Disaster Capitalism within Aviation Industry: Putting Corporate Profits Ahead of Safety
Abstract
It is predicted that Indonesia will soon serve more than 140 million passengers a year. However, the safety records of the aviation industry have not shown a significant progress. Airlines operated in Indonesia has repeatedly experienced serious accidents killed hundreds of passengers and crew. The purpose of this study is to explore corporate communications related to safety culture. This study is concerned with the ideological role played by language in the discursive construction of safety culture. Using Thompson’s (1990) schema regarding the modes of ideology, this study analyzes annual reports of two airlines operated in Indonesia published in the last fourteen years to establish the linguistic strategies used in their communications related to safety culture. The results suggest that the companies used particular linguistic strategies in their communication of safety culture to advance the worldviews of economic efficiency and cost control based on capitalist logic. The prioritization of business growth may contribute to avoiding allocating resources on aspect that is matter most. Given high expectation of safety standards of the aviation industry, the findings have clear and significant implications. It is recommended that aviation industry must improve their safety cultures to prevent unnecessary accidents in the future.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Amernic, J. H., & Craig, R. J. (2004). 9/11 in the service of corporate rhetoric: Southwest Airlines’ 2001 letter to shareholders. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 28(4), 325-341. (https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859904267)
Amernic, J., & Craig, R. (2017). CEO speeches and safety culture: British Petroleum before the Deepwater Horizon disaster. Critical perspectives on accounting, 47, 61-80.
Antonsen, S. (2009). The relationship between culture and safety on offshore supply vessels. Safety science, 47(8), 1118-1128. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2016.11.004)
Arvidsson, S. (2023). CEO talk of sustainability in CEO letters: towards the inclusion of a sustainability embeddedness and value-creation perspective. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 14(7), 26-61. (https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-07-2021-0260)
Beattie, V. (2014). Accounting narratives and the narrative turn in accounting research: Issues, theory, methodology, methods and a research framework. The British Accounting Review, 46(2), 111-134. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.05.001)
Beelitz, A., & Merkl-Davies, D. M. (2012). Using discourse to restore organisational legitimacy: ‘CEO-speak’after an incident in a German nuclear power plant. Journal of Business Ethics, 108, 101-120. (https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-011-1065-9)
Blazsin, H., & Guldenmund, F. (2015). The social construction of safety: Comparing three realities. Safety science, 71, 16-27. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.06.001)
Brasier, K. J. (2002). Ideology and discourse: Characterizations of the 1996 farm bill by agricultural interest groups. Agriculture and Human Values, 19(3), 239-253. (https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019913920983)
Collison, D., Dey, C., Hannah, G., & Stevenson, L. (2010). Anglo-American capitalism: the role and potential role of social accounting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23(8), 956-981. (https://doi.org/10.1108/09513571011092510)
Collison, D., Ferguson, J., Kozuma, Y., Power, D., & Stevenson, L. (2011). The impact of introductory accounting courses on student perceptions about the purpose of accounting information and the objectives of business: A comparison of the UK and Japan. Accounting Forum, 35(1), 47-60. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2011.01.001)
Cox, S. J., & Cheyne, A. J. (2000). Assessing safety culture in offshore environments. Safety science, 34(1-3), 111-129. (https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00009-6)
Eagleton, T. (1991). Ideology: an introduction (Vol. 9). London: Cambridge Univ Press.
Edwards, J. R., Davey, J., & Armstrong, K. (2013). Returning to the roots of culture: A review and re-conceptualisation of safety culture. Safety science, 55, 70-80. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.01.004)
Ferguson, J., Collison, D., Power, D., & Stevenson, L. (2009). Constructing meaning in the service of power: An analysis of the typical modes of ideology in accounting textbooks. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 20(8), 896-909. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2009.02.002)
Ferguson, J., Sales de Aguiar, T. R., & Fearfull, A. (2016). Corporate response to climate change: language, power and symbolic construction. Accounting, auditing & accountability journal, 29(2), 278-304.
Germain, J. (202). What Is Disaster Capitalism? A Cycle of Crisis, Exploitation, and Privatization, TeenVogue, access on April 30: https://www.teenvogue.com/story/what-is-disaster-capitalism.
Irsyadillah, I., Ahmed, A. H., & ElKelish, W. W. (2021). Do Accounting Textbooks Inculcate Global Mindsets: An Analysis of Textbooks Adopted in Indonesia. Journal of Teaching in International Business, 32(3-4), 262-283. (https://doi.org/10.1080/08975930.2022.2033665)
Klein, N. (2007), The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism. London: Allen Lane.
Lee, T., & Harrison, K. (2000). Assessing safety culture in nuclear power stations. Safety science, 34(1-3), 61-97. (https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00007-2)
Mäkelä, H., & Laine, M. (2011). A CEO with many messages: Comparing the ideological representations provided by different corporate reports. Accounting Forum, 35(4), 217-231. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2011.06.008)
Pidgeon, N., & O’Leary, M. (2017). Organizational safety culture: Implications for aviation practice. In Aviation psychology in practice (pp. 21-43). Routledge.
Silbey, S. S. (2009). Taming Prometheus: Talk about safety and culture. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 341-369. (https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134707)
Thompson, J. B. (1990). Ideology and modern culture: critical theory in the era of mass communication. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.