Speech intelligibility of the diastratic varieties of Philippine English

Jin-young Tak, Maribel Zipagan, Eun Joo Kwak

Abstract


The rise of English globalization has prompted speech production variations that reveal the cultural and social backgrounds of the different speakers. However, intelligibility issues of the different varieties have also become a concern. Thus, the present study attempted to assess the intelligibility of Philippine English (PE) diastratic varieties’ speech recordings produced by local Cebuano speakers. Further, it aimed to specifically evaluate the speakers’ production differences, rate the intelligibility of the language varieties, and determine the effect of language variety on the listener-evaluators in terms of intelligibility and distraction ratings. Using an exploratory sequential mixed method design, the speech participants in this study were carefully chosen through multistage sampling first by social class and then by phonological variations. The three final sample speakers out of the initial eighteen were finally categorized as acrolect, mesolect, and basilect. The evaluating groups included English language users from the USA, the Philippines, Korea, and Thailand, and each group represented a region in Kachru’s concentric circle of the World Englishes model. The results identified acrolect as the most intelligible variety followed by mesolect. Basilect, on the other hand, was considered very distracting to the evaluator groups, resulting in a significantly low intelligibility score. Thai evaluators gave the lowest intelligibility ratings, which may be attributed to two factors, L1 interference and unfamiliarity of L2 variation. Finally, future directions and implications in the classroom and industry are stated to create a sense of cultural awareness and to promote a deeper intercultural understanding that comes with international intelligibility.

Keywords


Cebuano English; English varieties; intelligibility; language distraction; L1 interference

Full Text:

PDF

References


Baker, C., & Phongpaichit, P. (2014). A history of Thailand (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Bent, T., & Bradlow, A. (2003). The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 114(3), 1600-1610. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1603234

Buripakdi, A. (2011). Thai journalists’ views on the notion of world Englishes. The Journal of English as an International Language, 6, 59-80.

Cedar, P. (2006). Thai and American responses to compliments in English. The Linguistics Journal, 1(2), 6-28.

Chen, A. (2011). Turning information packaging: Intonational realization of topic and focus in child Dutch. Journal of Child Language, 38(5), 1055-1083. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000910000541

Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Dayag, D. T. (2007). Exploring the intelligibility of Philippine English. Asian Englishes, 10(1), 4-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2007.10801197

Dita, S. N., & De Leon, K. D. (2017). The intelligibility and comprehensibility of Philippine English to EFL speakers. Philippine ESL Journal, 19, 100-116.

Dita, S. N., & De Leon, K. D. (2022). Intelligibility. In A. M. Borlongan (Ed.), Philippine English: Development, structure and sociology of English in the Philippines (pp. 221-230). Routledge.

Farrell, T., & Martin, S. (2009). To teach standard English or world Englishes? A balanced approach to instruction. English Teaching Forum, 47(2), 2-7.

Fetter, M., Curry, L., & Creswell, J. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs – Principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6.2), 2134-2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117

Ghobain, E. (2016). World Englishes and intelligibility in English-medium classrooms. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research 3(2), 202-215.

Gonzales, A. (2008). A favourable climate and soil: A transplanted language and literature. In M. S. Bautista & K. Bolton (Eds.), Philippine English: Linguistic and literary perspectives (pp. 13-27). Hong Kong University Press. https://doi.org/10.5790/hongkong/9789622099470.003.0002

Grimes, B. (Ed.) (2002). Ethnologue: Language of the world (14th ed.). Summer Institute of Linguistics.

Gruszka, M. C. (2013, April 3). The importance of speech intelligibility. tvtech. https://www.tvtechnology.com/miscellaneous/the-importance-of-speech-intelligibility.

Jacewicz, E., & Fox, R. A. (2014). The effect of dialect variation on speech intelligibility in a multitalker background. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(3), 729-746. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716413000489

Jenkins, J. (2000). The phonology of English as an international language. Oxford University Press.

Jenkins, J. (2003). World Englishes. A resource book for students. Routledge.

Jones, L. (1991). Communicative grammar practice student’s book: Activities for intermediate students of English. Cambridge University Press.

