Is the throne still for the people? A sociocultural linguistic analysis of Menanam adalah Melawan

Raden Safrina, Nita Novianti, Lina Meilinawati Rahayu

Abstract


Tahta untuk Rakyat ‘Throne for the People’, which is the principle that the highly respected Hamengkubuwono IX lived by as a democratic and nationalist King of Kesultanan Ngayogyakarta Hadiningrat, embodies the concept of the people, by the people, for the people. Under his rule, Kesultanan Ngayogyakarta Hadiningrat (Yogyakarta Sultanate in Indonesia) was committed to placing the people first. Nevertheless, the book Menanam adalah Melawan, or ‘Planting is Resisting’, challenges the very principle and questions the commitment of the present-day sultanate. The article explores the activist book, which contains the notes of an activist farmer who reflected on and wrote about his journeys and experiences as a farmer-turned-activist after the village where he farmed was claimed by the authorities, including the sultanate, and was planned to be made into a mining site. Fairclough’s sociocultural linguistics frames the analysis, and more specifically through Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA). The results indicate that at the micro level, Widodo’s writing uses emotive and technical language to construct a collective identity of marginalized farmers, opposing powerful entities like the sultanate and corporations. At the meso-level, the text challenges dominant power structures and neoliberal policies, advocating for social justice and a responsive monarchy, while emphasizing the need for transparency and genuine community partnership. The article indicates that the concern about the marginalized should take into account non-mainstream texts such as those produced by the marginalized so that social injustice can be minimized.

Keywords


activist literature; Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA); sociocultural linguistics; resistance

Full Text:

PDF

References


Absattar, A., Mambetova, M., & Zhubay, O. (2022). The potential of emotive language to influence the understanding of textual information in media coverage. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01232-2

Afandi, M. (2022, 13 May). Menanam adalah Melawan: Obituari Widodo, petani-pejuang dari Pesisir Kulon Progo menentang kerakusan Keraton Yogya [Planting is Resisting: The obituary of Widodo, the farmer-warrior from the Kulon Progo Coast who opposed the greed of the Yogyakarta Palace]. Project Multatuli. https://projectmultatuli.org/menanam-adalah-melawan-obituari-widodo-petani-pejuang-dari-pesisir-kulon-progo-menentang-kerakusan-keraton-yogya/

Ali Akbari Hamed, L., & Behnam, B. (2020). Linguistic devices of identity representation in English political discourse with a focus on personal pronouns: Power and solidarity. Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice, 13(26), 205-229.

Al-juboori, A. H., & Mustafa, S. S. (2022). Ideological discursive strategies in the work of American think tanks: A critical discourse analysis. World Journal of English Language, 12(5), 202-216. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v12n5p202

Al-Zahra, S. A., & Al-Ghezzey, K. H. A. (2022). A critical discourse analysis of feminist’s strategies in persuasion. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(6), 3633-3644.

Anderson, C. R., Maughan, C., & Pimbert, M. P. (2022). Transformative agroecology learning in Europe: building consciousness, skills and collective capacity for food sovereignty. In C. R. Anderson, R. B. Adell, M. P. Pimbert, & M. R. Ferre (eds) Critical adult education in food movements (pp. 11-27). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19400-9_2

Bouvier, G., & Machin, D. (2020). “Critical discourse analysis and the challenges and opportunities of social media.” In S. M. Guillem and C. Toula (Eds.), Critical discourse studies and/in communication (pp. 39-53). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003050353-3

Dubisar, A. M. (2021). Cultivating legitimacy as a farmer. Community Literacy Journal, 15(2), 31-51. https://doi.org/10.25148/CLJ.15.2.009619

Environmental Justice Atlas. (2022, May 2). Sand iron mining in Kulonprogo, Indonesia. EJAtlas. https://ejatlas.org/conflict/sand-iron-mining-in-kulonprogo-indonesia

Erll, A. (2023). Literary memory activism. In Y. Gutman & J. Wüstenberg (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of memory activism (pp. 411-416). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003127550-79

Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman.

Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Blackwell Publishing.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.

Fairclough, N., & Wodak, R. (1997). “Critical discourse analysis”. In Van D. Teun (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction (pp. 258 – 284). Sage.

Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Routledge.

Freire, P. (2020). Pedagogy of the oppressed. In J. Beck, C. Jenks, N. Keddie, & M. F. D. Young (Eds.), Toward a sociology of education (pp. 374-386). Routledge.

Gellen, S., & Lowe, R. D. (2021). (Re)constructing social hierarchies: A critical discourse analysis of an international charity’s visual appeals. Critical Discourse Studies, 18(2), 280-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1708762

Gorlewski, J. A. (Ed.). (2011). Power, resistance, and literacy: Writing for social justice. Information Age Publishing, Inc.

Heron, H., & Kim, M. S. (2023). Between chili farms and an aerotropolis: The struggle against the new airport in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. South East Asia Research, 31(1), 51-71.

https://doi.org/10.1080/0967828X.2023.2208371

Jamil, S., Ullah, K., & Nawab, H. U. (2024). Language, politics, and power: Unveiling Putin’s annexation narrative through Fairclough’s model. International Journal of Social Science Archives (IJSSA), 7(2), 24-33. https://ijssa.com/index.php/ijssa/article/view/257/191.

Kareem, A. S. (2024). A stylistic-critical discourse analysis of persuasive strategies in King Abdullah II’s speeches. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 21(2), 1486-1498. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.21.2.0539

Mahadika, A. (2020). Politik tanah: Gerakan perlawanan paguyuban petani lahan Pantai Kulon Progo terhadap tanah berstatus pakualam ground tahun 2016-2018. [Soil politics: Kulon Progo Beach land farmer association’s resistance movement against the land with Pakalam ground status in 2016-2018]. Paradigma POLISTAAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 3(2), 132-144.

