Students’ Mathematical Creative Thinking and Learning Obstacles in Solving Ill-Structured Exponential Problems

Tsania Rahmatin, Jarnawi Afgani Dahlan, Al Jupri

Abstract


Mathematical creative thinking (MCT) is crucial for equipping students to solve complex, real-world problems. However, students frequently encounter difficulties with non-routine tasks that require divergent thinking. This study investigates students' MCT and identifies their learning obstacles when solving ill-structured exponential problems. A qualitative descriptive approach under the Didactical Design Research (DDR) framework was employed, involving seven high school students from high, medium, and low achievement levels. Data were gathered through tests and semi-structured interviews, analyzing four MCT indicators: fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration. Results showed that students predominantly struggled with fluency and flexibility, often depending on a single method and facing difficulty in generating diverse representations. Originality was restricted by reliance on routine classroom procedures, whereas elaboration, despite being relatively stronger, occasionally led to incorrect conclusions. Identified learning obstacles (didactical, ontogenetic, and epistemological) stemmed from an instructional emphasis on procedural tasks, foundational conceptual misunderstandings, and rigid mathematical perceptions. Ill-structured tasks proved effective in revealing hidden learning obstacles that are often overlooked in routine activities. The study highlights the significance of regularly integrating ill-structured problems into mathematics instruction to foster creativity and address underlying learning challenges.


Keywords


mathematical creative thinking abilities; learning obstacles; ill-structured problems; exponential, didactical design research

References


Beghetto, R. A. (2019). Structured uncertainty: how creativity thrives under constraints and uncertainty (pp. 27–40). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90272-2_2

Brady, C., Eames, C. L., & Lesh, D. (2015). Connecting real-world and in-school problem-solving experiences. Quadrante, XXIV(2), 5–38.

Brousseau, G. (2002). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics. In Theory of Didactical Situations in Mathematics. Kluwer Academic. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47211-2

Budinski, N. (2020). Exponential functions through a real-world context. Open Schools Journal for Open Science, 3(10). https://doi.org/10.12681/osj.24891

Cho, M. K., & Kim, M. K. (2020). Investigating elementary students’ problem solving and teacher scaffolding in solving an Ill-structured problem. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 8(4), 274–289. https://doi.org/10.46328/IJEMST.V8I4.1148

Fitriani, S., & Yarmayani, A. (2018). Pengembangan rubrik berpikir kreatif siswa menengah atas dalam menyelesaikan masalah matematika. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 33–38. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v7i1.339

Fuadi, R., Johar, R., & Munzir, S. (2016). Peningkatkan kemampuan pemahaman dan penalaran matematis melalui pendekatan kontekstual. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, 3(1), 47–54. https://jurnal.usk.ac.id/DM/article/view/4305

Guilford, J. . (1967). The nature of human intelligence. In The Nature of Human Intelligence. McGraw-Hill Book Company. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316817049

Hong, J. Y., & Kim, M. K. (2016). Mathematical abstraction in the solving of ill-structured problems by elementary school students in Korea. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(2), 267–281. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1204a

Johar, R., Aslamiah, S., Husin, M., & Yanti, I. (2023). Teacher efforts in developing student creativity through realistic mathematics education in elementary school. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(4), 721–734. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v12i4.1186

Khalil, I. A. (2024). Mathematics learning orientation: Mathematical creative thinking ability or creative disposition? Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(1), 253–276.

Kohen, Z. (2025). Exploring Swedish secondary students’ mathematical models of fairness in ranking real-life, multi-faceted heptathlon outcomes. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 317–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-025-01678-z

Kusumanegara, M. R. (2024). Concept image siswa pada materi eksponen dan sifat-sifatnya: sebuah kajian fenomenologi-hermeneutis. repository.upi.edu. http://repository.upi.edu/id/eprint/122097

Leikin, R., & Levav-Waynberg, A. (2008). Solution spaces of multiple-solution connecting tasks as a mirror of the development of mathematics teachers’ knowledge. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 8(3), 233–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926150802304464

Liu, C., Zhuang, K., Zeitlen, D. C., Chen, Q., Wang, X., Feng, Q., Beaty, R. E., & Qiu, J. (2024). Neural, genetic, and cognitive signatures of creativity. Communications Biology, 7(1), 1324. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-024-07007-6

Magaletto, R. (2021). Engaging students through modeling. Mathematics Teacher: Learning and Teaching PK-12, 114(2), 125–131. https://doi.org/10.5951/mtlt.2020.0025

Mahato, S. K., Sahani, S. K., Sahani, K., Sah, B. K., & Karna, S. K. (2024). Study and analysis of some real life applications of exponential function. Journal of Research in Education Management, 2(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.58578/edumalsys.v2i1.2845

Ningrum, D. P. N., Usodo, B., & Subanti, S. (2023). Students’ mathematical conceptual understanding : What. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2566(1), 020017.

Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y

Prediger, S., Gravemeijer, K., & Confrey, J. (2015). Design research with a focus on learning processes: an overview of achievements and challenges. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 47(6), 877–891. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0722-3

Rožman, M., & Vreˇ, I. (2025). Psychological factors impacting academic performance among business studies students. Education Sciences, 15(2), 121. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020121

Santos-Trigo, M. (2024). Problem solving in mathematics education: tracing its foundations and current research-practice trends. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 56(2), 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-024-01578-8

Schukajlow, S., Krawitz, J., Kanefke, J., Blum, W., & Rakoczy, K. (2023). Open modelling problems: cognitive barriers and instructional prompts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 114(3), 417–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-023-10265-6

Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating: Human development, the growth of discourses, and mathematizing. In Thinking as communicating: Human development, the growth of discourses, and mathematizing (Issue August). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511499944

Siller, H. S., Elschenbroich, H. J., Greefrath, G., & Vorhölter, K. (2023). Mathematical modelling of exponential growth as a rich learning environment for mathematics classrooms. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 55(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01433-8

Simon, H. A. (1973). The structure of ill structured problems. Artificial Intelligence, 4(3–4), 181–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(73)90011-8

Sta. Maria, M., Cruz, C., San Juan, M. J., Tan, C., & Amarnani, R. (2022). The concept of originality and creativity in the humanities, the social sciences, and the natural sciences. Asia-Pacific Journal of IP Management and Innovation, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.59588/2984-892x.1011

Suherman, S., & Vidákovich, T. (2022). Assessment of mathematical creative thinking: A systematic review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 44(February). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101019

Suryadi, D. (2019). Landasan filosofis penelitian DDR. Gapura Press.

Susanto, D., Kurniawan, T., Sihombing, S. K., Salim, E., Radjawane, M. M.,

Salmah, U., & Wardani, A. K. (2021). Buku siswa matematika SMA/SMK kelas X. In Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Torrance, E. P. (2011). Guiding creative talent. In Guiding creative talent. Pickle Partners Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1037/13134-000

Yulianti, E., Rahman, N. F. A., Rahmadani, A., Phang, F. A., & Suwono, H. (2025). Exploring students’ creativity using STEAM-based reading texts. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 44(1), 181–187. https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.44.1.181187


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.24815/jdm.v12i1.43834

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Tsania Rahmatin, Jarnawi Afgani Dahlan, Al Jupri

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.