The Lawrence Friedman's Construction of the Legal System Regarding Essential Equality Regulations in Trademark Rights
Abstract
The legal system plays a fundamental role in ensuring certainty and legal protection for parties, including in the field of intellectual property rights such as trademarks. Trademarks are part of the intellectual property rights protected by law in Indonesia, with the regulation on the essence of equivalence being one of the important issues to consider. This research aims to analyze the construction of Lawrence Friedman's legal system related to the regulation of equivalence in essence in trademarks in Indonesia, as well as the factors influencing the effectiveness of implementing this concept in practice. In this study, a normative legal research method is used with a legislative approach. The research will focus on the examination of law from an internal perspective with its object being legal norms, and will use primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources. The research findings indicate that the construction of Lawrence Friedman's legal system related to the regulation of equivalence in essence in trademarks in Indonesia faces several challenges in terms of legal structure, legal substance, and legal culture. In terms of legal structure, there are differences in interpretation and inconsistency in the decisions of related institutions, such as the Directorate General of Intellectual Property, Commercial Courts, and the Supreme Court. In terms of legal substance, the regulation regarding equivalence in essence still creates uncertainty, especially in the interpretation of equivalence criteria. Meanwhile, from a legal cultural perspective, the understanding and attitudes of stakeholders and the inconsistent law enforcement practices pose their own challenges. Several factors influence the effectiveness of implementing the concept of equivalence in essence in trademarks in Indonesia, including: (1) Legal structure factors, which include the performance and capacity of related institutions such as the Directorate General of Intellectual Property, Commercial Courts, and the Supreme Court; (2) Legal substance factors, namely the clarity of definitions and criteria for assessing "equivalence in essence" in legislation and its ability to accommodate technological developments; (3) Legal cultural factors, which encompass the understanding and attitudes of parties (trademark holders, trademark applicants, the public) towards the concept of equivalence in essence; and (4) Coordination among related institutions in the implementation of the concept of equivalence in essence.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Afif, M. S., & Sugiyono, H. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pemegang Merek Terkenal Di Indonesia. Jurnal USM Law Review, 4(2), 565. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v4i2.4097
Anugrah, S. (2019). Unsur Persamaan Pada Pokoknya Dalam Pendaftaran Merek Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek Dan Indikasi Geografis Dan Penerapannya Dalam Praktik Dihubungkan Dengan Pelanggaran Terhadap Merek Terkenal. Aktualita (Jurnal Hukum), 2(1), 18–37. https://doi.org/10.29313/aktualita.v2i1.4663
Asshagab, S. M. (2009). Pembuktian Unsur Itikad Tidak Baik dalam Sengketa Merek di Pengadilan Niaga pada Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat. Universitas Indonesia. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.12136.39687
Asuan, A. (2022). Pendaftaran Hak Atas Merek. Solusi, 20(1), 135–160. https://doi.org/10.36546/solusi.v20i1.533
Butarbutar, E. N. (2018). Metode Penelitian Hukum Langkah-Langkah Untuk Menemukan Kebenaran Dalam Ilmu Hukum. PT Refika Aditama.
Erlina. (2013). Penegakan Hukum Kekayaan Intelektual. CV Anugrah Utama Raharja.
Erlina, Jainah, Z. O., Seftiniara, I. N., & Safitri, M. (2022). PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM EKSPRESI BUDAYA TRADISIONAL. UBL Press.
Erlina, Safitri, M., & Seftiniara, I. N. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Indikasi Geografis. Pusaka Media.
Fatimah, S. (2020). Tinjauan Yuridis Sengketa Persamaan Merek Pada Pokoknya Antara Pt Kalimantan Steel Melawan Pt Indo Metal Tech Products Dan Pd Berkat Jaya (Studi Putusan NO 234 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2015). UIN Syarif Hidayatullah.
Gultom, M. H. (2018). PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PEMEGANG HAK MEREK TERDAFTAR TERHADAP PELANGGARAN MEREK. Jurnal Warta Dharmawangsa, 56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46576/wdw.v0i56.14
Hairi, P. J. (2011). Antara Prinsip Peradilan Sederhana, Cepat dan Berbiaya Ringan dan Gagasan Pembatasan Perkara Kasasi. Jurnal Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Dan Kesejahteraan, 2(1). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.22212/jnh.v2i1.190
Hidayatullah, I. E., Soputan, M., & Korah, R. S. M. (2023). Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Pendaftaran Merek Dengan Pelanggaran Kesamaan Nama Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek Dan Indikasi Geografis. Lex Privatum, XII(3).