Mazak, C. (2020). Appropriation and resistance in the (English) literacy practices of Puerto Rican farmers. In V. Purcell-Gates (Ed.), Cultural practices of literacy (pp. 25-40). Routledge.

Mullet, D. R. (2018). A general critical discourse analysis framework for educational research. Journal of Advanced Academics, 29(2), 116–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X18758260

Muzari, T., Shava, G. N., & Shonhiwa, S. (2022). Qualitative research paradigm, a key research design for educational researchers, processes and procedures: A theoretical overview. Indiana Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(1), 14-20.

Oudenampsen, M. (2022). Neoliberal sermons: European Christian democracy and neoliberal governmentality. Economy and Society, 51(2), 330-352. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2022.1987743

Prehantoro, P. (2020). Special Region of Yogyakarta in the perspective of asymmetric decentralization reviewed from the Law Number 13 Year 2012. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 7(8), 451-458. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v7i8.1946

Richard, B. (2024). Discursive strategies of manipulation in President Bola Tinubu’s subsidy removal discourse. Journal of Languages, Linguistics and Literary Studies, 4(2), 43-48.

Riyadi, S. (2022, June 16). Mengenang Widodo: Menanam adalah Melawan. [Remembering Widodo: Planting is Resistance]. Majalah Sedane. https://majalahsedane.org/2022/06/16/mengenang-widodo-menanam-adalah-melawan/8421/tokoh/adminsedane/

Roem, M., Lubis, M., Mochtar, L., Maimoen, S. (1982). Tahta untuk rakyat: Celah-celah kehidupan Sultan Hamengkubuwono IX (Atmakusumah, ed.).[A throne for the people: The glimpses of the life of Sultan Hamengkubuwono IX (Atmakusumah, ed]. Gramedia.

Sardjo, S., Dharmawan, A. H., Darusman, D., & Wahyuni, E. S. (2022). Transformation of farmer resistance in conservation areas: Land occupation by farmers in Mount Halimun-Salak National Park, West Java. Masyarakat, Jurnal Sosiologi, 27(1), 8. 10.7454/MJS.v27i1.13466

Scott, J. C. (1985). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. Yale University Press.

Shepherd, R. (2024). Masking the Critic: A critical discourse analysis of newspaper editorials. In R. Durgasingh & N. Selvon-Ramkissoon (Eds.), Caribbean discourses: Stylistic and critical discourse approaches to language use in the Caribbean (pp. 131-176). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45047-1_6

Suliadi, S. (2016). Dinamika resistensi petani terhadap ekspansi kapitalisme di Jawa (Studi atas perlawanan petani terhadap pertambangan pasir besi di Karangwuni Kulon Progo). [The dynamics of farmer resistance to the expansion of capitalism in Java (Study of farmer resistance to iron sand mining in Karangwuni Kulon Progo]. Jurnal Sosiologi Reflektif, 9(2), 79-102.

Thiong’o, N. W. (1986). Decolonising the mind: The politics of language in African literature. James Currey.

Tim Kolaborasi Liputan Agraria. (2021, September 8). Was-was petani pesisir Kulonprogo kala lahan tani terancam tambang. [Coastal Kulonprogo farmers’ concerns as farmland faces threat from mining]. Mongabay Indonesia. https://www.mongabay.co.id/2021/09/08/was-was-petani-pesisir-kulonprogo-kala-lahan-tani-terancam-tambang-1/

Toumbourou, T. D., Dressler, W. H., Sanders, A., Liu, E., Brown, T., & Utomo, A. (2023). Who are the future farmers? Media representations of youth in agriculture, food security and ‘modern’ farming in Indonesia. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 64(2), 188-208. https://doi.org/10.1111/apv.12374

Truong, V. A. (2023). Applying CDA/SFG in editorials to show power relations and ideology in language use. Binh Duong University Journal of Science and Technology/Education–Social Sciences, 6(3), 149-158. https://doi.org/10.56097/binhduonguniversityjournalofscienceandtechnology.v6i3.180

Wang, X. (2021). Construing community with a shared future in President Xi Jinping’s diplomatic discourse (2013-2018): The role of personal pronouns we and they. Critical Arts, 35(3), 35-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/02560046.2021.1985154

Widiyanti, E., Karsidi, R., Wijaya, M., & Utari, P. (2020). Identity gaps and negotiations among layers of young farmers: Case study in Indonesia. Open Agriculture, 5(1), 361-374.https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2020-0041

Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2009). “Critical discourse analysis: History, agenda, theory, and methodology.” In R. Wodak, & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods for critical discourse analysis (pp. 1-33). Sage.

Widodo. (2013). Menanam adalah melawan. [Planting is resisting]. Pustaka Sebelas.

Yang, Y. (2023). Ideology in critical discourse study: A review of literature. Journal of the University of Ruhuna, 11(2), 53-63. https://doi.org/10.4038/jur.v11i2.8012

Yanuardy, D. (2012). Commoning, dispossession projects and resistance: A land dispossession project for sand iron mining in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Paper presented at the International Conference on Global Land Grabbing II (pp. 1-26). Cornell University. https://cornell-landproject.org/download/landgrab2012papers/yanuardy.pdf

Zulfikar, A., Nawaz, M. B., & Khalid, A. (2022). A critical discourse analysis of ideological structures in the editorials of two English newspapers of Pakistan. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(8), 9555-9565.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v11i3.40890

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Print ISSN: 2355-2794, Online ISSN: 2461-0275

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


View Journal Stats