Deixis in English Islamic Friday sermons: A pragma-discourse analysis

Asim Ayed Alkhawaldeh

Abstract


Although deixis has received increasingly academic attention in linguistic research, its use in sermons, particularly in the Islamic context, has been largely underexplored. Therefore, this paper examined deixis in Islamic Friday sermons from the perspective of pragmatics and discourse analysis. Drawing on Levinson’s Framework, it aimed at analyzing three main types of deixis (personal, temporal, and spatial), focusing on their forms, features, functions, and frequency. The data were a corpus of 70 sermons compiled by the researcher from various online websites. The study employed qualitative and quantitative methods to meet the purpose of the study. The findings revealed that these three deictic types were relatively common in the language of the respective corpus with the personal type being predominant, deictically pointing to different referents whose interpretation was sensitive to the context in which they occurred. As an affectively powerful tool in the corpus, the preachers utilized deixis to serve a wide variety of functions on the discourse and pragmatic levels. In the corpus, deictic expressions worked as a discourse strategy to persuade the listeners by drawing their attention and engaging them in the message of the sermon and to signal and organize the flow of information in the ongoing discourse. They also served to enhance togetherness, intimacy, and politeness between the preachers and their audience. This study is hoped to present a good basis for further linguistic investigation of deixis in other languages and religions to illuminate how deictics work in sermonic discourse. 


Keywords


Friday sermon; personal deixis; spatial deixis; temporal deixis

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdulameer, T. A. S. A. (2019). A pragmatic analysis of deixis in a religious text. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(2), 292-306. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v9n2p292

Adegoju, A. (2014). Person deixis as discursive practice in Nigeria’s “June 12” conflict rhetoric. Ghana Journal of Linguistics, 1(3), 45-64. https://doi.org/10.4314/gjl.v3i1.2

Adetunji, A. (2006). Inclusion and exclusion in political discourse: Deixis in Olusegun Obasanjo’s speeches. Journal of Language and Linguistics, 5(2), 177-191.

Akhimien, P. E., & Farotimi, Y. (2018). A study of the conversational features and discourse strategies in select sermons of Pastor E. A. Adeboye. American Journal of Linguistics, 6(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-09342016000300004

Alenzi, A. (2019). A systemic functional linguistics analysis of the discourse of English Friday sermons [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The University of New Mexico.

Alsaawi, A. (2017). Imams’ language in mosque sermons [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Newcastle University.

Ariel, M. (2014). Accessing noun-phrase antecedent. Routledge

Arminen, I. (2005). Institutional interaction: Studies of talk at work. Ashgate Publishing Company.

Bramley, N. (2001). Pronouns of politics: The use of pronouns in the construction of ‘self’ and ‘other’ in political interviews [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The Australian National University.

Brown, G., & Yule, G. (2012). Discourse analysis. Cambridge University Press.

Brown, P., & Levinson. S. (1994). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.

Chovanec, J. (2014). Pragmatics of tense and time in news: From canonical headlines to online news texts. John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Cramer, J. (2010). Do we really want to be like them? Indexing Europeanness through pronominal use. Discourse & Society, 21(6), 619-637. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0957926510381217

Downes, W. (2011). Language and religion. Cambridge University Press.

Duguid, A. (2007). Men at work: How those at number 10 construct their working identity. In G. Garzone & S. Sarangi (Eds.), Discourse, ideology, and specialized communication (pp. 453-484). Peter Lang.

Eragbe, C., & Yakubu, S. (2015). The use of deixis and deictic expressions in Boko Haram insurgency reports: A study of selected Boko Haram insurgency reports by the media. Research Journal of English Language and Literature, 3(3), 94-101.

Ewata, T. O. (2017). Discourse pointing devices in newspaper editorials. European Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 5(9), 35-49.

Fillmore, C. (1997). Lectures on deixis. CSLI Publications.

Garner, M. (2007). Preaching as a communicative event: A discourse analysis of sermons by Robert Rollock (1555-1599). Reformation & Renaissance Review, 9(1), 45-70. https://doi.org/10.1558/rrr.v9i1.45

Green, K. (1992). A study of deixis in relation to lyric poetry [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Sheffield.

Grenoble, L. A. (1998). Deixis and information packaging in Russian discourse. John Benjamins.

Hanks, W. (2011). Deixis and indexicality. In W. Bublitz & N. R. Norrick (Eds.), Foundations of pragmatics (pp. 315-346). De Gruyter Mouton.

