Page Header

  • Home
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Categories
  • Search
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • SUBMISSION
  • TDMRC
Home > Vol 5, No 3 (2022) > Gong

 

About The Authors

Ruishan Gong
Institute for Risk and Disaster Reduction (IRDR), Faculty of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University College London (UCL)
United Kingdom

Naif R Alrehaili orcid
Institute for Risk and Disaster Reduction (IRDR), Faculty of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University College London (UCL)
United Kingdom

Publisher:

TDMRC Universitas Syiah Kuala

E-ISSN: 2527-4341

 P-ISSN: 2808-439X

Flood Preparedness in United Kingdom and China: A Comparison Study Focusing on Social and Economic Factors

Ruishan Gong, Naif R Alrehaili

Abstract

The paper aims to explore the social and economic factors influencing the flood preparedness of Zhengzhou, China and Leeds, United Kingdom residents. As one of the chosen areas, Zhengzhou experienced a terrible flood with an inaccurate weather forecast and little pre-flood preparedness in July 2021. On the other hand, Leeds has a long history of frequent floods. Wetter winters and stormy weather caused by climate change led to increased floods in Leeds. The consistent seasonal floods keep damaging residents and their properties, leading to economic losses. The authors conducted semi-structured interviews with residents who experienced floods in Zhengzhou and Leeds. Comparative parameters included economic and social, as these factors are hugely different in the study areas. The results showed that factors like education influence the households’ flood preparedness; likewise, economic factors like disposable income also affect the willingness of residents to spend on flood preparedness. Furthermore, the results revealed that with proactive flood management, both communities progressed in minimising the post-adverse effects of floods.

 Keywords

flood; preparedness; economic; social; factors; Zhengzhou; Leeds

 Full Text:

PDF

References

Alberici, C. (2022). China in respect to Hofstede’s Cultural dimensions model, lesson 10, viewed 21 August 2022, from https://sites.psu.edu/global/2016/10/29/china-in-respect-to-hofstedes-cultural-dimensions-model-lesson-10/.

Alexander, D., & Alexander, D. E. (2000). Confronting catastrophe: new perspectives on natural disasters. Oxford University Press, USA.

Alexander, D. E. (2013). Resilience and disaster risk reduction: an etymological journey, Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 13, 2707–2716, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-2707-2013.

Chan, J. and Liao, K. (2022). The normative dimensions of flood risk management: Two types of flood harm, Journal of Flood Risk Management 15(2).

Data.worldbank.org. (2022) Data for United Kingdom, China | Data, viewed 27 August 2022, from https://data.worldbank.org/?locations=GB-CN.

Data.worldbank.org. (2022). Gini index - United Kingdom, China | Data, viewed 27 August 2022, from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.GINI?end=2019&locations=GB-CN&start=2003.

GuyCarpenter. (2022). Post Event Report: Henan Flood, July 17-21. viewed 12 July 2022, from https://www.guycarp.com/insights/2021/07/post-event-report-henan-flood-july-17-21.html.

Hofstede Insights. (2022). Compare countries - Hofstede Insights, viewed 20 August 2022, from https://www.hofstede-insights.com/fi/product/compare-countries/.

Klein, R., Nicholls, R. & Thomalla, F. (2003). Resilience to natural hazards: How useful is this concept?, Global Environmental Change Part B: Environmental Hazards 5(1-2), 35-45.

Kobayashi, Y. & Porter, J. (2022). Flood Risk Management in the People's Republic of China: Learning to Live with Flood Risk, Asian Development Bank. viewed 20 August 2022, from https://www.adb.org/publications/flood-risk-management-peoples-republic-china-learning-live-flood-risk.

Majd, P., Torani, S., Maroufi, S., Dowlati, M. & Sheikhi, R. (2019). The importance of education on disasters and emergencies, Journal of Education and Health Promotion 8(1), 85.

Mitrović, V., O’Mathúna, D. & Nola, I. (2019). Ethics and Floods: A Systematic Review. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness 13(4), 817-82.

Opdenakker, R. (2006). Advantages and Disadvantages of Four Interview Techniques in Qualitative Research, Forum Qualitative social Research 7(4).

Robinson, S. (2022). Interview Sampling by Beverly Peters, viewed 26 July 2022, from https://aea365.org/blog/interview-sampling-by-beverly peters/#:~:text=Evaluators%20use%20different%20sampling%20techniques,often%20use%20is%20snowball%20sampling.

Shu, L. & Finlayson, B. (2018). Flood management on the lower Yellow River: hydrological and geomorphological perspectives. Sedimentary Geology 85(1-4), 285-296.

Weichselgartner, J., & Obersteiner, M. (2002). Knowing sufficient and applying more: challenges in hazards management. Global Environmental Change Part B: Environmental Hazards 4(2), 73-77.

Wu, Z., Xue, W., Xu, H., Yan, D., Wang, H., & Qi, W. (2022). Urban Flood Risk Assessment in Zhengzhou, China, Based on a D-Number-Improved Analytic Hierarchy Process and a Self-Organizing Map Algorithm. Remote Sensing, 14(19), 4777.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/ijdm.v5i3.28854

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Ruishan Gong, Naif R Alrehaili Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Journal Content

Browse
  • By Issue
  • By Author
  • By Title
  • Other Journals
  • Categories
User

Indexed in:

        

Tools:

Visitors: 

 

Template:

Font Size

Keywords COVID-19 Indonesia attitude climate change community coping strategies disaster disaster management disaster mitigation disaster preparedness disaster risk reduction earthquake emergency preparedness institutional effectiveness knowledge local wisdom natural disaster preparedness resilience tsunami vulnerability
Article Tools
Abstract
Print this article
Indexing metadata
How to cite item
Finding References
Review policy
Email this article (Login required)
Email the author (Login required)
Open Journal Systems