The effect of using computer-assisted reading with inquiry-based learning on student reading comprehension
Abstract
This study aims to determine whether there is a difference between students who read using computer-assisted reading and those who read using other means in terms of reading. The sample was 23 students studying at two senior high schools in Sumenep, East Java, Indonesia. They were selected from student representatives based on their English language skills. The experiment was divided into six stages which include learning and testing. The researchers used lexical-tutor where there are audio-assisted reading, concordance, and online dictionary. For the learning process, researchers use inquiry-based learning, which focuses on student activity. To determine whether there is an effect on reading comprehension, the researcher used a paired sample t-test and an independent sample test to determine whether there is a difference in student reading comprehension score using an inquiry-based computer aid with those who do not use it. Based on the results of the study, there is no effect and no difference between reading using computer-assisted reading with inquiry-based learning and those who did not use computers. When viewed from individual scores, the results of the study showed little progress. The results of the observation show that not all students like to read while listening to audio.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Afandi, Junanto, T., & Afriani, R. (2016). Implementasi digital-age literacy dalam pendidikan abad 21 di Indonesia [The implementation of digital-age literacy in the 21st century education in Indonesia]. Paper presented at Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains, Universitas Negeri Surakarta, Surakarta.
Ahmad, A. (2011). Hakikat metode inkuiri [The principle of inquiry method]. Makassar: Universitasas Negeri Makasar.
Alaghbary, G. S. (2018). The compleat lexical tutor as a resource for teachers of poetry. Language and Language Teaching, 17(1), 30-36.
Alharbi, M. A. (2016). Using different types of dictionaries for improving EFL reading comprehension and vocabulary learning. JALT CALL Journal, 12(2), 123-149.
Amer, A. A. (1997). The effect of teacher’s reading aloud on the reading comprehension of EFL students. ELT Journal, 51, 43-47.
Arikunto, S. (2006). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktek [Research procedure: A practical approach]. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Askildson, L. R. (2011). Theory and pedagogy of reading while listening: Phonological recoding for L2 reading development. Journal of Linguistics and Language Teaching, 2(2), 267-286
Charles, M. (2007). Reconciling top-down and bottom-up approaches to graduate writing: Using a corpus to teach rhetorical functions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(4), 289–302.
Chen, H. H.-J. (2011). Developing and evaluating an oral skills training website. ReCALL, 23(1), 59–78.
Chen, Y. (2012). Dictionary use and vocabulary learning in the context of reading. International Journal of Lexicography, 25(2), 216–247.
Cobb, T. (1999). Breadth and depth of vocabulary acquisition with hands-on concordancing. Computer Assisted Language Learning 12, 345-360.
Cobb, T., Greaves, C., & Horst, M. (2001). Peut-on augmenter le rythme d’acquisition lexicale par la lecture? Une expérience de lecture en français appuyée sur une série de ressources en ligne [Can we increase the rate of lexical acquisition by reading? A reading experience in French supported by a series of online resources]. In Regards sur la Didactique des Langues Secondes (pp. 133-153). Montréal: Editions Logique.
Cobb, T. (2015). Technology for teaching reading. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, 5(1), 1–7.
De Boer, A., Du Toit, P. H., Scheepers, D. M., & Bothma, T. J. D. (2013). Whole brain learningin higher education: Practice-based evidence. Oxford: Chandos.
DePotter, B. (2009). The application of student-centered interactive teaching in english video, listening & speaking class. Computer-Assisted Foreign Language Education, 14(2), 54–58.
Dimyati & Mudjiono. (2016). Belajar dan pembelajaran [learning and teaching]. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Dziemianko, A. (2012). Why one and two do not make three: Dictionary form revisited. Lexikos, 22, 195–216.
Folse, K. (2004). Vocabulary myths: Applying second language research to classroom teaching. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Gilakjani, A. P. (2014). A detailed analysis over some important issues towards using computer technology into the EFL classrooms. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2(2), 146–153.
Gilbert, L. M., Williams, R. L., & McLaughlin, T. F. (1996). Use of assisted reading to increase correct reading rates and decrease error rates of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29(2), 255-257.
