Investigating speaking tasks in relation to communicative goals: Possibilities and obstacles

Ira Dwijayani, Sita Musigrungsi


Enhancing students’ communicative competence is crucial in teaching speaking in Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) classrooms. While relating elements focusing on curriculum, materials, and teachers pay attention to developing the students’ communicative competence, obstacles hinder students’ communicative skill development. This mixed-methods study aimed to analyze the communicative level of the speaking tasks presented in the teaching materials and how teachers used these tasks to enhance communicative competence. It also investigated teachers’ perceived difficulties in teaching speaking in the classroom. The participants were three 11th grade teachers and 54 students from three schools in the southern border area of Thailand. Data collected from speaking task analysis and classroom observation were analyzed based on Littlewood’s communicative continuum, and a semi-structured interview was analyzed with an inductive approach. This in-depth information illustrates the communicative level presented in the teaching materials and observed in the classroom, along with obstacles encountered. The findings showed that teacher-made teaching materials mainly focused on forms, while commercial textbooks explored forms and meaning-focused in Littlewood’s communicative continuum. However, how teachers used the tasks did not always correspond to the original design presented through teaching materials. Many perceived difficulties in teaching English speaking were found, these include time limitations, students’ English proficiency level, teachers’ attitude toward the tasks, a lack of school facilities, and exam-oriented teaching and learning. The results of this study are expected to be a consideration for material developers in designing speaking tasks and for English teachers in engaging their students with communicative speaking activities.


classroom observation; communicative competence; mixed-methods; speaking tasks

Full Text:



Ahmed, S. (2017). Authentic ELT materials in the language classroom: An overview. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 4(2), 181-202.

Brown, J. D. (1996). Testing in language programs. Prentice-Hall Regents.

Bygate, M. (1987). Speaking. Oxford University Press.

Chang, M., & Goswami, J. S. (2011). Factors affecting the implementation of communicative language teaching in Taiwanese college English classes. English Language Teaching, 4(2), 3-12.

Chou, M. (2017). Impacts of the Test of English Listening Comprehension (TELC) on teachers and teaching in Taiwan. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 2(5), 1-14.

Cunningsworth, A. (1984). Evaluating and selecting EFL teaching materials. Heinemann Educational.

Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing your coursebook. Macmillan Heinemann.

Deng, C., & Carless, D. (2009). The communicativeness of activities in a task-based innovation in Guangdong, China. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 19, 113-134.

Dincer, A., & Yesilyurt, S. (2013). Pre-service English teachers’ beliefs on speaking skills based on motivational orientations. English Language Teaching, 6(7), 88-95.

Dincer, A., & Yesilyurt, S. (2017). Motivation to speak English: A self-determination theory perspective. PASAA: Journal of Language Teaching and Learning in Thailand, 53, 1-25.

Dubin, F., & Olshtain, E. (1986). Course design. Cambridge University Press.

Ellis, R. (2009). Task-based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 221-246.

Ellis, R. (2013). Task-based language teaching: Responding to the critics. University of Sydney Papers in TESOL, 8, 1-27.

Estaire, S., & Zanon, J. (1994). Planning classwork: A task-based approach. Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

Goh, C. C. M., & Burns, A. (2012). Teaching speaking: A holistic approach. Cambridge University Press.

Grauer, K. (2012). A case for case study research in education. In S. R. Klein (Ed.), Action research methods: Plain and simple. (pp. 69-76). Palgrave Macmillan.

Gray, J. (2013). Critical perspective on language teaching materials. Palgrave Macmillan.

Hancock, D. R., & Algozzine, B. (2006). Doing case study research: A practical guide for beginning researchers. Teachers College Press.

Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching (4th ed.). Pearson Longman.

Hedge, T. (2000). Teaching and learning in the language classroom. Oxford University Press.

Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.

Huang, S., & Yang, L. (2018). Teachers’ needs in the advancement of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in Taiwan. TESOL International Journal, 13(1), 100-117.

Hughes, R. (2011). Teaching and researching speaking (2nd ed.). Pearson Education Limited.

Imsa-ard, P. (2021). Choices of teaching practices: Does the English national examination cause Thai EFL teachers to teach to the test? TESOL International Journal, 16(5), 56-86.

