Law And Morality: The Hart And Fuller Debate

Bakti Bakti, M. Arfan Tarigan

Abstract


This paper aims to explain how the relationship between law and morality in the H.L Hart and Fuller debate. The relationship between law and morality in the development of legal science is inseparable from legal and morality debates. Legal positivism scientists place law and morals separately, while natural law scientists place law and morals as inseparable. In this case, the author tries to recall how the post-World War II conditions were shocked by the debate between British legal scientists and American legal scientists, namely H.L.A Hart and Lon Fuller.

Keywords


Law, Morality, and Legal Science

Full Text:

PDF

References


Dyzenhaus, D. (2008) 'The Grudge Informer', New York University Law Review , 593(1958), pp. 1000–1034.

Fuller, LL (1958) 'Positivism and Fidelity to Law: A Reply to Professor Hart', Harvard Law Review , 71(4), pp. 630–672.

Fuller, LL (1969) The Morality of Law Revised Edition .

Haldemann, F. (2005) 'Gustav Radbruch vs. Hans Kelsen: A Debate on Nazi Law*', Ratio Juris , 18(2), pp. 162–178. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9337.2005.00293.x.

Suri Ratnapala (2009) Jurisprudence , Cambridge University Press .




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/sklj.v6i2.29123

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Copyright (c) 2022 Syiah Kuala Law Journal

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 

Creative Commons License

Syiah Kuala Law Journal published by Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Syiah Kuala is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Based on a work at http://jurnal.usk.ac.id/SKLJ.