Exploring English for Academic Purposes Program: Needs analysis and impact evaluation

Ika Lestari Damayanti, Pelin Derinalp, Firly Asyifa, Kurniawan Suryatama

Abstract


A collaborative project involving two universities was initiated to support lecturers in Indonesia in designing English for Academic Purposes (EAP) instruction adjusted to local needs and the latest advancements in EAP. Using a mixed-methods approach and developmental research design, the study included a needs analysis, implementation of an EAP professional learning program, and a program evaluation survey. Needs analysis was conducted through a survey with 88 lecturers and 618 students from 41 universities in Indonesia. The results of the need analysis were then used to inform the design and delivery of an online professional development program for EAP lecturers. Based on the needs analysis results, the EAP lecturers who participated in the survey conveyed that they required improvements in digital skills, teaching techniques for diverse proficiency levels, and methods for improving students’ productive skills and critical thinking abilities. The participating students also expressed their need for interactive EAP activities, team-based learning, and the use of social media for collaboration and connectivity. Informed by the needs analysis results, a two-month program was designed and delivered in eight 90-minute video conferences, combined with asynchronous activities on a learning platform. As revealed in the post-program survey, the participating lecturers’ feedback on the program highlighted contributing factors to the changes in their technological and pedagogical content knowledge, particularly in the areas of using digital tools and differentiated instruction in EAP. This study highlights the need for continuous professional development to enhance EAP lecturers’ ability to effectively apply acquired skills in teaching and professional practice.

Keywords


English for Academic Purposes; productive skills; technological and pedagogical content knowledge

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aktaş, İ., & Özmen, H. (2022). Assessing the performance of Turkish science pre-service teachers in a TPACK-practical course. Education and Information Technology, 27, 3495-3528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10757-z

Atai, M. R., & Reza, D. (2013). Iranian English for Academic Purposes (EAP) stakeholders’ attitudes toward using the Internet in EAP courses for Civil Engineering Students: Promises and challenges. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(1), 21-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2011.627872

Bell, D. (2022). Methodology in EAP: Why is it largely still an overlooked issue? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 55(1), 101073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.101073

Canagarajah, S. (2014). EAP in Asia: Challenges and possibilities. In I. Liyanage & T. Walker (Eds.), English for Academic Purposes (EAP) in Asia: Negotiating appropriate practices in a global context (pp. 93-102). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-752-0_7

Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12, 297 - 298. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613

Damayanti, I. L., Hamied, F. A., Kartika-Ningsih, H., & Dharma, N. S. (2023). Building knowledge about language for teaching IELTS writing tasks: A genre-based approach. Studies in English Language and Education, 10(2), 756-776. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v10i2.26957

Dardjito, H., Rolls, N., Setiawan, A., & Sumekto, D. R. (2023). Challenges in reading English academic texts for non-English major students of an Indonesian university. Studies in English Language and Education, 10(3), 1290-1309. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v10i3.29067

Dhillon, S., & Murray, N. (2021). An investigation of EAP teachers’ views and experiences of e-learning technology. Education Sciences, 11(2), 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11020054

Drajati, N. A., Rakerda, H., Sulistyawati, H., Nurkamto, J., & Ilmi, M. (2021). Investigating the adoption of TPACK-21CL by English pre-service teachers in a COVID-19 teaching practicum. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(1), 124-133. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v11i1.34625

Farrell, T. S. (2022). Reflective practice in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.

Hadley, G. (2015). English for academic purposes in neoliberal universities: A critical grounded theory. Springer.

Hyland, K. (2006). English for Academic Purposes (Routledge Applied Linguistics) (1st ed.). Routledge.

Hyland, K., & Hamp-Lyons, L. (2002). EAP: issues and directions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 1(1). 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-1585(02)00002-4

Ivankova, N. V., Creswell, J. W., & Stick, S. L. (2006). Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field Methods, 18(1), 3-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05282260

Kafle, M. (2014). EAP in Nepal. In I. Liyanage & T. Walker (Eds.), English for Academic Purposes (EAP) in Asia: Negotiating appropriate practices in a global context (pp. 51-64). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-752-0_4

Khampool, W., & Chumworatayee, T. (2023). Collaborative Strategic Reading (CSR) instruction and its effects on Thai EAP university learners’ reading comprehension across two proficiency levels. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 16(2), 8-24. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/article/view/266930

Kim, S. (2006). Academic oral communication needs of East Asian international graduate students in non-science and non-engineering fields. English for Specific Purposes, 25(4), 479-489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.10.001

Kirkpatrick, D., & Kirkpatrick, J. (2006). Evaluating training programs: The four levels. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology. Computers & Education, 49(3), 740-762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.012

Kohnke, L., Foung, D., & Chen, J. (2023). Cluster analysis of Hong Kong students’ self-regulated learning in contextualized multimodal language learning. Educational Technology & Society, 26(3), 53-68. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48734321

Lawrence, G., Ahmed, F., Cole, C., & Johnston, K. P. (2020). Not more technology but more effective technology: Examining the state of technology integration in EAP programmes. RELC Journal, 51(1), 101-116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220907199

Li, Y., & Wang, L. (2020). Chinese teachers’ perception of how TESOL differs from teaching EAP. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(2), 562-570. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v10i2.28609

Liyanage, I., & Walker, T. (Eds.). (2014). English for Academic Purposes (EAP) in Asia: Negotiating appropriate practices in a global context. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-752-0

Mahfoodh, O. H. A. (2022). Factors influencing EFL students’ utilisation of teacher written feedback. TEFLIN Journal, 33(1), 98-122. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v33i1/98-122

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Nurdiani, N. (2014). Teknik sampling snowball dalam penelitian lapangan [Snowball sampling technique in field research]. ComTech, 5, 1110-1118.

Nurkamto, J., & Sarosa, T. (2020). Engaging EFL teachers in reflective practice as a way to pursue sustained professional development. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 4(1), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijpte.v4i1.26082

Santoso, W., Hamied, F. A., & Muslim, A. B. (2024). University students’ attitudes towards English Medium Instruction and academic language support: A view from Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 79-92. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v14i1.70385

Sari, R. Y., Drajati, N. A., So, H., & Sumardi, S. (2021). Enhancing EFL teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) competence through reflective practice. TEFLIN Journal, 32(1). 117-133. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v32i1/117-133

Sinaga, M., Kuswandi, D., & Fadhli, M. (2024). The role of mobile learning in improving 21st century teacher competencies: A systematic literature review. Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan, 11(2), 219-231.

Soliman, N. A. (2016). Teaching English for Academic Purposes via the flipped learning approach. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232, 122-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.036

Terauchi, H., Noguchi, J., & Tajino, A. (Eds.). (2019). Towards a new paradigm for English language teaching: English for specific purposes in Asia and beyond (1st ed.). Routledge.

Tureni. D., Agni. R., Fardha. R., & Ashari, A. (2023). Analysis of TPACK competency-based learning media utilized by senior high school Biology teachers in East Palu. Jurnal Nalar Pendidikan, 11(2), 131-138.

Yundayani, A., Kardijan, D., & Herawan, T. (2019). Integrating ICT in English for Academic Purposes materials through task-based approach. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14, 29-43. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i17.10753




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v11i3.38329

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 69 times
PDF - 53 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Print ISSN: 2355-2794, Online ISSN: 2461-0275

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


View Journal Stats