Thai EFL university students views on the effectiveness of Duolingo for enhancing listening and speaking skills

Yueh Yea Lo, Shanina Sharatol Ahmad Shah, Zuwati Hasim, Fatiha Senom, Mohd Rashid Mohd Saad, Pateera Thienpermpool

Abstract


The current study aims to assess 150 Thai English as a Foreign Language (EFL) first-year university students perspectives on the efficacies of Duolingo, a popular mobile language application in improving English listening and speaking skills. Given the growing importance of mobile-assisted language learning (MALL) in enhancing language proficiency, this study investigates Duolingos potential to address the common challenges faced by EFL learners in developing these essential skills. The data were collected using a quantitative method, namely a structured questionnaire, to record participants attitudes towards Duolingo and corresponding experiences. Simultaneously, Gibson and Browns (2009) thematic technique was employed to analyse the open-ended responses. The results show that a high Duolingo usage level was discovered at 32.0% daily usage and 42.0% several times weekly, which underscored Duolingo integration into linguistic learning journeys. The participants also pinpointed crucial benefits, such as affordability, structured learning, convenience, diverse content, interactivity, audio exercises, and adaptive technologies. Nevertheless, 26.0% of the students described several limitations, including audio quality discrepancies, insufficient real-life conversational practices, and limited topic coverage. Furthermore, a significant gender distribution was demonstrated, with 70.7% females and 29.3% males. The findings posit that female students tended to or possessed higher accessibility to language learning technologies, including Duolingo. The findings reflect broader societal factors impacting educational preferences and opportunities. The study outcomes also contributed to educators and developers to improve digital tools for diverse language learning requirements.

Keywords


Duolingo; language learning; listening skills; speaking skills

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agustina, N., Mayuni, I., Iskandar, I., & Ratminingsih, N. M. (2022). Mobile learning application: Infusing critical thinking in the EFL classroom. Studies in English Language and Education, 9(2), 724-743. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v9i2.23476

Alam, A., & Mohanty, A. (2024). Integrated constructive robotics in education (ICRE) model: A paradigmatic framework for transformative learning in educational ecosystem. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2324487. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2324487

Al-Shehab, M. A. S. (2020). The role of Mobile-assisted Language Learning (MALL) in enhancing the writing skills of Intermediate IEP students: Expectations vs reality. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 20, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2020.20.01

Baig, M. I., Shuib, L., & Yadegaridehkordi, E. (2022). E-learning adoption in higher education: A review. Information Development, 38(4), 570-588. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669211008224

Bernacki, M. L., Greene, J. A., & Crompton, H. (2020). Mobile technology, learning, and achievement: Advances in understanding and measuring the role of mobile technology in education. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 101827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101827

Bonfield, C. A., Salter, M., Longmuir, A., Benson, M., & Adachi, C. (2020). Transformation or evolution? Education 4.0, teaching and learning in the digital age. Higher Education Pedagogies, 5(1), 223-246. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2020.1816847

Bozkurt, A. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence (AI) powered conversational educational agents: The inevitable paradigm shift. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 18(1). https://www.asianjde.com/ojs/index.php/AsianJDE/article/view/718

Burston, J. (2014). Twenty years of MALL project implementation: A meta-analysis of learning outcomes. ReCALL, 27(1), 4-20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344014000159

Burston, J., & Giannakou, K. (2022). MALL language learning outcomes: A comprehensive meta-analysis 1994–2019. ReCALL, 34(2), 147-168. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344021000240

Das, S. S., & Roy, N. R. (2024). M-learning: A new definition in technology-based learning. In P. Kaliraj, G. Singaravelu, & T. Devi (Eds.), Transformative digital technology for disruptive teaching and learning (pp. 141-153). Auerbach Publications.

