Generalized structured component analysis (GSCA) method in evaluating service satisfaction at FMIPA Syiah Kuala University

EVI RAMADHANI, NURJARIATI NURJARIATI, NURHASANAH NURHASANAH, NANY SALWA, LATIFAH RAHAYU SIREGAR

Abstract


This research focuses on the Generalized Structured Component Analysis (GSCA) method in evaluating service satisfaction at FMIPA Syiah Kuala University (USK).  FMIPA USK is expected to have good service quality to satisfy stakeholders with the services provided.  FMIPA USK needs to know the factors that affect service satisfaction.  An internal survey of the integrity zone is one way to determine the quality and satisfaction of the services provided by FMIPA USK.  However, this survey uses indirect variables, so the structural equation model (SEM) can be used.  The SEM method used in this study is component-based SEM, namely Generalized Structured Component Analysis (GSCA).  GSCA is used because questionnaires do not fulfill existing assumptions in general research, and the GSCA method does not require many assumptions.  This research aims to form a model, determine the relationship between indicators and latent variables, and know the relationship between latent variables and the factors significantly affecting student satisfaction with services at FMIPA USK.  The results of this study show that the indicators used are valid and reliable.  Reliability, assurance, empathy, and tangibles is a factor that affects service satisfaction.  Models formed in this study have a GFI value of 0.962 and SRMR of 0.365, so the model used is suitable.


Keywords


generalized structured component analysis (GSCA), service satisfaction, structural equation model (SEM), survey

References


A, A, Mattjik .; I. M. Sumertajaya. 2011. Sidik Peubah Ganda dengan Menggunakan SAS 1st ed (Bogor: IPB PRESS).

Ramadiani. 2010. Structural Equation Model Untuk Analisis Multivariate Menggunakan LISREL. J. Inform. Mulawarman. 5(1), 14–18.

Ngatno. 2019. Analisis Data Penelitian dengan Program GESCA, 2nd ed (Semarang: Penerbit UNDIP Press).

A, Afthanorhan.; Z, Awang and M, Mamat. 2016. A comparative study between GSCA - SEM and PLS - SEM. MJ J. Stat. Probab. 1(1), 63–72. DOI: 10.14419/jsp.v1i1.28.

F, Fitriani.; A, Rusgiyono and T, Widiharih. 2020. Penerapan Metode Generalized Structured Component Analysis pada Kepuasan Konsumen (Studi Kasus: Pasien Klinik Q). J. Gaussian. 9(4), 454–463. DOI: 10.14710/j.gauss.v9i4.29416.

V.J, Rahareng.; N, Relawan. 2017. Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan Akademik Terhadap Kepuasan Mahasiswa (Studi pada Mahasiswa Administrasi Bisnis Universitas Telkom). AdBispreneur. 2(2) 125–133. DOI: 10.24198/adbispreneur.v2i2.13164.

I. G. M. Y, Bakti.; S. Sumaedi. 2017. IKM Plus : Teknik Pengukuran Kepuasan Masyarakat untuk Mendukung Reformasi Birokrasi Instansi Pelayanan Publik (Jakarta: LIPI Press).

P, Kotler.; K. L, Keller. 2012. Marketing Management 14th ed (London: Pearson Education).

R, Lupiyoadi. 2008. Manajemen Pemasaran Jasa (Jakarta: Salemba Empat).

E, Radjab.; A, Jam’an. 2017. Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis 1st ed (Makassar: Lembaga Perpustakaan dan Penerbitan Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar).

R. L, Scheaffer.; W. M, III and R. L, Ott. 2006. Elementary Survey Sampling (United States of America: The Book Company).

Malhotra. 2009. Manajemen Pemasaran. (Jakarta: Erlangga)

F. A, Pratiwi.; N. N, Debataraja and S, Martha. 2021. Analisis Derajat Kesehatan di Kalimantan Barat dengan Generalized Structured Component Analysis. Bul. Ilm. Mat. Stat. dan Ter. 10(2), 277–286.

Komarudin.; Sarkadi. 2017. Evaluasi Pembelajaran. (Jakarta: Laboratorium Sosial Politik Press Universitas Negeri Jakarta).

I, Ghozali.; K. A, Kusumadewi. 2013. Generalized Structured Component Analysis (GeSCA) Model Persamaan Struktural Berbasis Komponen (Semarang: Badan Penebit Universtas Diponogoro).

H, Latan. 2014. Generalized Structured Component Analysis: Teori, Konsep, dan Aplikasi Menggunakan GeSCA (Bandung: PT. Sarana Tutorial Nurani Sejahtera).

Susana Sura Leka.; T. S, Yanti. 2020. GSCA Model untuk Menentukan Pengaruh Kualitas Layanan dan Fasilitas Terhadap Kepuasan Mahasiswa Program Studi Statistika FMIPA Univeristas Islam Bandung. Pros. Stat. Prodi Stat. Fak. Mat. dan Ilmu Pengetah. Alam, Univ. Islam Bandung, Indonesia. 6(2), 72–79.

A, Triono.; I.W, Mustika and D, Adhipta. 2013. Evaluasi Implementasi Library Information System ( UMSlibrary ) dari Perspektif Mahasiswa di Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta ( UMS). KomuniTi. 5(1), 10–16.

L. T, Hu.; P.M, Bentler. 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equ. Model. 6(1), 1–55. DOI: 10.1080/10705519909540118.

S, Wahyuni. 2015. Kepuasan Konsumen ditinjau dari Pelayanan pada Lesehan Apung Pacet Mini Park di Desa Warugunung Kecamatan Pacet Kabupaten Mojokerto. e-Journal Boga. 4(3), 39–48.

S, Bulkia. 2018. Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan Terhadap Kepuasan Mahasiswa. At-Tadbir J. Ilm. Manaj. 2(1), 49–58. DOI: 10.31602/atd.v2i1.1191.

M, Yusa.; A. S. F, Alqap.; Helmizar.; N, Hidayati. 2021. Analisis Tingkat Kepuasan Mahasiswa Terhadap Pelayanan Akademik di Fakultas Teknik Universitas Bengkulu. J. Bisnis , Manajemen, dan Inform. 18(2), 103–118. DOI: 10.26487/jbmi.v18i2.14104.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.24815/jn.v23i2.27808

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.