PERBEDAAN LUAS PERMUKAAN PROSESUS KONDILARIS ANTARA PENDERITA DAN BUKAN PENDERITA BRUXISM MELALUI RADIOGRAFI PANORAMIK

Farah Nurul Salsabila, Rasmi Rikmasari, Lusi Epsilawati

Abstract


 

ABSTRAK

Bruxism dapat menyebabkan nyeri pada otot mastikasi atau sendi temporomandibula (TMJ). Beberapa penelitian menunjukan bahwa bruxism dapat memberikan beban besar pada TMJ. Namun, penelitian mengenai efek bruxism pada prosesus kondilaris masih minim. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah terdapat perbedaan luas permukaan prosesus kondilaris pada penderita bruxism dibandingkan dengan bukan penderita bruxism berdasarkan radiograf panoramik. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian analitik cross-sectional pada radiograf panoramik penderita dan bukan penderita bruxism di Instalasi Radiologi Rumah Sakit Gigi dan Mulut Universitas Padjadjaran (RSGM Unpad). Kelompok bruxism terdiri dari 24 subjek sementara kelompok bukan penderita bruxism terdiri dari 20 subjek. Luas permukaan prosesus kondilaris diukur menggunakan software ImageJ. Hasil penelitian dianalisis menggunakan independent t-test, dan chi-squared test. Reliabilitas ditentukan menggunakan intra-class correlation coefficient. Penelitian ini mendapatkan rata-rata luas permukaan prosesus kondilaris pada penderita bruxism di regio kanan dan kiri adalah 201,38  39.36 mm dan 191,05  41,90 mm. Pada kelompok bukan penderita bruxism, rata-ratanya adalah 251,35  49,52 mm dan 234,34 43,86 mm di regio kanan dan kiri Penelitian ini menemukan rata-rata luas permukaan prosesus kondilaris pada pasien bruxism lebih kecil dari bukan penderita bruxism tetapi perbedaannya tidak signifikan. Selain itu, perbedaan luas permukaan tidak terikat dengan kondisi bruxism.

ABSTRACT

Bruxism can cause pain in the masticatory muscles and the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). Studies have shown that bruxism can exert large load on the TMJ. However, research on the effects of bruxism on the condylar process is still rare. This study aims to determine whether there is a difference in the surface area of the condylar process in patients with bruxism compared to patients without bruxism based on panoramic radiographs. This was a cross-sectional analytic study conducted on panoramic radiographs of bruxism and non-bruxism patient at the Radiology Unit in Rumah Sakit Gigi dan Mulut Universitas Padjadjaran (RSGM UNPAD). The bruxism group consisted of 24 subjects, while the non-bruxism group consisted of 20 subjects. Condylar surface area was measured using ImageJ software. The results were analyzed with independent t-test and chi-squared test. Reliability was determined using intra-class correlation coefficient. The average surface area of the right and left condylar process in bruxism patients was 201.38 ± 39.36 mm and 191.05 ± 41.90 mm. In non-bruxism patients, the mean surface area was 251.35 ± 49.52 mm and 234.34 ± 43.86 mm in the right and left region. This study found that the average surface area of condylar process in bruxism patients was smaller than non-bruxism patients. but the difference was not significant. In addition, the difference in surface area was not related to the condition of bruxism.



Keywords


Bruxism; prosesus kondilaris; remodeling; radiografi panoramik

Full Text:

PDF

References


Hartono SWA, Rusminah N, Adenan A. Bruksisma bruxism. J Dentomaxillofacial Sci. 2011;10(3):184–9.

Lobbezoo F, Ahlberg J, Glaros AG, Kato T, Koyano K, G.J LLR, et al. Bruxism defined and graded: an international consensus. J Oral Rehabil. 2013;40(1):2–4.

Manfredini D, Serra-Negra J, Carboncini F, Lobbezoo F. Current concepts of bruxism. Int J Prosthodont. 2017;30(5):437–8.

Manfredini D, Colonna A, Bracci A, Lobbezoo F. Bruxism: a summary of current knowledge on aetiology, assessment and management. Oral Surg. 2019;13(7):358–70.

Przystańska A, Jasielska A, Ziarko M, Pobudek-Radzikowska M, Maciejewska-Szaniec Z, Prylińska-Czyżewska A, et al. Psychosocial predictors of bruxism. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:15–22.

Commisso S, Martı J, Mayo J. A study of the temporomandibular joint during bruxism. Int J Oral Sci. 2014;6(Dec):116–23.

Manfredini D, Winocur E, Guarda-Nardini L, Paesani D, Lobbezoo F. Epidemiology of bruxism in adults: a systematic review of the literature. J Orofac Pain. 2013;27(2):99–110.

Strausz T, Ahlberg J, Lobbezoo F, Restrepo CC, Hublin C, Ahlberg K, et al. Awareness of tooth grinding and clenching from adolescence to young adulthood: a nine-year follow-up. J Oral Rehabil. 2010;37(7):497–500.