J. Moleong, L. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Makmur, S. (2015). Budaya Hukum Dalam Masyarakat Multikultural. SALAM: Jurnal Sosial Dan Budaya Syar-I, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v2i2.2387
Marzuki, P. M. (2021). Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi. Kencana.
Masjupri. (2022). Perlindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Di Indonesia. Gerbang Media Aksara.
Murjiyanto, R. (2016). KONSEP Kepemilikan Hak Atas Merek Di Indon~Sia (Stud1 Pergeseran Sistem “Deklaratif’’ Ke Dalam Sistem "Konstitutif’).” Universitas Islam Indonesia.
Mustafa, M. E. (2020). Prinsip-Prinsip Beracara Dalam Penegakan Hukum Paten di Indonesia Dikaitkan Dengan Trip’s-WTO. PT. Alumni.
Nursadi, H. (2012). Sistem Hukum Indonesia. Universitas Terbuka. https://jdih.situbondokab.go.id/barang/buku/30. Sistem Hukum Indonesia by Harsanto Nursadi (z-lib.org).pdf
Nusale, Y. G., Berlianty, T., & Pesulima, T. L. (2023). Pembatalan Merek Terdaftar Yang Memiliki Persamaan Nama Pada Pokoknya. Pattimura Law Study Review, 1(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47268/palasrev.v1i1.10853
Pahlevi, F. (2022). Pemberantasan Korupsi di Indonesia Perspektif Legal System Lawrence M. Freidmen. El-Dusturie, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.21154/eldusturie.v1i1.4097
Pahusa, D. (2015). Persamaan Unsur Pokok Pada Suatu Merek Terkenal (Analisis Putusan MA Nomor 162 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2014). Jurnal Cita Hukum, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v2i1.1848
Rafif, M., & Adlhiyati, Z. (2023). Tinjauan Penerapan E-Court Di Pengadilan Negeri Yogyakarta Berdasarkan Teori Hukum Lawrence M. Friedman. Jurnal Verstek, 11(4). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v11i4.76143
Rifai, T. P. (2017). Kesiapan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek Dan Indikasi Geografis Dalam Menghadapi Masyarakat Ekonomi ASEAN. FIAT JUSTISIA:Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 10(4), 733. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v10no4.809
Saraswati, I. A. K. I. N., & R., I. (2019). Pembatalan Merek Karena Adanya Kesamaan Konotasi Dengan Merek Lain Yang Telah Terdaftar. Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum, 7(4), 1. https://doi.org/10.24843/KM.2019.v07.i04.p07
Sekjen KY RI. (2017). Etika dan Budaya Hukum dalam Peradilan. Sekretariat Jenderal Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia.
Semaun, S. (2011). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Rahasia Dagang. DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum, 9(1), 30–42.
Sihombing, S., & Aminah. (2023). Sengketa Merek Strong dan Penggunaan Kata Umum pada Merek Dagang (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung 332 K/ Pdt.SusHki/2021). Unes Law Review, 6(2).
Sudjana, S. (2020). Akibat Hukum Penghapusan Dan Pembatalan Merek Terdaftar Terhadap Hak Atas Merek (Eletion and Cancellation of Registered Marks in The Perspective of Legal Certainty). Res Nullius Law Journal, 2(2), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.34010/rnlj.v2i2.3076
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.
Sumanti, J. J., Kalalo, M. E., & Mamengko, R. (2022). Akibat Hukum Pemakaian Merek Yang Memiliki Persamaan Pada Pokoknya Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek Dan Indikasi Geografis. Lex Privatum, 10(2).
Yolanda, N. (2019). Upaya-Upaya Peningkatan Pemahaman Dan Kesadaran Pencipta Karya Seni Tradisional Terhadap Hak Ciptanya. Solusi, 17(1), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.36546/solusi.v17i1.148
Yuliyanto. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Atas Merek Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek Dan Indikasi Geografis. Universitas Darul Ulum Islamic Sentre Sudirman GUPPI.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/sklj.v7i2.38266
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 0 timesPDF - 0 times
Copyright (c) 2024 Syiah Kuala Law Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
