Exploring postgraduates attitudes towards Grammarly as an automated writing evaluation tool in academic writing

Arwa Mohammed Alghamdi, Atef Odeh AbuSaaleek

Abstract


Automated writing evaluation (AWE) tools are viral among English as a foreign language (EFL) students in academic writing. Thus, the current study explored EFL postgraduates attitudes toward using Grammarly as an AWE tool in academic writing. Furthermore, the study investigated whether there were significant differences in postgraduates attitudes toward using Grammarly in academic writing based on gender. The study participants were 23 postgraduate students at the English Department of a public university in Saudi Arabia. The study employed a mixed-methods approach to collect data on research design, utilizing both a questionnaire and interview questions. The quantitative data was analyzed using SPSS software, while the qualitative data was analyzed thematically. The findings of the quantitative analysis revealed that the postgraduates had a positive attitude toward using Grammarly in academic writing. The independent t-test resulted in no significant differences among the postgraduates attitudes based on gender. Moreover, based on quantitative and qualitative data analysis, Grammarly provides constructive feedback on students writing as it positively impacts academic writing regarding clarity, accuracy, style, and mechanics. Nonetheless, the results reveal some limitations of using Grammarly, such as incorrect suggestions and an overdependence on AWE tools, which can diminish the writers expression.

Keywords


Academic writing, attitudes, automated writing evaluation, EFL, Grammarly, postgraduate.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmadi, D., Maftoon, P., & Mehrdad, A. G. (2012). Investigating the effects of two types of feedback on EFL students’ writing. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 2590-2595.

Aidil, T. M. (2021). Exploring Students’ Perception On The Effectiveness Of “Grammarly Software” In Academic Writing (Doctoral dissertation, UIN Ar- Raniry).

Alexander, V. D., Thomas, H., Cronin, A., Fielding, J., & Moran-Ellis, J. (2008). Mixed methods. Researching social life, 3, 125-144.

Al-Gahtani, S. S. (2016). Empirical investigation of e-learning acceptance and assimilation: A structural equation model. Applied Computing and Informatics, 12(1), 27-50.

Al Qunayeer, H. S. (2020). Supporting postgraduates in research proposals through peer feedback in a Malaysian university. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(7), 956-970.

Alharbi, W. (2023). AI in the Foreign Language Classroom: A Pedagogical Overview of Automated Writing Assistance Tools. Education Research International. 1- 16 https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/4253331

Ananda, M., Nisa, R., & Safura, S. (2021). Students’ perceptions toward the use of Grammarly in checking grammar in assignments. ACCENTIA: Journal of English Language and Education, 1(2), 72-77.

Arisandi, V., & Sudarajat, A. (2023). Revisiting "Grammarly" in higher education (a literature review). Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge, 2(8), 3351- 3356.

Ashrafganjoe, M., Rezai, M. J., & Elhambakhsh, S. E. (2022). Providing computer- based feedback through Grammarly® in writing classes. Journal of Language and Translation, 12(2), 163-176.

Breckler, S. J. (1984). Empirical validation of affect, behavior, and cognition as distinct components of attitude. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(6), 1191–1205. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.47.6.1191

Budianto, S., Sulistyo, T., Widiastuti, O., Heriyawati, D. F., & Marhaban, S. (2020). Written corrective feedback across different levels of EFL students’ academic writing proficiency: Outcomes and implications. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(2), 472-485. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i2.16569

Burton, F., Chen, Y., Grover, V., & Stewart, K. (1992). An Application of Expectancy Theory for Assessing User Motivation to Utilize an Expert System. J. Manag. Inf. Syst., 9, 183-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1992.11517973

Cavaleri, M., & Dianati, S. (2016). You want me to check your grammar again?: The usefulness of an online grammar checker as perceived by students. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 10(1), A223-A236.

Daniels, P., & Leslie, D. (2013). Grammar software ready for EFL writers. OnCue Journal, 9(4), 391-401.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Technology acceptance model: TAM. Information Seeking Behavior and Technology Adoption, 205, 219.

Dewi, U. (2022). Grammarly as automated writing evaluation: Its effectiveness from EFL students’ perceptions. Lingua Cultura, 16(2), 155-161.

Dizon, G., & Gayed, J. M. (2021). Examining the Impact of Grammarly on the Quality of Mobile L2 Writing. JALT CALL Journal, 17(2), 74-92.

Fahmi, M. A., & Cahyono, B. Y. (2021). EFL students’ perception on the use of Grammarly and teacher feedback. JEES (Journal of English Educators Society), 6(1), 18-25.

Fitria, R. A., Sabarun, S., & Miftah, M. Z. (2022). Students’ perception of the use of Grammarly in undergraduate thesis writing. PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education), 5(2), 366-371.

Fitriana, K., & Nurazni, L. (2022). Exploring English Department Students' Perceptions on Using Grammarly to Check the Grammar in Their Writing. Journal of English Teaching, 8(1), 15-25.