Kennedy, S., & Trofimovich, P. (2008). Intelligibility, comprehensibility, and accentedness of L2 speech: The role of listener experience and semantic context. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(3), 459-489. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.64.3.459

Kirkpatrick, A. (2014). World Englishes. In C. Leung & B. V. Street (Eds.), The Routledge companion to English studies (pp. 33-45). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315852515.ch3

Leung, A. (2011). I know [pIlIpIno] but I say [fIlIpIno]: An investigation into Filipino foreign domestic helpers’ influence on Hong Kong Chinese’s L2 English phonology acquisition. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 47(1), 81-95. https://doi.org/10.2478/psicl-2011-0007

Leung, A. (2012). Bad influence? An investigation into the purported negative influence of foreign domestic helpers on children’s second language English acquisition. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 33(2), 133-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2011.649038

Levis, J. (2018). Intelligibility, oral communication, and the teaching of pronunciation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108241564

Li, H. P., & Chen, H. C. (2019). Intelligibility and comprehensibility of the Filipino English accent to Hong Kong English speakers. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 25(1), 23-42. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2019-2501-02

Llamzon, T. (1977). The phonology of English. In M. S. Bautista (Ed.), English is an Asian language: The Philippine context (pp. 41-48). The Macquarie Library.

McFarland, C. D. (2008). Linguistic diversity and English in the Philippines. In M. S. Bautista & K. Bolton (Eds.), Philippine English. Linguistic and literary perspectives (pp. 131-156). Hong Kong University Press. https://doi.org/10.5790/hongkong/9789622099470.003.0008

Milroy, J., & Milroy, L. (2012). Authority in language (4th ed.). Routledge.

Morley, J. (1991). The pronunciation component in teaching English to speakers of other languages. TESOL Quarterly, 25(3), 481-520. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586981

Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (2015). Intelligibility in research and practice. In M. Reed & J. M. Levis (Eds.), The handbook of English pronunciation (pp. 375-396). Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118346952.ch21

Philippine Statistics Authority. (2019, June 27). Total number of OFWs estimated at 2.3 million (Results from the 2018 survey on overseas Filipinos). https://psa.gov.ph/content/total-number-ofws-estimated-23-million-results-2018-survey-overseas-filipinos

Sadighi, F., & Zare, S. (2006). Is listening comprehension influenced by the background knowledge of the learners? A case study of Iranian EFL learners. The Linguistics Journal, 1(3), 110-126.

Smith, L. E., & Nelson, C. L. (2019). World Englishes and issues of intelligibility. In C. Nelson, Z. Proshina, & D. Davis (Eds.), The handbook of World Englishes (pp. 430-446). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119147282.ch24

Tayao, M. L. (2004). The evolving study of Philippine English phonology. World Englishes, 23(1), 77-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2004.00336.x

Tayao, M. L. (2008). A lectal description of the phonological features of Philippine English. In M. S. Bautista & K. Bolton (Eds.), Philippine English: Linguistic and literary perspectives (pp. 157-174). Hong Kong University Press. https://doi.org/10.5790/hongkong/9789622099470.003.0009

Tonio, J. Z. (2019). Intelligibility of Philippine English to young international students. Asian EFL Journal, 25(5.1), 213-240.

Tupas, T. R. (2004). The politics of Philippine English: Neo-colonialism, global politics, and the problem of postcolonialism. World Englishes, 23(1), 47-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2004.00334.x

Wagner, B. (2009). Scrutinizing rules for foreigners in Korea: How much discrimination is reasonable? Kyung Hee University Law Journal, 44(3), 391-416.

Weinberger, S. (2015). Speaker ID: 145 [Speech accent archive]. http://accent.gmu.edu/browse_language.php?function=detail&speakerid=145

Xia, X. (2013). Gender differences in using language. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(8), 1485-1489. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.8.1485-1489

Zhang, Y., Nissen, S., & Francis, A. (2008). Acoustic characteristics of English lexical stress produced by native Mandarin speakers. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123(6), 498-513. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2902165




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v10i3.29241

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Print ISSN: 2355-2794, Online ISSN: 2461-0275

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


View Journal Stats