Diordieva, C., & Bonk, C. J. (2023). Instructors’ perspectives in design and L-MOOCs: A qualitative look. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(3), Article number ep425. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13099

Dziubaniuk, O., Ivanova-Gongne, M., & Nyholm, M. (2023). Learning and teaching sustainable business in the digital era: A connectivism theory approach. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), Article number 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00390-w

Gabriel, C., Grünke, J., & Karsten, N. (2022). Production and perception of L3 French prosody: Approaching German-Turkish heritage bilingualism. In H. Brandt, M. Krause, & I. Usanova (Eds.), Language development in diverse settings (pp. 331-356). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-35650-7_11

Gibson, W., & Brown, A. (2009). Working with qualitative data. SAGE Publications

Ginting, D., Sulistyo, T., Ismiyani, N., Sembiring, M. J., Asfihana, R., Fahmi, A., Suarniti, G. A. M. R., & Mulyani, Y. S. (2022). English language teachers multimedia knowledge in teaching using technology. World Journal of English Language, 12(6), 184-203. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v12n6p184

Hameed, A. R. A. G., & Sumari, P. B. (2024). Adoption and continued usage of mobile learning of virtual platforms in Iraqi higher education an unstable environment. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 4(2), 100242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2024.100242

Hatch, P., Rahman, M. A., & Michaelis, J. E. (2023). PATHWiSE: An authoring tool to support teachers to create robot-supported social learning experiences during homework. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 7(1), Article number 144. https://doi.org/10.1145/3579620

Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020, March 27). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning

Jablonkai, R. R., & Hou, J. (2023). English medium of instruction in Chinese higher education: A systematic mapping review of empirical research. Applied Linguistics Review, 14(6), 1483-1512. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2021-0179

John, J., & Lo, Y. Y. (2024). Improving English speaking proficiency among non-English major learners in Malaysia through mobile language learning applications. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 32(4), 1599 - 1618. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.32.4.17

Karakaya, K., & Bozkurt, A. (2022). Mobile-Assisted Language Learning (MALL) research trends and patterns through bibliometric analysis: Empowering language learners through ubiquitous educational technologies. System, 110, 102925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102925

Kearney, M., Schuck, S., Burden, K., & Aubusson, P. (2020). Viewing mobile learning from a pedagogical perspective. Research in Learning Technology, 20(1), 14406. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v20i0.14406

Khan, T., Kend, M., & Nguyen, L. A. (2023). Social media academic networking–insights from first-year accounting university students’ experiences. Higher Education Research & Development, 42(2), 306-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2022.2057449

Koutropoulos, A. (2023). Enabling rhizomatic collaborations: Social and technical factors that impact agile thinking and learning. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), New directions in rhizomatic learning (pp. 158-178). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003376378-13

Kruk, M. (2022). Dynamicity of perceived willingness to communicate, motivation, boredom and anxiety in Second Life: The case of two advanced learners of English. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(1-2), 190-216. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1677722

Kutuk, G., Putwain, D. W., Kaye, L. K., & Garrett, B. (2022). Relations between gender stereotyping and foreign language attainment: The mediating role of language learners’ anxiety and self‐efficacy. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 212-235. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12446

Langseth, I., Jacobsen, D. Y., & Haugsbakken, H. (2023). The role of support units in digital transformation: How institutional entrepreneurs build capacity for online learning in higher education. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 28(4), 1745-1782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-022-09620-y

Lee, M. (2019). The impact of using machine translation on EFL students’ writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(2), 157-175. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1553186

Li, R., Lund, A., & Nordsteien, A. (2023). The link between flipped and active learning: a scoping review. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(8), 1993-2027. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1943655

Liu, C., & Hwang, G. J. (2023). Roles and research trends of touchscreen mobile devices in early childhood education: Review of journal publications from 2010 to 2019 based on the technology-enhanced learning model. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(3), 1683-1702. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1855210

Liu, Y., Wang, H., & Zhao, R. (2020). Teacher agency and spaces in changes of English language education policy. Current Issues in Language Planning, 21(5), 548-566. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2020.1791532

Lord, G. (2015). “I don’t know how to use words in Spanish”: Rosetta Stone and learner proficiency outcomes. The Modern Language Journal, 99(2), 401-405. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12234_3

Macaro, E. (2020). Exploring the role of language in English medium instruction. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 23(3), 263-276. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2019.1620678

Nikolopoulou, K., Gialamas, V., & Lavidas, K. (2023). Mobile learning-technology barriers in school education: Teachers’ views. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 32(1), 29-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2022.2121314

Niño, A. (2020). Exploring the use of online machine translation for independent language learning. Research in Learning Technology, 28, 2402. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v28.2402

Nuesser, M., Zheng, D., & Dong, J. (2024). Optimizing affordances of high immersive virtual reality for language learning. Journal of China Computer-Assisted Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1515/jccall-2023-0006

