Principles of politeness used and violated by Acehnese-speaking Khatibs in their Friday prayer sermons

Ramli Ramli, Ridwan Ibrahim, Kismullah Abdul Muthalib, Teuku Alamsyah, Ahmad Nubli Gadeng

Abstract


This research focused on the politeness of the preachers (henceforth, Khatibs) in delivering sermons. The objective was to find out how politeness principles were applied in the Acehnese language sermons delivered by the Khatibs in Friday prayer processions in Aceh Besar, Indonesia. The data for this research was 15 Friday sermons given at seven sub-districts in Aceh Besar. This study used naturally occurring data from the Friday sermons collected over two months by recording them at 15 mosques within the area of Aceh Besar. Data were transcribed and analyzed using Grice’s maxim theory. The results showed that out of the six politeness maxims, only two maxims, the sympathy maxim, and the tact maxim were found and identified to be applied in the Friday prayer sermons. The sympathy maxim was dominantly used by the Khatibs with 52 occurrences or 68.4% of data, while the tact maxim was found to be used in 24 occurrences or 31.6% of data. Meanwhile, the approbation maxim, the agreement maxim, the modesty maxim, and the generosity maxim were not found in the data. This might be attributed to the nature of the discourse of the sermons as one-way dialogues. It can be concluded that Friday prayers only used the sympathy maxim and tact maxim of politeness because of the one-way communication of Friday sermons. The reasons for the absence of the other four politeness maxims are contextually discussed in this paper.


Keywords


Acehnese language; Friday sermons; politeness principles

Full Text:

PDF

References


Avineri, N., & Avni, S. (2016). Language policy and the reconceptualization of religions as and in institutions. Language Policy, 15(2), 117-123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-015-9359-x

Bhimji, F. (2005). ‘Assalam u Alaikum. Brother, I have a right to my opinion on this’: British Islamic women assert their positions in virtual space. In A. Jule (Ed.), Gender and the language of religion (pp. 203-220). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523494_12

Brown, P. (2015). Politeness and language. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of social & behavioral sciences (2nd ed.) (pp. 326-330). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.53072-4

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Chaer, A. (2010). Kesantunan berbahasa [Language politeness]. PT Rineka Cipta.

Davies, B. L. (2007). Grice’s cooperative principle: Meaning and rationality. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(12), 2308-2331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.09.002

Firdaus, R. S., & Simatupang, E. C. M. (2022). The maxim of politeness in The Squid Game Film Series: A pragmatic study. Ethical Lingua, 9(1), 363, 370. https://doi.org/10.30605/25409190.412

Fraser, B. (1990). Perspective of politeness. Journal of Pragmatics, 14(2) 219-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90081-N

Hashem, M. (2010). Asserting religious text in the modern world: Muslim Friday Khutbahs. American Journal of Islam and Society, 27(4), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.35632/ajis.v27i4.368

Herniti, E., Budiman, A., & Kusumawati, A. A. (2016). Kesantunan berbahasa dalam dakwah multicultural [Politeness in language in multicultural preaching]. Adabiyyāt: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 15(1), 38-62. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajbs.2016.15103

Indriyani, Y., Widodo, S. T., & Rohmadi, M. (2019). Expressive speech act functions in Suara Publik Column of Merapi Newspaper. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences (IJELS), 4(1), 143-146. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijels.4.1.29

Kabar Aceh. (2012, 22 September). Memalukan, Khatib shalat jumat dipaksa turun dari mimbar di Pidie [Embarrassing, Khatib of Friday prayer was forced to step down from the lectern in Pidie] [Facebook post]. Facebook. https://mobile.facebook.com/kabaraceh/photos/a.311532332227511/421989047848505/?type=3&_rdc=1&_rdr

Kádár, D. Z., & Haugh, M. (2013). Understanding politeness. Cambridge University Press.

Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. Longman.

Mahmud, M. (2019). The use of politeness strategies in the classroom context by English university students. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(3) 597-606. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v8i3.15258

Mansoor, I. K. (2018). Politeness: Linguistic study. International Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, 8(IV), 167-179.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage Publications.

Miswar, K. (2022, October 13). Kontestasi otoritas agama di Indonesia [Contestation of religious authority in Indonesia]. Serambi Indonesia.

Muhyiddin, L. (2013). Gaya bahasa khutbah jum’at (Kajian pola retorika) [Friday sermon language style (A study of rhetorical pattern)]. At-Ta’dib, 8(2) 300-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.21111/at-tadib.v8i2.507

Muthalib, K. A. & Aziz, Z. A. (2022). Politeness distinctions in the use of Acehnese pronouns. In Z. A. Aziz, Y. Q. Yusuf, S. S. Fitriani, & D. Fitrisia (Eds.), The Acehnese Language and Society: Language and Linguistics (pp. 73-91). Syiah Kuala University Press.

Nugroho, M. Tarjana, S. S., & Purnanto, D. (2018). The speech act of suggestion by Islamic Khatibs (da’i) in dialogic da’wah in the City of Surakarta. Proceedings of the Fourth Prasasti International Seminar on Linguistics (Prasasti 2018), 166, 401-405. https://doi.org/10.2991/prasasti-18.2018.73

Nurjamily, W, O. (2015). Kesantunan berbahasa Indonesia dalam lingkungan keluarga (Kajian sosiopragmatik) [Indonesian language politeness in the family environment (Sociopragmatic studies)]. Jurnal Humanika, 3(15).

Pfister, J. (2010). Is there a need for a maxim of politeness? Journal of Pragmatics,42(5) 1266-1282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.09.001

Rachmawati, & Al Arif, T. Z. Z. (2020). The interlacing maxims as reflected in the English students’ verbal communication. Jambi-English Language Teaching Journal, 5(1), 24-34.

Song, S. (2012). Politeness and culture in second language acquisition. Palgrave Macmillan.

Terkourafi, M. (2015). The pragmatics of politeness by Geoffrey Leech. (Oxford studies in sociolinguistics). Oxford University Press.

Wahidah, Y. L., & Wijaya, H. (2017). Anaslisis kesantunan berbahasa menurut Leech pada tuturan berbahasa Arab guru pondok pesantren Ibnul Qoyyim Putra Yogyakarta tahun ajaran 2016/2017 (Kajian Pragmatik) [An analysis of language politeness based on Leech’s Theory in Arabic utterances of teachers at Ibnu Qoyyim Islamic Male Boarding School in Yogyakarta academic year 2016/2017 (Pragmatic study)]. Jurnal Al Bayan: Jurnal Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa Arab, 9(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.24042/albayan.v9i1.1239

Wardoyo, C. (2017). Directive speech acts performed in khutbah (Islamic Friday sermon Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Applied Linguistics (CONAPLIN 9), 86, 224-227. https://doi.org/10.2991/conaplin-16.2017.49

Widya. (2017). Maxims of politeness in students-lecturers WhatsApp conversations. Journal of English Language and Culture, 8(1) 71-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.30813/jelc.v8i1.1034

Wijana, I. D. P. (1996). Dasar-dasar pragmatik [Pragmatics fundamental]. Penerbit Abadi.

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.

Yuyun, I. (2014). A study of assertiveness in a debate setting. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(2), 140-153. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v3i2.275




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v10i1.26418

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Print ISSN: 2355-2794, Online ISSN: 2461-0275

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


View Journal Stats