Responses to earlier literature in research article introductions: A rhetorical study in applied linguistics

Warsidi Warsidi, Abd Halim, Alfiandy Kamal, Nur Mutmainna Halim, Zifirdaus Adnan, Iskandar Abdul Samad, Andi Muhammad Irawan

Abstract


Given that researchers aim to publish in prestigious journals, understanding the rhetorical organization of such publications is crucial.  While this topic has been extensively studied, existing research has yet to explore how authors in reputable journals engage with prior literature. To fill this gap, the present study intends to analyze how research article authors respond to other earlier literature in their research article introductions (RAIs) published in reputable international applied linguistics journals. This study aims to achieve two objectives: to find out to what extent responding to other earlier literature is important in RAIs, and to discover what types of response authors employ in their RAIs. To achieve these goals, this study employed combined descriptive qualitative and quantitative approaches for analyzing 40 RAIs published in Q1 journals as data sets in the present study. Then, a new analytical framework was designed to respond to the above objectives. The results indicated that responding to other earlier literature is obligatory in RAIs published in reputable international applied linguistics journals. In responding to other earlier literature, authors employed three types of response: either extending other earlier studies, modifying other earlier studies, or establishing a new method, idea, or knowledge. This study offers theoretical contributions by expanding the understanding of how research article authors engage with prior literature within their RAIs.  Its practical implications include guiding researchers on effectively utilizing prior literature to establish their research agenda when publishing in reputable journals.

Keywords


reputable applied linguistics journals; research article introductions (RAIs); responding to other earlier literature; setting the current research agenda

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdi, J., & Sadeghi, K. (2018). Promotion through claiming centrality in L1 and L2 English research article introductions. International Journal of English Studies, 18(1), 53-70. https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2018/1/297381

Adnan, Z. (2011). ‘Ideal-problem-solution’(IPS) model: A discourse model of research article introductions (RAIS) in education. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 34(1), 75-103. https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.34.1.05adn

Afros, E., & Schryer, C. F. (2009). Promotional (meta) discourse in research articles in language and literary studies. English for Specific Purposes, 28(1), 58-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2008.09.001

Alharbi, S. H. (2021). A comparative genre-based analysis of the move-step structure of RAIs in two different publication contexts. English Language Teaching, 14(3), 12-24. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v14n3p12

Amnuai, W. (2021). A comparison of niche establishments in English research article introductions published in international and Thai journals. Discourse and Interaction, 14(2), 24-40. https://doi.org/10.5817/DI2021-2-24

Arianto, M. A., & Basthomi, Y. (2021). The authors’ research gap strategies in ELT research article introductions: Does Scopus journal quartile matter? Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(4), 1743-1759. https://doi.org/10.52462/jlls.127

Arianto, M. A., Saukah, A., Basthomi, Y., & Wulyani, A. N. (2021). Previous studies have several limitations…: Indonesian doctoral students’, Indonesian academics’, and international authors’ research gap strategies in ELT research article abstracts and introductions. Journal of Language and Education, 7(2), 25-44. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2021.11735

Arsyad, S., & Zainil, Y. (2023). Research gap strategies in article introductions of different rank applied linguistics journals. Studies in English Language and Education, 10(1), 216-234. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v10i1.25302

Bazerman, C. (2004). Intertextuality: How texts rely on other texts. In C. Bazerman & P. Prior (Eds.), What writing does and how it does it: An introduction to analyzing texts and textual practices (pp. 83-96). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Bouncken, R. B., Fredrich, V., Ritala, P., & Kraus, S. (2018). Coopetition in new product development alliances: Advantages and tensions for incremental and radical innovation. British Journal of Management, 29(3), 391-410. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12213

Caputo, R. K. (2018). Peer review: A vital gatekeeping function and obligation of professional scholarly practice. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 100, 6-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044389418808155

Chanaron, J.-J. (2020). Challenges to radical innovation winning technology for the car of the future? Part two. Megatrend revija, 17(3), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.5937/MegRev2003001C

Cillo, V., Petruzzelli, A. M., Ardito, L., & Del Giudice, M. (2019). Understanding sustainable innovation: A systematic literature review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(5), 1012-1025. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1783

de Vasconcelos Gomes, V., L. A., Facin, A. L. F., Salerno, M. S., & Ikenami, R. K. (2018). Unpacking the innovation ecosystem construct: Evolution, gaps and trends. Technological forecasting and social change, 136, 30-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.009

Ghanbar, H., & Rezvani, R. (2023). Research questions in applied linguistics research: A microscopic analysis of their distributional and syntactical aspects. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 156-167. https://doi.org/10.22055/RALS.2023.18074

Gilliland, S. W., & Cortina, J. M. (1997). Reviewer and editor decision making in the journal review process. Personnel Psychology, 50, 427-452. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1744-6570.1997.Tb00914.X

Hilmi, A. Z., & Afifi, N. (2021). A genre analysis on the discussion section of quantitative and qualitative research articles in ELT and linguistics. JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies), 8(2), 341-369. https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v8i2.3264

Hyland, K. (2004). Genre and second language writing. University of Michigan Press.

