Exploration of Students' Epistemological Obstacles in Understanding the Concept of Variables and Expressions

Rosliana Siregar; Muhammad Daut Siagian; Tommy Tanu Wijaya

doi:10.24815/jdm.v10i1.30694

Exploration of Students' Epistemological Obstacles in Understanding the Concept of Variables and Expressions

Rosliana Siregar, Muhammad Daut Siagian, Tommy Tanu Wijaya

Abstract

Variables and expressions serve as bridges where students cross from arithmetic to algebra. Although variables and expressions are important concepts in middle school and high school mathematics, they are topics that many students find challenging, and many, in fact, do not develop a thorough understanding of these topics. This study aims to explore the epistemological obstacles students face in understanding and interpreting the concepts of variables and expressions. Based on these objectives, a qualitative research design with a phenomenological approach was chosen to achieve this research objective. The subjects in this study were 8th grade middle school students in the city of Medan, Indonesia. Tests and interviews were used to collect data. The data obtained were analyzed using an inductive approach. The data obtained are presented in narrative and graphical forms. Based on the research results obtained, six types of student errors in solving problems related to the concept of variables and expressions were identified. Overall, students' limitations in understanding and interpreting variables as something unknown is one of the triggers for epistemological obstacles. Teachers should give chances for pupils to debate and explain variables and expressions in the classroom to assist students gain a comprehensive knowledge of these mathematical tools.

Keywords

epistemological obstacle, variables, algebraic expression

Full Text:

PDF

References

Brousseau, G. (2002). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203029053

Dey, I. (1993). Qualitative data analysis: A user-friendly guide for social scientists. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315701134-11

Grbich, C. (2007). Qualitative data analysis: An introduction. London: Sage Publication Inc.

Herstein, I. N. (1964). Topics in algebra. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Job, P., & Schneider, M. (2014). Empirical positivism, an epistemological obstacle in the learning of calculus. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(4), 635–646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0604-0

Jupri, A., Drijvers, P., & van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2014). Difficulties in initial algebra learning in Indonesia. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26(4), 683–710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-013-0097-0

Kaput, James J. (2008). What is algebra? What is algebraic reasoning? In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carrahe, & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in The Early Grades. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Kieran, C., Pang, J., Schifter, D., & Ng, S. F. (2016). Early algebra: Research into its nature, its learning, its teaching. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

Kriegler, S. (2007). Just what is algebraic thinking? Introduction to Algebra: Teacher Handbook, 1–11. Retrieved from https://mathandteaching.org/uploads/Articles_PDF/articles-01-kriegler.pdf

Langdridge, D. (2007). Phenomenological psychology: Theory, research and methods. London: Pearson.

LeCompte, M. D. (2000). Analyzing qualitative data. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 146–154. https://doi.org/10.1109/MMM.2019.2922800

Linchevski, L. (1995). Algebra with numbers and arithmetic with letters: A definition of pre-algebra. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 14(1), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/0732-3123(95)90026-8

Linchevski, L., & Herscovics, N. (1996). Crossing the cognitive gap between arithmetic and algebra: Operating on the unknown in the context of equations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 30(1), 39–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00163752

MacGregor, M., & Stacey, K. (1995). The effect of different approaches to algebra on students’ perceptions of functional relationships. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 7(1), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217276

Macgregor, M., & Stacey, K. (1997). Students’ understanding of algebraic notation: 11-15. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 33(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002970913563

Maknun, C. L., Rosjanuardi, R., & Jupri, A. (2022). Epistemological obstacle in learning trigonometry. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 14(2), 5–25.

Marpa, E. P. (2019). Common errors in algebraic expressions: A quantitative-aualitative analysis. International Journal on Social and Education Scienc Es, 1(2), 63–72.

Mengistie, S. M. (2020). Enhancing students’ understanding of linear equation with one variable through teaching. International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research, 3(2), 69–80. Retrieved from http://ijtmer.com/index.php/ijtmer/article/view/148

NCTM. (2000). Principles standards and for school mathematics. Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.

Noto, M. S., Pramuditya, S. A., & Handayani, V. D. (2020). Exploration of learning obstacle based on mathematical understanding of algebra in junior high school. Eduma: Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching, 9(1), 14–20. https://doi.org/10.24235/eduma.v9i1.5946

Panizza, M., Sadovskya, P., & Sessa, C. (1997). Two letters in one equation: Unknowns or variables? In E. Pehkonen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2rt Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, p. 262). Lahti, Finland.

Schoenfeld, A. H., & Arcavi, A. (1988). On the meaning of variable. Mathematics Teacher, 81(6), 420–427. https://doi.org/10.4013/fsu.2019.202.04

Siagian, M. D., Suryadi, D., Nurlaelah, E., & Prabawanto, S. (2022). Investigation of secondary students’ epistemological obstacles in the inequality concept. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 14(4), 106–128.

Siagian, M. D., Suryadi, D., Nurlaelah, E., Tamur, M., & Sulastri, R. (2021). Investigating students’ concept image in understanding variables. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1882(1), 012058. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1882/1/012058

Sidik, G. S., Suryadi, D., & Turmudi, T. (2021). Learning obstacle on addition and subtraction of primary school students: Analysis of algebraic thinking. Education Research International, 2021, 5935179. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5935179

Suhaedi, D. (2013). Peningkatan kemampuan komunikasi matematis, berpikir aljabar, dan disposisi matematis siswa smp melalui pendekatan pendidikan matematika realistik (Disertasi). Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Suryadi, D. (2019). Landasan filosofis penelitian desain didaktis (DDR). Bandung: Gapura Press.

Tabach, M., & Friedlander, A. (2008). The role of context in learning beginning algebra. In C. E. Greens (Ed.), Algebra and Algebraic Thinking in School Math: 70th YB (pp. 223–232). Reston: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Tabach, M., & Friedlander, A. (2017). Algebraic procedures and creative thinking. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 49(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0803-y

Wagner, S., & Parker, S. (1993). Advancing algebra. In P. S. Wilson (Ed.), Research idea for the classroom high school mathematics. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.

Watson, A., Jones, K., & Pratt, D. (2013). Key ideas in teaching mathematics: Research-based guidance for ages 9-19. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Yansa, H., Retnawati, H., & Janna, M. (2021). Misconceptions of basic algebra on linear equation in one variable material. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1882(1), 012091. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1882/1/012091

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/jdm.v10i1.30694