Ghufron, M. A., & Rosyida, F. (2018). The role of Grammarly in assessing English as a Foreign Language (EFL) writing. Lingua Cultura, 12(4), 395-403.

Grimes, D., & Warschauer, M. (2010). Utility in a fallible tool: A multi-site case study of automated writing evaluation. The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 8(6).

Guo, Q., Feng, R., & Hua, Y. (2022). How effectively can EFL students use automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) in research writing?. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(9), 2312-2331.

Hakiki, G. N. R. (2021). Perception of EFL students on the use Grammarly application in writing class. Eduvelop: Journal of English Education and Development, 4(2), 99-106.

Huang, H., Li, Z., & Taylor, L. (2020). The Effectiveness of Using Grammarly to Improve Students' Writing Skills. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Distance Education and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1145/3402569.3402594

Karyuatry, L. (2018). Grammarly as a tool to improve students’ writing quality: Free online proofreader across the boundaries. JSSH Jurnal Sains Sosial dan Humaniora, 2(1), 83 89.

Lee, Y. H., Hsiao, C., & Purnomo, S. H. (2014). An empirical examination of individual and system characteristics on enhancing e-learning acceptance. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(5).

Link, S., Mehrzad, M., & Rahimi, M. (2022). Impact of automated writing evaluation on teacher feedback, student revision, and writing improvement. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(4), 605-634.

Masrom, M. (2007). Technology acceptance model and e-learning. Technology, 21(24), 81.

Miranty, D., Widiati, U., Cahyono, B. Y., & Sharif, T. I. S. T. (2021, December). The effectiveness of using Grammarly in teaching writing among Indonesian undergraduate EFL students. In International seminar on language, education, and culture (ISoLEC 2021) (pp. 41-45). Atlantis Press.

Ngo, T. T. N., Chen, H. H. J., & Lai, K. K. W. (2022). The effectiveness of automated writing evaluation in EFL/ESL writing: a three-level meta-analysis. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-18.

Park, J. (2019). ’Implications of AI-based grammar checker in EFL learning and testing: Korean high school students’ writing. The Korea English Language Testing Association, 14(1), 11-39.

Parra G, L., & Calero S, X. (2019). Automated writing evaluation tools in the improvement of writing skill. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 210- 211.https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12214a

Pratama, Y. D. (2021). The investigation of using Grammarly as an online grammar checker in the writing process. English Ideas: Journal of English Language Education, 1(2).

Raskova, L. (2023). Integrating Grammarly Tools to Enhance Writing Efficiency in Senior High School. Jadila: Journal of Development and Innovation in Language and Literature Education, 3(1), 92-106.

Roca, J., Chiu, C., & Martínez, F. (2006). Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud., 64, 683-696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.01.003.

Salehi, K., & Golafshani, N. (2010). Commentary: Using mixed methods in research studies: An opportunity with challenges. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 4(3), 186–191. https://doi.org/10.5172/mra.2010.4.3.186

Sermsook, K., Liamnimitr, J., & Pochakorn, R. (2017). The Impact of Teacher Corrective Feedback on EFL Student Writers' Grammatical Improvement. English Language Teaching, 10(10), 43-49.

Shabani, K., Khatib, M., & Ebadi, S. (2010). Vygotsky's zone of proximal development: Instructional implications and teachers' professional development. English language teaching, 3(4), 237-248.

Šumak, B., Heričko, M., & Pušnik, M. (2011). A meta-analysis of e-learning technology acceptance: The role of user and e-learning technology types. Computers in human behavior, 27(6), 2067-2077.

Suzuki, W., Nassaji, H., & Sato, K. (2019). The effects of feedback explicitness and type of target structure on accuracy in revision and new pieces of writing. System, 81, 135-145

Tambunan, A. R. S., Andayani, W., Sari, W. S., & Lubis, F. K. (2022). Investigating EFL students’ linguistic problems using Grammarly as automated writing evaluation feedback. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 16-27.

Thoha, N., & Rasidi, D. A. (2020). Vroom’s motivation theory: Gen Y's perception. PalArch's Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 17(7), 2900-2911.

Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and Motivation. New York: Wiley.

Vygotsky, L. 1978. Mind in Society. The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Ware, P. (2018). Automated writing assessment. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, 1-7.

Wu, B., & Zhang, C. (2014). Empirical study on continuance intentions towards E- Learning 2.0 systems. Behaviour & Information Technology, 33(10), 1027– 1038. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2014.934291

Yousofi, R. (2022). Grammarly deployment (in) efficacy within EFL academic writing classrooms: An attitudinal report from Afghanistan. Cogent Education, 9(1), 2142446.

Zhai, N., & Ma, X. (2021). Automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback: A systematic investigation of college students’ acceptance. Computer Assisted Language Learning, Advanced publication, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1897019




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v12i2.39995

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Print ISSN: 2355-2794, Online ISSN: 2461-0275

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


View Journal Stats