Hyland, K., & Zou, H. J. (2022). Titles in research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 56, 101094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2022.101094

Inigo, E. A., Albareda, L., & Ritala, P. (2017). Business model innovation for sustainability: Exploring evolutionary and radical approaches through dynamic capabilities. Industry and Innovation, 24(5), 515-542. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2017.1310034

Jiang, F. K., & Hyland, K. (2023). Titles in research articles: Changes across time and discipline. Learned Publishing, 36(2), 239-248. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1498

Kerans, M. E., Marshall, J., Murray, A., & Sabate, S. (2020). Research article title content and form in high-ranked international clinical medicine journals. English for Specific Purposes, 60, 127-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2020.06.001

Lim, J. M.-H. (2012). How do writers establish research niches? A genre-based investigation into management researchers’ rhetorical steps and linguistic mechanisms. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(3), 229-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2012.05.002

Lim, J. M.-H. (2014). Expert writers’ descriptions and justifications of research instruments and materials: Using communicative resources to generate promotional effects. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice, 11(2), 154-176. https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.34704

Loi, C. K., Lim, J. M. H., & Wharton, S. (2016). Expressing an evaluative stance in English and Malay research article conclusions: International publications versus local publications. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 21, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.08.004

Lu, X., Casal, J. E., & Liu, Y. (2020). The rhetorical functions of syntactically complex sentences in social science research article introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 44, 100832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100832

Lu, X., Yoon, J., Kisselev, O., Casal, J. E., Liu, Y., Deng, J., & Nie, R. (2021). Rhetorical and phraseological features of research article introductions: Variation among five social science disciplines. System, 100, 102543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102543

Saeedi, M., Khany, R., & Tazik, K. (2023). Research themes and sub-themes in academic wordlist studies between 2000 and 2020: A systematic review. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 95-111. https://doi.org/10.22055/RALS.2023.18070

Shokri, A., Khany, R., & Aliakbari, M. (2022). Two decades of research articles keywords in corpus-based studies in International Journal of Corpus Linguistics. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 70-83. https://doi.org/10.22055/RALS.2022.17426

Suryani, I., Yaacob, A., & Abd Aziz, N. H. (2015a). Introduction sections of research articles with high and low citation indices. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 23(4), 1139-1152.

Suryani, I., Yaacob, A., & Abd Aziz, N. H. (2015b). “Indicating a research gap” in computer science research article introductions by non-native English writers. Asian Social Science, 11(28), 293-302. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n28p293

Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.

Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524827

Wang, W., & Yang, C. (2015). Claiming centrality as promotion in applied linguistics research article introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20, 162-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.05.002

Warsidi. (2021). Rhetorical patterns of Indonesian research articles in law and history disciplines: A genre-based analysis [Doctoral dissertation, University of New England]. Research UNE. https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/56684

Warsidi. (2022). Genre analysis of English vs. Indonesian application letters. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 7(2), 419-435. https://dx.doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v7i2.857

Warsidi. (2023). Promoting research through claiming centrality and explicit research contributions in applied linguistics research articles. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature), 8(2), 264-280. https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v8i2.26491

Warsidi. (2024). The rhetorical model of Indonesian research article introductions (RAIs) in the law discipline: Problems and opportunities. Journal of Language and Literature, 24(2), 315-327. https://doi.org/10.24071/joll.v24i2.6455

Warsidi, & Adnan, Z. (2024). The rhetorical strategies to create incremental innovation in applied linguistics research articles. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature), 9(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v9i1.29780

Warsidi, Adnan, Z., & Maniam, V. (2024). A contrastive genre-based study of English and Indonesian RAIs in the history discipline. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 17(1), 467-488. Retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/article/view/270422

Warsidi, Irawan, A. M., Adnan, Z., & Samad, I. A. (2023). Citation studies in English vs. Indonesian research article introductions (RAIs) in the history discipline. Studies in English Language and Education, 10(2), 598-613. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v10i2.28343

Warsidi, & Maniam, V. (2024). Academic conflicts in research articles discussion: The case of Indonesian and Malaysian authors. Issues in Language Studies, 13(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.33736/ils.5865.2024

Xiaofei, L., Jungwan, Y., & Olesya, K. (2021). Matching phrase-frames to rhetorical moves in social science research article introductions. English for Specific Purposes, 61, 63-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2020.10.001

Xu, X., & Nesi, H. (2019a). Differences in engagement: A comparison of the strategies used by British and Chinese research article writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 38, 121-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.02.003

Xu, X., & Nesi, H. (2019b). Evaluation in research article introductions: A comparison of the strategies used by Chinese and British authors. Text & Talk, 39(6), 797-818. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2019-2046

Ye, Y. (2019). Macrostructures and rhetorical moves in energy engineering research articles written by Chinese expert writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 38, 48-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.01.007

Zainuddin, S. Z., & Shaari, A. H. (2021). A genre-inspired investigation of establishing the territory in thesis introductions by Malaysian ESL writers. 3L: Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2021-2702-11




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v12i1.35160

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Print ISSN: 2355-2794, Online ISSN: 2461-0275

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


View Journal Stats