Glick M. Burket’s oral medicine and diagnosis. 12th ed. Shelton, Connecticut: People’s Medical Publishing House USA; 2015. 224–229 p.

Willems NMBK, Langenbach GEJ, Everts V, Zentner A. The microstructural and biomechanical development of the condylar bone: a review. Eur J Orthod. 2014;36(4):479–85.

Hegde S, Bn P, Shetty SR. Morphological and radiological variations of mandibular condyles in health and diseases : a systematic review. Dentistry. 2013;3(1):154–8.

Dos Anjos Pontual ML, Freire JSL, Barbosa JMN, Frazão MAG, Dos Anjos Pontual A. Evaluation of bone changes in the temporomandibular joint using cone beam CT. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2012;41(1):24–9.

Mori H, Horiuchi S, Nishimura S, Nikawa H, Murayama T, Ueda K, et al. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of cartilaginous tissues in human temporomandibular joint during prolonged clenching. Arch Oral Biol. 2010;55(11):879–86.

Aneja V, Raval R, Aneja P, Rai KK, Agarwal S, Chuadhary S. Evaluation of mandibular condylar changes in patients following orthognathic surgery: a retrospective study. Niger J Surg Off Publ Niger Surg Res Soc. 2017;23(1):37–41.

Parra-Torres AY, Valdes-Flores M, Orozco L, Velazquez-Cruz R. Molecular aspects of bone remodeling. Valdés-Flores M, editor. Top Osteoporos. 2013;1(May):1–28.

Raggatt LJ, Partridge NC. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of bone remodeling. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(33):25103–8.

Feng X, McDonald JM. Disorders of bone remodelling. Annu Rev Pathol. 2011;6:121–45.

Bonewald LF. The amazing osteocyte. J Bone Miner Res. 2011;26(2):229–38.

Gunson MJ, Arnett GW, Milam SB. Pathophysiology and pharmacologic control of osseous mandibular condylar resorption. J Oral Maxillofac Surg [Internet]. 2012;70(8):1918–34. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2011.07.018

Hienz SA, Paliwal S, Ivanovski S. Mechanisms of bone resorption in periodontitis. J Immunol Res. 2015;2015:2–5.

Adamopoulos IE. Inflammation in bone physiology and pathology. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2018;30(1):59–64.

Dias GM, Bonato LL, Guimarães JP, Nogueira Silva JN, Ferreira LA, Grossmann E, et al. A study of the association between sleep bruxism, low quality of sleep, and degenerative changes of the temporomandibular joint. J Craniofac Surg. 2015;26(8):2347–50.

Satheeswarakumar LP, Elenjickal TJ, Kiran S, Ram M. Assessment of mandibular surface area changes in bruxers versus vontrols on panoramic radiographic images : a case control study. Open Dent J. 2018;12:753–61.

Jain A, Bhaskar DJ, Yadav P, Lukram A, Khurana R. Bruxism : an obscure pain. J Int Dent Med Res. 2014;1(1):21–30.

Nakayama R, Nishiyama A, Shimada M. Bruxism related signs and periodontal disease: a preliminary study. Open Dent J. 2018;12(1):400–5.

Tecco S, Saccucci M, Nucera R, Polimeni A, Pagnoni M, Cordasco G, et al. Condylar volume and surface in Caucasian young adult subjects. BMC Med Imaging. 2010;10(28):1–10.

Caruso S, Storti E, Nota A, Ehsani S, Gatto R. Temporomandibular joint anatomy assessed by CBCT images. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017(1):36–45.

Yong H, Huh JK. Evaluation of the condylar remodeling and affecting factors after orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg [Internet]. 2019;77(9):e8–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2019.06.024

Sarver DM, Janyavula S, Cron RQ. Condylar degeneration and diseases-local and systemic etiologies. Semin Orthod [Internet]. 2013;19(2):89–96. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2012.11.008

Murphy MK, MacBarb RF, Wong ME, Athanasiou KA. Temporomandibular disorders: a review of etiology, clinical management, and tissue engineering strategies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013;28(6):e393–414.

Wetselaar P, Vermaire EJH, Lobbezoo F, Schuller AA. The prevalence of awake bruxism and sleep bruxism in the dutch adult population. J Oral Rehabil. 2019;46(7):617–23.

Khoury S, Carra MC, Huynh N, Montplaisir J, Lavigne GJ. Sleep bruxism-tooth grinding prevalence, characteristics and familial aggregation: a large cross-sectional survey and polysomnographic validation. Sleep. 2016;39(11):2049–56.

Kato T, Velly AM, Nakane T, Masuda Y, Maki S. Age is associated with self-reported sleep bruxism, independently of tooth loss. Sleep Breath. 2012;16(4):1159–65.

Saczuk K, Lapinska B, Wilmont P, Pawlak L, Lukomska-Szymanska M. The bruxoff device as a screening method for sleep bruxism in dental practice. J Clin Med. 2019;8(7):930.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/cdj.v15i1.21555

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Cakradonya Dental Journal

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

VISITORS

 

 

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.