Harwood, N. (2005). ‘We do not seem to have a theory… The theory I present here attempts to fill this gap’: Inclusive and exclusive pronouns in academic writing. Applied Linguistics, 26(3), 343-375. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami012

Haverkate, H. (1992). Deictic categories as mitigating devices. Pragmatics, 2(4), 505-522. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.2.4.03hav

Hutagalung, D. (2017). An analysis of deixis in Donald Trump’s speech to the major cities chiefs police associations [Unpublished master’s dissertation]. University of Sumatera Utara.

Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365

Inčiuraitė, L. (2012). The use of deictic elements in Ælfric’s catholic homilies. Verbum, 30, 59-69. https://doi.org/10.15388/Verb.2012.3.4969

Irgens, B. (2017). Person deixis in Japanese and English [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Bergen.

Ivanova, A. (2016). Deixis and its role in defining rhetorical space. Revista Signos: Estudios de Lengua y Literatura, 49(92), 329-349. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-09342016000300004

Kermer, F. (2016). A cognitive grammar approach to teaching tense and aspect in the L2 context. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Khalifa, R. (2018). A deictic analysis of the political discourse of some of Donald Trump’s presidential speeches based on the discourse space theory. Sahifatul-Alsun, 34(January), 40-71.

Kreidler, C. W. (2014). Introducing English semantics. Routledge.

Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.

Levinson, S. (2006). Deixis. In L. Horn & G. Ward (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp. 97-121). Blackwell publishing.

Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge University Press.

Mahmood, I, & Kasim, Z. (2019). Interpersonal metadiscursive features in contemporary Islamic Friday sermon. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 25(1), 85-99. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2019-2501-06

Marmaridou, S. (2000). Pragmatic meaning and cognition. John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Maziad, M. E. D. (2018). Brother citizens: Divided WE stand, united I fall. Deictics and anaphors of the Arab spring speeches of Mubarak. Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 11(2), 36–56.

Mey, J. (2001). Pragmatics: An introduction. Blackwell.

O’Keeffe, A., Clancy, B., & Adolphs, S. (2011). Introducing pragmatics in use. Routledge.

Reyes, A. (2011). Voice in political discourse. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Rühlemann, C., & O’Donnell, M. B. (2015). Deixis. In K. Aijmer & C. Rühlemann (Eds.), Corpus pragmatics (pp. 331-359). Cambridge University Press.

Rumman, R. N. A. (2019). Persuasive strategies in Arabic religious discourse: Evidence from the Friday sermons of Dr. Mohammad Rateb Al-Nabulsi. International Journal of Linguistics, 11(6), 248-270. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v11i6.15799

Sušinskienė, S. (2013). The use of deixis in advertising slogans related to fragrance. Ac¬ta Hu-ma¬ni¬ta¬ri¬ca Uni¬ver¬si¬ta¬tis Sau¬len¬sis, 17, 179-187.

van Leeuwen, T. (1995). The grammar of legitimation. London School of Printing.

van Leeuwen T. (2007). Legitimation in discourse and communication. Discourse & Society, 1(1), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307071986

van Leeuwen. T. (2008). Discourse and practice. Oxford University Press.

Vanda, K. H., & Péter, F. (2011). Gender differences in the use of the discourse markers you know and I mean. Argumentum, 7, 1-18.

Wales, K. (2003). Personal pronouns in present-day English. Cambridge University Press.

Wang, C. (2017). Critical discourse analysis of Chinese advertisement. Springer.

Wei, H., & Ruizhi, M. (2017). A systemic functional study of the Chinese temporal system: Marked Chinese tenses. In J. J. Webster & X. Peng (Eds.), Applying systemic functional linguistics (pp. 119-135). Bloomsbury.

Wieczorek, A. (2013). Clusivity: A new approach to association and dissociation in political discourse. Cambridge Scholars Publishing

Wilson D. A. (1990). Personal project dimensions and perceived life satisfaction: A quantitative synthesis [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Carleton University.

Wu, Y. (2004). Spatial demonstratives in English and Chinese. John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Yadin-Israel, A. (2015). Some uses of deixis in Rabbinic Hebrew. Journal of Semitic Studies, 60(2), 331-340. https://doi.org/10.1093/jss/fgv003

Yang, Y. (2011). A cognitive interpretation of discourse deixis. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(2), 128-135. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.1.2.128-135

Yule, G. (2008). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.

Zupnik, Y. J. (1994). A pragmatic analysis of the use of person deixis in political discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 21(4), 339-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90010-8




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v9i1.21415

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Print ISSN: 2355-2794, Online ISSN: 2461-0275

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


View Journal Stats