produção oral de alunos de inglês [“I don’t know where this shyness comes from, maybe a fear of looking ridiculous”: A study on shyness and the oral production of English language students]. Revista Horizontes de Linguistica Aplicada, 17(2), 15-38. https://doi.org/10.26512/rhla.v17i2.22627

Santos, J., & Ramírez-Ávila, M. (2022). Improving speaking fluency through 4/3/2 technique and self-assessment. Teaching English as a Second Language Electronic Journal (TESL-EJ), 26(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.26102a1

Santos, J., Veiga, V., & Vélez-Ruiz, M. C. (2020). Evaluación de las emociones que impiden que estudiantes ecuatorianos hablen inglés en clase: Caso Provincia de Los Ríos [Assessment of the emotions that block Ecuadorian students from speaking English in class: Case Los Ríos Province]. Maskana, 11(1), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.18537/mskn.11.01.01

Sheokarah, J., & Pillay, A. (2021). Beyond classroom walls: The role of a co-curricular English club in supporting second language learning. Journal of Education (University of KwaZulu-Natal), 82, 113-128. https://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2520-9868/i82a07

Sjöblom, P., & Svens, M. (2019). Learning in the Finnish outdoor classroom: Pupils’ views. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 19(4), 301-314. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2018.1531042

Spencer, K. J., & Schmelkin, L. P. (2002). Student perspectives on teaching and its evaluation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(5), 397-409. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293022000009285

Thijssen, M. W., Rege, M., & Solheim, O. J. (2022). Teacher relationship skills and student learning. Economics of Education Review, 89, 102251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2022.102251

Tolich, M., & Iphofen, R. (2019). Ethics of qualitative research. In P. Atkinson, S. Delamont, A. Cernat, J. W. Sakshaug, & R. A. Williams (Eds.), SAGE research methods foundations. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526421036745030

Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Waterhouse, F. (1999). Relations between teachers’ approaches to teaching and students’ approaches to learning. Higher Education, 37, 57-70. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003548313194

Tuğrul, M. (2012). Developing speaking skills through reading. International Journal of English Linguistics, 2(6), 91-96. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v2n6p91

Ur, P. (1991). A course in language teaching: Practice and theory. Cambridge University Press.

Vodopija-Krstanoviæ, I., & Brala-Vukanoviæ, M. (2012). EFL students’ perspectives on English: The (widening) gap between ideals and practices. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada, 12(2), 285-309. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-63982012000200004

Widdowson, H. B. (1998). Skills, abilities, and contexts of reality. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18(3), 323-333. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500003615

Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd ed.). ASCD.

Wu, X. M., Zhang, L. J., & Dixon, H. R. (2021). Implementing assessment for learning (AfL) in Chinese university EFL classes: Teachers’ values and practices. System, 101, 102589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102589

Yang, A. C., Chen, I. Y., Flanagan, B., & Ogata, H. (2022). How students’ self-assessment behavior affects their online learning performance. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100058

Yufrizal, H. (2018). The application of the 4/3/2 technique to enhance the speaking fluency of EFL students in Indonesia. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 5(10), 99-107. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.510.5265

Zhou, A. (2006). A further study of the effect of the 4/3/2 technique on spoken English production. CELEA Journal, 29(1), 12-20.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v10i1.25700

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Print ISSN: 2355-2794, Online ISSN: 2461-0275

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


View Journal Stats