Hardman, J. (2019). Towards a pedagogical model of teaching with ICTs for mathematics attainment in primary school: A review of studies 2008–2018. Heliyon, 5(5), e01726.
Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of language teaching. London: Pearson Longman.
Hrastinski, S. (2019). What do we mean by blended learning? TechTrends, 63(5), 564–569.
Koskinen, P. S., Blum, I. H., Bisson, S. A., Phillips, S. M., Creamer, T. S., & Baker, T. K. (2000). Book access, shared reading, and audio models: The effects of supporting the literacy learning of linguistically diverse students in school and at home. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 23-36.
Kuhlthau, C. C., Maniotes, L. K., & Caspari, A. K. (2017). Guided inquiry: Learning in 21st century school. Boston: Greenwood Publishing Group.
Kunlun, Z. (2007). The application of student-centered interactive teaching in English video, listening & speaking class. Computer Assisted Foreign Language Education, 14(2), 54-58.
McMahon, M. L. (1983). Development of reading-while-listening skills in the primary grades. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 38-52.
Merta, N. (2019). Penerapan model pembelajaran inquiry-based teaching untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar bahasa Inggris [The implementation of inquiry-based learning model to improve English learning achievement]. Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 2(2), 228-238.
Mina, C., & Glenberg. (2004). Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies. New York: Lawrence eralbum associates.
Muslaini. (2017). Strategies for teaching reading comprehension. English Education Journal, 8(1), 67-78.
Peachey, N. (2005). Concordancers in ELT. British Council Teaching English. Retrieved from http://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/think/ articles/concordancers-elt
Ramasari, M. (2020). Teaching reading comprehension for the tenth grade students by applying an approach of inquiry-based on learning. Jurnal Perspektif Pendidikan, 14(1), 46-57.
Riasati, M. J., Allahyar, N., & Tan, K. E. (2012). Technology in language education: Benefits and barriers. Journal of Education and Practice, 3(5), 25–30.
Sanjaya, W. (2006). Strategi pembelajaran [Learning strategy]. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group
Sanjaya, W. (2008). Strategi pembelajaran berorientasi standar proses pendidikan [Educational process-standard teaching strategy]. Jakarta: Kencana Perdana Media Group.
Sanjaya, W. (2012). Strategi pembelajaran berorientasi standar proses pendidikan [Educational process-standard teaching strategy]. Jakarta: Kencana.
Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal Education in a Knowledge Society. Chicago: Open Court
Slavin, R. (2000). Using student team learning (4th ed). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, Center for Social Organization of Schools.
Syamsuar, S., & Refliantor, R. (2018). Pendidikan dan tantangan pembelajaran berbasis teknologi informasi di era revolusi industri 4.0 [Education and challeges of information technology-based teaching in the era of industrial revolution 4.0]. E-Tech, 6(2), 1-13.
Teo, T., Chai, S. C., Hung, D., & Lee, C. B. (2008). Beliefs about teaching and uses of technology among pre- service teachers. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 36(2), 163-174.
Yang, Y. (2010). Developing a reciprocal teaching/learning system for college remedial reading instruction. Computers & Education, 55(3), 33–40.
Yunus, M. M., Salehi, H., & Chenzi, C. (2012). Integrating social networking tools into ESL writing classroom: Strengths and weaknesses. English Language Teaching, 5(8), 42-48.
Yusniarsi, P. (2019). Pengaruh computer-assisted language learning (call) terhadap kemampuan reading comprehension mahasiswa program studi teknik informatika di Universitas Islam Balitar [The influence of computer-assisted learning (CALL) on students’ reading comprehension skills at the Study Program of Informatics at Universitas Islam Balitar]. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 11(12), 189-197.
Woodall, B. (2010). Simultaneous listening and reading in ESL: Helping second language learners read (and enjoy reading) more efficiently. TESOL Journal, 1(2), 186–205.
Wu, J. G. (2019). the use of mobile devices in language learning: a survey on Chinese university learners’ experiences. CALL-EJ, 20(3), 6-20.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/eej.v13i1.25164
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 19 timesPDF - 8 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
P-ISSN: 2085-3750
E-ISSN: 3025-9789
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.