QUO VADIS PROCEDURAL LAW OF POSITIVE FICTITIOUS APPLICATION TO OBTAIN A DECISION AFTER THE ENACTMENT OF THE COPYRIGHT ACT
Abstract
In modern governance, state administrative decisions (KTUN) play an important role as an administrative tool to support the implementation of government functions that have been regulated in the State Administrative Justice Law. The authority of the State Administrative Court to examine, hear and decide on positive fictitious applications is eliminated or replaced, the authority will be further regulated in a presidential regulation but until now the presidential regulation has not been issued and causes legal uncertainty or legal vacuum. As a normative legal research with statutory, case, and conceptual approaches, this article aims to examine how the transformation of the concept of positive fictitious, analyze its impact on legal certainty, and offer alternative policies to overcome the legal vacuum in the application of positive fictitious mechanisms in Indonesia by comparing it with France and the Netherlands. Conclusively, the research results in this article show that after the enactment of the Job Creation Law, the concept of positive fictitious decision application has undergone a major change, namely the elimination of the authority of the State Administrative Court (PTUN). In addition, this paper also compares the implementation of similar mechanisms in several other countries to find perspectives that can be adopted. In the context of the rule of law and welfare state, the government must optimize its role to ensure public access to fair and transparent administrative decisions.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
A. Legislation
Law Number 5 of 1986 concerning State Administrative Courts, LN 1986 No. 77 as amended several times lastly by Law Number 51 of 2009 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 5 of 1986 concerning State Administrative Courts, LN 2009 No. 160.
Law Number 11 of 2020 on Job Creation, LN of 2020 No. 245, TLN No. 6573.
Law Number 12 of 2011 on the Establishment of Laws and Regulations, LN 2011 No. 82 TLN No. 5234, as last amended by Law (UU) Number 13 of 2022 on the Second Amendment to Law Number 12 of 2011 on the Establishment of Laws and Regulations, LN.2022 No.143, TLN No.6801.
Law Number 30 Year 2014 on Government Administration, LN Year 2014 No. 292 TLN No. 5601.
Law No. 48 of 2009 on Judicial Power. LN. 2009 No. 157, TLN No. 5076.
Government Regulation in Lieu of Law (Perpu) Number 2 of 2022 on Job Creation, LN 2022 No.238, TLN No.6841 as stipulated by Law Number 6 of 2023 on Stipulating Perpu Number 2 of 2022 on Job Creation into Law, LN.2023 No.41, TLN No.6856.
Supreme Court Circular Letter Number 5 of 2021 concerning the Implementation of the Formulation of the Results of the Plenary Meeting of the Supreme Court Chamber in 2021 as Guidelines for the Implementation of Tasks for the Courts.
B. Court Decision
State Administrative Court Pekan Baru. Decision Number. 1/P/FP/2021/PTUN.PBR. PT Mega Green Technology v. Head of Dumai City Land Office (2021).
Surabaya State Administrative Court. Decision Number. 17/P/FP/2020/PTUN.Sby. Mohamad Khasbi v. Head of the National Land Agency (2020).
Surabaya State Administrative Court. Decision Number. 19/P/FP/2020/PTUN.Sby. Zuhrotul v. Head of Leran Village (2021).
Surabaya State Administrative Court. Decision Number. 20/P/FP/2020/PTUN.Sby. R. Soedarto v. Lurah Kelurahan Asem Rowo (2021).
Surabaya State Administrative Court. Decision Number. 9/P/FP/2020/PTUN.Sby. Rasyid v. Sumenep Education Office (2021).
C. Books
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Matters of Law. Jakarta: Constitution Press and PT Syaami Cipta Media, 2006.
Atmosudirjo, S. Prajudi. State Administrative Law. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 1994.
Basah, Sjachran. Existence and Benchmarks of State Administrative Justice in Indonesia. Bandung: Alumni, 1997.
Garner, Byran A. (Editor in Chief). Black's Law Dictionary. St. Paul Minn: West Group, 1999.
Hadjon, Philipus M. and Tatiek Sri Djatmiati. Legal Argumentation. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 2016.
Ibrahim, Johny. Theory & Methodology of Normative Legal Research. cet. III. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing, 2007.
Indroharto. Understanding the Law on State Administrative Courts: Book II Procedure in the State Administrative Court. Jakarta: Sinar Harapan Library, 2015.
Koentjoro, Diana Halim. State Administrative Law. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia, 2004.
Marbun, SF. and Moh Mahfud MD. Principles of State Administration Law. 6th Printing. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2006.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Legal Research. Ctk. Second. Jakarta: Kencana, 2008.
Rahardjo, Satjipto. The Science of Law. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya, 2004.
Ridwan. Three Dimensions of Administrative Law and Administrative Justice. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press. 2009.
Scholler, Heinrich. Notes on Constitutional Interpretation. Jakarta: Hans Seidel Foundation, 2004.
Simanjuntak, Enrico. Procedural Law of State Administrative Courts: Transformation & Reflection. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2018.
Simorangkir, JCT et al. Legal Dictionary. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika Publisher, 2008.
Soeprapto, Maria Farida Indrati. The Science of Legislation. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2007.
Sulaiman, King Faisal.Theory of Legislation and its Testing Aspects. Yogyakarta: Thafa Media, 2017.
