Analyzing semantic shifts in English and German by exploring historical influences and societal dynamics

Wahyu Kurniati Asri, Winda Ayu Utami Rhamadanty, Muftihaturrahmah Burhamzah, Alamsyah Alamsyah

Abstract


This research examines the mechanisms of semantic change in English and German, focusing on comparing and contrasting these processes across the two languages and investigating the influence of major historical events and societal shifts. By utilizing digital text corpora, libraries, archives, and modern digital media, the study conducts qualitative analyses, including case studies and discourse analysis, to explore semantic evolution. Thematic analysis was employed to thoroughly examine and interpret the data, allowing for the identification of recurring patterns, themes, and significant insights. The results showed that both English and German undergo significant semantic shifts driven by a metaphorical extension (i.e., narrowing or broadening of meanings, pejoration and amelioration, frequency and pathway of change, cultural and historical influences) and historical events and societal shifts that influence semantic change (i.e., wars and conflicts, industrialization, technological advancement, globalization, and cultural exchange, societal movements, and ideological shifts). The role of metaphorical extension is seen in adapting language to technological advancements while highlighting linguistic evolution through narrowing and broadening meanings influenced by cultural, historical, and linguistic factors. Additionally, pejoration and amelioration reflect societal changes and attitudes. Historical events and societal shifts, such as wars, industrialization, technological advancements, globalization, and social movements, significantly impact semantic changes in both English and German. These external influences catalyze language use and meaning shifts, illustrating the interaction between language and human experience.

Keywords


globalization; semantic change; social movements; technological advancements

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aitchison, J. (2001). Language change. In P. Cobley (Ed.), The Routledge companion to semiotics and linguistics. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203996089-17

Akidah, M. A. (2013). Phonological and semantic change in language borrowing: The case of Arabic words borrowed into Kiswahili. International Journal of Education and Research, 1(4), 1-20.

Anderson, S. (2014). Morphological change. In C. Bowern & B. Evans (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of historical linguistics. Routledge.

Androutsopoulos, J. (2011). Language change and digital media: A review of conceptions and evidence. In K. Tore & N. Coupland (Eds.), Standard languages and language standards in a changing Europe (pp. 145-159). Novus Press.

Appel, R., & Muysken, P. (2005). Language contact and bilingualism. Amsterdam University Press.

Baker, C. (2016). The effects of the Norman conquest on the English language. Tenor of Our Times, 5, Article 5.

Baker, P. (2023). Using corpora in discourse analysis. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Baldi, P. (2008). English as an Indo‐European language. In H. Momma & M. Matto (Eds.), A companion to the history of the English language (pp. 127-141). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444302851.ch12

Berg, T. (2017). Compounding in German and English: A quantitative translation study. Languages in Contrast, 17(1), 43-68. https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.17.1.03ber

Bomhard, A. R. (2018). A comprehensive introduction to Nostratic comparative linguistics. With special reference to Indo-European (Vol. 1, 3rd ed.). Florence.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Brown, L. B. (2015). What’s in a name? Examining the creation and use of sexual orientation and gender identity labels. Issues in Religion and Psychotherapy, 37(1), 23-32. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/irp/vol37/iss1/8

Campbell, L. (2001). The history of linguistics. In M. Aronoff & J. Ress-Miller (Eds.), The handbook of linguistics (pp. 81-104). https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756409.ch4

Carlson, L., & Van der Zee, E. (Eds.). (2004). Functional features in language and space: Insights from perception, categorization, and development. Oxford University Press.

Chambers, W. W., & Wilkie, J. R. (2014). A short history of the German language (RLE linguistics E: Indo-European linguistics). Routledge.

Chen, K. (2024). Analysis of semantic change from a lexical perspective. Journal of Education and Educational Research, 7(3), 342-344. https://doi.org/10.54097/myqkwn38

Collinge, N. E. (1995). History of historical linguistics. In E. F. K. Koerner & R. E. Asher (Eds.), Concise history of the language sciences (pp. 203-212). Pergamon. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-042580-1.50038-6

Coulson, S. (2001). Semantic leaps: Frame-shifting and conceptual blending in meaning construction. Cambridge University Press.

Da Costa, A. L. G. (2016). Semantic change in William Shakespeare: A case study from Sonnet 130 [Bachelor’s thesis, University of León]. Buleria Unileon. http://hdl.handle.net/10612/7929

Davies, M. (2012). Some methodological issues related to corpus-based investigations of recent syntactic changes in English. In T. Nevalainen & E. C. Traugott (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the history of English (pp. 157-174). Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199922765.013.0016

Deignan, A. (2016). From linguistic to conceptual metaphors. In E. Semino & Z. Demjén (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language (Chap. 7). Routledge.

de Sá, J. M. C., Da Silveira, M., & Pruski, C. (2024). Survey in characterization of semantic change. Cornell University. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.19088

Donnelly, M., Baratta, A., & Gamsu, S. (2019). A sociolinguistic perspective on accent and social mobility in the UK teaching profession. Sociological Research Online, 24(4), 496-513. https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780418816335

Evans, V., & Green, M. (2018). Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Routledge.

