Analisis Data Ordinal untuk Mengetahui Tingkat Persetujuan Pengetahuan dan Pelaksanaan Visi dan Misi Jurusan Statistika FMIPA Universitas Syiah Kuala

Abstract

The National Higher Education Accreditation Board Regulation (BAN-PT) number 2 of 2017 concerning the national accreditation system of higher education makes the vision and mission as one of the assessments and instruments for the accreditation of majors in tertiary institutions. The success of the implementation of the vision and mission is determined by the involvement of the entire academic community within the Department of Statistics, namely lecturers, employees, students, and alumni. Measurements used to find out knowledge about vision and mission can be obtained through a questionnaire that all questions in the questionnaire use an ordinal measurement scale. The ordinal scale cannot explain information clearly, resulting in the loss of a conclusion. Thus, it would be better to transform it into interval data. Data analysis methods used are the successive interval method, the equal appearing intervals method, and the Thurstone (The Law of Comparative Judgment) method to convert ordinal data into intervals so that conclusions can be drawn and also calculate the error value of each method called the average nonconformity test (average discrepancy). The conclusion drawn based on the method of equal appearing intervals, the law of comparative judgment, and successive intervals is "The highest level of agreement on the knowledge and implementation of vision and mission using the three methods is on variables 9 and 14 which means that the academic community The Department of Statistics FMIPA Unsyiah knows that there is a mission in the Department of Statistics FMIPA Unsyiah and the vision needs to be socialized. The lowest level of agreement on the knowledge and implementation of vision using the three methods is in variables 16 and 3 which means that the academic community tends not to memorize the vision and mission of the Department of Statistics FMIPA Unsyiah ". Methods that can be calculated error rate is the law of comparative judgment method with an error rate of 1.2% and a successive intervals method with an error rate of 3%.