D. Journals, Research Reports, and Seminars
Fahmal, Muin. "General Principles of Proper Government, Good Governance as an Instrument of Clean Government". Delivered at the ceremony of accepting the position of permanent professor in the field of Constitutional Law and State Administration Law at the Faculty of Law, Universitas Muslim Indonesia, 2006.
Graaf, N. G. de K. J. & Hoogstra. "Silence Is Golden? Tacit Authorizations in the Netherlands, Germany and France". Review of European Administrative Law. Vol. 6, No. 2 (2013). Page. 7.
Irvansyah, Andika Risqi. "The Legal Position of Positive Fictitious Decisions Since the Enactment of the Job Creation Law". APHTN-HAN Journal (2022). Page. 210.
Kurniawaty, Yuniar. "The Use of Discretion in the Formation of Legal Products", Indonesian Legislation Journal Vol. 13 No. 01 (March 2016). Page. 59
Nora, Azza Azka. "Contradiction of Negative Fictitious and Positive Fictitious Norms and Their Contextualization According to the Government Administration Law". Peratun Law Journal Vol. 3 No. 2 (August 2020). Page. 146.
Parisio, Vera. "The Italian Administrative Procedure Act and Public Authorities' Silence". Hamline Law Review. Vol. 36, No. 1 (2013). Page. 10.
Center for Research and Case Studies, and Library Management of the Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court. "Implications of Law Number 11 of 2020 on Job Creation for Government Administration and Administrative Dispute Resolution Based on the Conception of the Rule of Law". Cooperation between the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia and the Faculty of Law, Andalas University (2021). Page. 40.
Rodding, Budiamin. "Negative Fictitious and Positive Fictitious Decisions in Improving the Quality of Public Services". Tanjungpura Law Journal. Vol. 1 No. 1 (2017). pp. 31-32.
Simanjuntak, Enrico. "Positive Fictitious Cases and Their Legal Problems". Journal of Law and Justice. Vol. 6 No. 3 (November 2017). Page. 379.
Simanjuntak, Enrico. "Prospects of Positive Fictitious Principles in Supporting Ease of Doing Business in Indonesia". Rechtsvinding Journal. Vol. 7 No. 2 (August 2018). Page. 314.
Solechan. "General Principles of Good Governance in Public Services", Institute of Research and Community Services Diponegoro University. Administrative Law and Governance Journal (2019).
Suhariyanto, Budi. "The Intersection of the Authority to Adjudicate Abuse of Discretion between Administrative Court and Corruption Court". Journal of Law and Justice (2) (2018). Research and Development Center for Law and Justice of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
Teguh, Bagus S. et al. "Fictive Positive Decision As A Form of Bureaucratic Reform Based on The Good Governance Principles". Peratun Law Journal. Vol. 1 No. 1 (February 2018). Page 119.
Wairocana, I Gusti Ngurah et al. "Constraints and Methods of State Administrative Court Judges After the Government Administration Law: An Approach to the Handling of Positive Fictitious Cases". Journal of Law & Development. Vol. 50 No. 3 (July-September 2020). Page. 567.
E. Internet
European Union. "Services Directive Explanations And Practical Examples". Available at http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/14961/attachments/2/ translations/en/renditions/native. Accessed October 18, 2023.
Public Relations of the Constitutional Court. "Job Creation Law, Realization of Presidential Discretion". Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia. September 7, 2023. Available at https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Berita&id=19508&menu=2. Accessed on October 20, 2023.
Irvansyah, Andika Risqi. "Looking for the Existence of the Concept of Positive Fictitious Decisions After the Enactment of the Job Creation Law". Faculty of Law, Airlangga University. May 17, 2022. Available at https://fh.unair.ac.id/mencari-eksistensi-konsep-keputusan-fiktif-positif-setelah-pengundangan-undang-undang-cipta-kerja/. Accessed on October 22, 2023.
Mardatillah, Aida. "Negative Fictitious and Positive Fictitious and its Development in the Job Creation Law". Hukumonline. July 28, 2022. Available at https://www.hukumonline.com/stories/article/lt62e0f25c43de5/fiktif-negatif-dan-fiktif-positif-serta-perkembangannya-dalam-uu-cipta-kerja/. Accessed on October 19, 2023.
Pratiwi, ST Dwi Adiyah. "Positive Fiktif versus Public Service Standards". Ombusdman Republic of Indonesia. October 5, 2022. Available at https://ombudsman.go.id/perwakilan/news/r/pwkinternal--fiktif-positif-versus-standar-pelayanan-publik. Accessed on October 20, 2023.
Sari, Novita Indah. "Positive Fictitious Decree as an Object of Dispute at PTUN After the Enactment of PERPPU on Job Creation". Doni Budiono & Rekan Civil Partnership. January 12, 2023. Available at https://pdb-lawfirm.id/keputusan-fiktif-positif-sebagai-objek-sengketa-di-ptun-pasca-berlakunya-perppu-cipta-kerja/. Accessed on October 20, 2023.
F. Miscellaneous
European Council, "Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on services in the internal market", December 12, 2006.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/sklj.v9i1.44799
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 0 timesPDF - 0 times
Copyright (c) 2025 Syiah Kuala Law Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