Inprasit, C. (2016). Thai native teachers’ experiences of using communicative language teaching in extended education schools [Master’s thesis, Thammasat University].

Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2008). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (7th ed.). Sage Publications.

Johnson, R. K. (1989). A decision-making framework for the coherent language curriculum. In Johnson, R. K. (Eds.), The second language curriculum (pp. 10-11). Cambridge University Press.

Kalanzadeh, G. A., Mirchenari, N. A., & Bakhtiarvand, M. (2013). Perceived problems in using communicative language teaching (CLT) by EFL Iranian teachers. The International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 2(3), 5-16.

Khan, K., Khan, W., Hayat, Y., Ahmad, S. M., & Raza. K. K. (2020). A comparative study of students’ and teachers’ perceptions about English textbooks at intermediate level and their role in promoting students’ proficiency in English. International Journal of English Linguistics, 10(2). 40-50.

Li, D. (1998). ”It’s always more difficult than you plan and imagine”: Teachers’ perceived difficulties in introducing the communicative approach in South Korea. TESOL Quarterly, 32(4), 677-703.

Lim, Y. (2019). Speaking activities for communicative competence in English textbooks. Primary English Education, 25(4), 191-210.

Littlewood, W. (1981). Communicative language teaching: An introduction. Cambridge University Press.

Littlewood, W. (2004). The task-based approach: Some questions and suggestions. ELT Journal, 58(4), 319-326.

Littlewood, W. (2007). Communicative and task-based language teaching in East Asian classrooms. Language Teaching, 40(3), 243-249.

Littlewood, W. (2013). Developing a context-sensitive pedagogy for communication-oriented language teaching. English Teaching, 68(3), 3-25.

Littlewood, W. (2018). Developing a personal approach to teaching language for communication. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 15(4), 1222-1229.

Luoma, S. (2004). Assessing speaking. Cambridge University Press.

McDonough, J., & Shaw, C. (1993). Materials and methods in ELT. Blackwell Publisher.

Mede, E., & Yalçin, S. (2019). Utilizing textbook adaptation strategies: Experiences and challenges of novice and experienced EFL instructors. TESOL International Journal, 14(1), 91-104.

Michaud, M. (2015). Oral communication in the Japanese senior high school: Communicative competence and comparisons of textbooks used for EFL instruction. Journal of Linguistics and Language Teaching, 6(5), 231-258.

Ministry of Education Thailand. (2008). Basic education core curriculum B.E. 2551 (A.D. 2008).

Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge University Press.

Ogura, F. (2008). Communicative competence and senior high school oral communication textbooks in Japan. The Language Teacher, 32(12), 3-8.

Prabhu, N. S. (1987). Second language pedagogy. Oxford University Press.

Prasongporn, P. (2016). English education at primary level in Thailand

Razmjoo, S. A. (2007). Private Institutes textbooks? Which fulfill communicative language teaching principles in the Iranian context? The Asian EFL Journal, 9(4), 126-140.

Richards, J. C. (2008). Teaching listening and speaking: From theory to practice. Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. (1986). Approaches and methods in language teaching: A description and analysis. Cambridge University Press.

Sasum, S., & Weeks, B. (2018, May 4). Why some Thai students cannot speak English fluently? [Paper presentation]. RSU International Research Conference on Science and Technology, Social Science and Humanities, Rangsit University, Pathum Thani, Thailand.

Savignon, S. J. (1976, April 23). Communicative competence: Theory and classroom practice [Paper presentation]. Central States Conference on the Teaching of Foreign Languages, Detroit, Michigan, United States.

Snow, D., & Campbell, M. (2017). More than a native speaker: An introduction to teaching English abroad. TESOL Press.

Suryani, R. W. (2018). “When English rings the bell”: An English textbook analysis. English Language Teaching and Research, 2(1), 258-268.

Timothy, D. J. (2001). Tourism and political boundaries. Routledge.

Todd, R.W. (2019). How is English assessed at Thai schools? THAITESOL Journal, 32(1), 1-15.

van den Branden, K. (2006). Task-based language education: From theory to practice. Cambridge University Press.

Willis, D., & Willis J. (2007). Doing task-based teaching. Oxford University Press.


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Print ISSN: 2355-2794, Online ISSN: 2461-0275

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

View Journal Stats