Nurutdinova, A., Shakirova, D., Ismagilova, G., Fazlyeva, Z., Panfilova, E., Sheinina, D., Galeeva, G., & Ilminbetova, S. (2021). The integrating face-to-face learning, distance learning technologies and M-learning technologies: Effectiveness. In M. E. Auer & T. Tsiatsos (Eds.), Interactive mobile communication, technologies and learning (pp. 478-486). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96296-8_43

Okai-Ugbaje, S., Ardzejewska, K., & Imran, A. (2022). A mobile learning framework for higher education in resource constrained environments. Education and Information Technologies, 27(8), 11947-11969. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11094-5

Omodan, B. I. (2023). Analysis of connectivism as a tool for posthuman university classrooms. Journal of Curriculum Studies Research, 5(1), 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.46303/jcsr.2023.2

Qashou, A. (2021). Influencing factors in M-learning adoption in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 1755-1785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10323-z

Quinn, C. (2000). mLearning: Mobile, wireless, in-your-pocket learning. LineZine. http://www.linezine.com/2.1/features/cqmmwiyp.htm

Sakalauskė, A., & Leonavičiūtė, V. (2022). Strategic analysis of Duolingo language learning platform. Mokslas – Lietuvos Ateitis / Science – Future of Lithuania, 14. https://doi.org/10.3846/mla.2022.17731

Seufert, S., Guggemos, J., & Sailer, M. (2021). Technology-related knowledge, skills, and attitudes of pre-and in-service teachers: The current situation and emerging trends. Computers in Human Behavior, 115, 106552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106552

Sharples, M. (2000). The design of personal mobile technologies for lifelong learning. Computers & Education, 34(3-4), 177-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(99)00044-5

Steel, C. H., & Levy, M. (2013). Language students and their technologies: Charting the evolution 2006–2011. ReCALL, 25(3), 306-320. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344013000128

Thuy, N. T. T., & Yukawa, T. (2021). Mobile devices applied in self-studying English as a foreign language among non-native students in Vietnam and Japan. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 15(9), 70-87. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i09.19993

Tight, M. (2022). Internationalisation of higher education beyond the West: Challenges and opportunities–the research evidence. Educational Research and Evaluation, 27(3-4), 239-259. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2022.2041853

van Deusen‐Scholl, N. (2015). Assessing outcomes in online foreign language education: What are key measures for success? The Modern Language Journal, 99(2), 398-400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/modl.12234_2

Vesselinov, R. (2009). Measuring the effectiveness of Rosetta Stone [Final report]. Rosetta Stone. https://resources.rosettastone.com/CDN/us/pdfs/Measuring_the_Effectiveness_RS-5.pdf

Vesselinov, R., & Grego, J. (2012). The Duolingo efficacy study [Final report]. Duolingo. https://static.duolingo.com/s3/DuolingoReport_Final.pdf24

Vesselinov, R., & Grego, J. (2016a). The Babbel efficacy study [Final report]. Babbel. https://press.babbel.com/en/releases/downloads/Babbel-Efficacy-Study.pdf

Vesselinov, R., & Grego, J. (2016b). The Busuu efficacy study [Final report]. Busuu. https://blog.busuu.com/wpcontent/uploads/2016/05/The_busuu_Study2016.pdf

Vesselinov, R., & Grego, J. (2018). The Italki efficacy study [Final report]. Italki. https://www.gettingsmart.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/italki2018FinalReport.pdf

Wang, C., & Xu, Y. (2023). Who will work together? Factors infuencing autonomic group formation in an open learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(7), 3799-3817. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2190425

Werbach, K. (2014). (Re)defining gamification: A process approach, persuasive technology. In E. Bertina, W. Gao, B. Steffen, & M. Yung (Eds.), PERSUASIVE 2014: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 266-272). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07127-5_23

Yaqian, X., & Qinhua, Z. (2023). Research on the correlativity between individual status in social network and corresponding concept network characteristics in a cMOOC. Interactive Learning Environments 32(7), 3193-3207. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2170421

Zain, D. S. M., & Bowles, F. A. (2021). Mobile-assisted language learning (MALL) for higher education instructional practices in EFL/ESL contexts: A recent review of literature. Computer-Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal, 22(1), 283-307.

Zhang, R., & Zou, D. (2021). Types, features, and effectiveness of technologies in collaborative writing for second language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(9), 2391-2422. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1880441




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v12i1.40517

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Print ISSN: 2355-2794, Online ISSN: 2461-0275

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


View Journal Stats