Fillmore, C. (2006). 10. Frame semantics. In D. Geeraerts (Ed.), Cognitive linguistics: Basic readings (pp. 373-400). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199901.373

Flowerdew, L. (2014). Corpus-based analyses in EAP. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic discourse (Chap. 5). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315838069-14

Fortson IV, B. W. (2003). An approach to semantic change. In B. D. Joseph & R. D. Janda (Eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics (pp. 648-666). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756393.ch21

Gelman, S. A., Ware, E. A., & Kleinberg, F. (2010). Effects of generic language on category content and structure. Cognitive Psychology, 61(3), 273-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.06.001

Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2012). Applied thematic analysis. Sage Publications.

Hao, Y., & Chi, R. (2013). Analysis of English semantic change. Higher Education of Social Science, 5(2), 61-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/j.hess.1927024020130502.H534

Hidalgo-Downing, L. (2015). Metaphor and metonymy. In R. H. Jones (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and creativity (Chap. 6). Routledge.

Hilpert, M. (2019). 5. Historical linguistics. In E. Dąbrowska & D. Divjak (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics - A survey of linguistic subfields (pp. 108-132). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110626452-005

Horchak, O. (2013). An embodied approach to language: The role of bodily feedback in discourse processing [Doctoral dissertation, Universidade do Algarve]. UAlg Scientific Repository. https://sapientia.ualg.pt/entities/publication/b1b859df-6f60-415a-b1aa-8c7fc364b70f

Horchak, O. V., Giger, J. C., Cabral, M., & Pochwatko, G. (2014). From demonstration to theory in embodied language comprehension: A review. Cognitive Systems Research, 29-30, 66-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2013.09.002

Kay, C., Horobin, S., & Smith, J. J. (Eds.). (2004). New perspectives on English historical linguistics, Volume I: Syntax and morphology. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.251

Koch, P. (2016). 2. Meaning change and semantic shifts. In P. Juvonen & M. Koptjevskaja-Tamm (Eds.), The lexical typology of semantic shifts (pp. 21-66). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110377675-002

Kovacs, E. (2011). Polysemy in traditional vs. cognitive linguistics. Eger Journal of English Studies, 11, 3-19.

Lehmann, W. P. (2013). Historical linguistics: An introduction. Routledge.

Lehtinen, J. (2009). Language change as an evolutionary process [Master’s thesis, University of Helsinki]. University of Helsinki Open Repository. http://hdl.handle.net/10138/19339

Mair, C. (2019). English in the German-speaking world: An inevitable presence. In R. Hickey (Ed.), English in the German-speaking world (pp. 13-30). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108768924.002

Maynard, D. W., & Peräkylä, A. (2003). Language and social interaction. In J. Delamater (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 233-257). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-36921-X_10

Millar, R., & Trask, R. L. (2015). Trask’s historical linguistics (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315728056

Moreno, Á., Navarro, C., Tench, R., & Zerfass, A. (2015). Does social media usage matter? An analysis of online practices and digital media perceptions of communication practitioners in Europe. Public Relations Review, 41(2), 242-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.12.006

Morrison, S. (2012). Lexical innovation in English at the end of the Middle Ages. In Actes de colloque (pp. 17-30). HAL Open Science. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00818338

Němcová, M. (2019). Interference of German on English: The case of Austrian learners [Master’s thesis, Masaryk University]. Informačni Systém Masarykovy Univerzity. https://is.muni.cz/th/zw91e/

Nerlich, B. (2010). 7. Metaphor and metonymy. In A. Jucker & I. Taavitsainen (Eds.), Historical pragmatics (pp. 193-218). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214284.3.193

Ogrodniczuk, M., & Gruszczyński, W. (2019). Connecting data for digital libraries: the library, the dictionary and the corpus. In A. Jatowt, A. Maeda, & S. Syn (Eds.), Digital Libraries at the Crossroads of Digital Information for the Future. ICADL 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 11853, pp. 125-138). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34058-2_13

Perrone, V., Hengchen, S., Palma, M., Vatri, A., Smith, J. Q., & McGillivray, B. (2021). Lexical semantic change for Ancient Greek and Latin. In N. Tahmasebi, L. Borin, A. Jatowt, Y. Xu, & S. Hengchen (Eds.), Computational approaches to semantic change (Vol. 6). Language Science Press. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2101.09069

Quiles, C., & Lopez-Menchero, F. (2009). A grammar of modern Indo-European: Language and culture, writing system and phonology, morphology, syntax, texts and dictionary, etymology (2nd ed.). Indo-European Association.

Stockinger, P. (2015). The semiotic turn in digital archives and libraries. Les Cahiers Du Numériqu, 11, 57-82.

Tahmasebi, N., Borin, L., Jatowt, A., Xu, Y., & Hengchen, S. (Eds.). (2021). Computational approaches to semantic change. Language Science Press. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5040241

Traugott, E. C. (2006). Semantic change: Bleaching, strengthening, narrowing, extension. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language & linguistics (2nd ed., pp. 124-131). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/01105-6

Wells, R. S. (1977). Metonymy and misunderstanding: An aspect of language change. In R. W. Cole (Ed.), Current issues in linguistic theory (Chap. 6). Indiana University Press.

Winter, B., & Srinivasan, M. (2022). Why is semantic change asymmetric? the role of concreteness and word frequency and metaphor and metonymy. Metaphor and Symbol, 37(1), 39-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2021.1945419

Wood, S. (2001). Sprachpolitik: Some socio-political effects of English in Germany. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 14(3), 621-642.

Zlatev, J. (2009). Levels of meaning, embodiment, and communication. Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 16(3-4), 149.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v11i2.37460

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks



Print ISSN: 2355-2794, Online ISSN: 2461-0275

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


View Journal Stats