Building teacher agency through collaborative lesson planning: Student teachers evaluative perspectives

Toshinobu Nagamine

Abstract


This qualitative study explores collaborative lesson planning (CLP) in an English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teacher education program in Japan, with a focus on student teachers peer assessments. Amid ongoing education reforms that emphasize teacher collaboration and curriculum management, CLP serves as a platform for developing lesson design, curriculum alignment, and teamwork skills. This study investigates two key questions: (a) What aspects of peers work in CLP do student teachers evaluate? and (b) What justifications do they provide for their evaluations? Nineteen student teachers participated in a 10-week CLP task, designing a 50-minute English lesson and providing written peer assessments. Content analysis, integrating text mining techniques and constant comparison analysis, revealed that participants evaluated their peers from multiple perspectives. Patterns emerged regarding differences in evaluation tendencies based on sex and English language proficiency. Male participants tended to prefer formal verbal interactions, while female participants were more inclined to prioritize group cohesion and harmony. Participants with high English language proficiency emphasized logical reasoning and critical thinking, often assuming leadership roles, yet sometimes faced challenges in collaborative engagement. These findings underscore the importance of balanced group composition in supporting different collaboration styles and maximizing CLP effectiveness. This study highlights the value of rubric-free peer assessments in capturing diverse perspectives and nuanced evaluations, granting student teachers greater autonomy in defining effective collaboration. The results have broad implications for teacher education worldwide, advocating for structured CLP practices that cultivate both pedagogical and interpersonal skills essential for future agentic teachers.

Keywords


collaborative lesson planning; EFL teacher education; Japan; peer assessment

Full Text:

PDF

References


Angus-Cole, K. (2021). Education brief: Teacher professional development. Cambridge University Press & Assessment. https://www.cambridgeinternational.org/

Avgitidou, S. (2009). Participation, roles and processes in a collaborative action research project: A reflexive account of the facilitator. Educational Action Research, 17(4), 585–600.

Bailey, R. A. (2009). Undergraduate students’ perceptions of the role and utility of written assessment feedback. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, (1). doi: 10.47408/jldhe.v0i1.29.

Bassett, S., Bowler, M., & Newton, A. (2013). Schemes of work, units of work and lesson planning. In S. Capel, M. Leask, & T. Turner (eds.), Learning to teach in the secondary school: A companion to school experience (6th ed.) (pp 65–76). Routledge.

Beckmann, T., & Ehmke, T. (2023). Informal and formal lesson planning in school internships: Practices among pre-service teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 132, 104249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104249

Borg, S. (2006). Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice. Continuum.

Bouchrika, I. (2023). Teacher collaboration guide: Strategies, statistics & benefits. https://research.com/education/teacher-collaboration-guide

Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2006). Aligning assessment with long-term Learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 399–413.

Brookhart, S. M., & Chen, F. (2015). The quality and effectiveness of descriptive rubrics. Educational Review, 67(3), 343–368.

Bruce, C. D., Flynn, T., & Stagg-Peterson, S. (2011). Examining what we mean by collaboration in collaborative action research: A cross-case analysis. Educational Action Research, 19(4), 433–452. DOI: 10.1080/09650792.2011.625667

Bryant, D. A., & Carless, D. R. (2010). Peer assessment in a test-dominated setting: Empowering, boring or facilitating examination preparation? Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 9(1), 3–15. DOI: 10.1007/s10671-009-9077-2

Carroll, K., Patrick, S. K., & Goldring, E. (2021). School factors that promote teacher collaboration: Results from the Tennessee Instructional Partnership Initiative. American Journal of Education, 127(4). https://doi.org/10.1086/715002

Clark, C., & Dunn, S. (1991). Second generation research on teacher planning. In H. C. Warren & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Effective teaching: Current research (pp. 183–200). McCatchum.

Day, C., & Lee, J. C. (Eds.). (2011). New understandings of teacher’s work: Emotions and educational change. Springer.

Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999). The use of self-, peer- and co-assessment in higher education: A review. Studies in Higher Education, 24(3), 331–350. DOI: 10.1080/03075079912331379935

Farrell, T. S. C. (2006). ‘The teacher is an octopus’: Uncovering preservice English language teachers’ prior beliefs through metaphor analysis” RELC Journal, 37(2), 147–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688206067430

Farrell, T. S. C. (2007). Reflective language teaching: From research to practice. Continuum.

Farrell, T. S. C. (2015). Promoting teacher reflection in second language education: A framework for TESOL professionals. Routledge.

Fautley, M., & Savage, J. (2013) Lesson planning for effective learning. Open University Press.

Freeman, D., & Richards, J. C. (1993). Conceptions of teaching and the education of second language teachers. TESOL Quarterly, 27(2), 193–216.

Fullan, M. (2015). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). Teachers College Press.

Gao, M. (2009). Students' voices in school-based assessment of Hong Kong: A case study. In D. M. McInerney, G. T. L. Brown, & G. A. D. Liem (Eds.), Student perspectives on assessment: What students can tell us about assessment for learning (pp. 107–130). Information Age.

Gebhard, J. G., & Oprandy, R. (1999). Language teaching awareness: A guide to exploring beliefs and practices. Cambridge University Press.

Geert, K. (2006). Teacher collaboration and collegiality as workplace conditions: A review. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 52(2), 220–237. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:4454

Goodson, I. F. (2003). Professional knowledge, professional lives: Studies in education and change. Open University Press.

Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Sociology Press.

Glaser, B. G. (1992). Discovery of grounded theory. Aldine.

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine.

Hall, P., & Simeral, A. (2008). Building teachers’ capacity for success: A collaborative approach for coaches and school leaders. Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.

Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. Teachers College Press.

Harris, L. R., & Brown, G. T. L. (2013). Opportunities and obstacles to consider when using peer- and self-assessment to improve student learning: Case studies into teachers’ implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 36, 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.07.008

Hiebert, J., & Stigler, J. W. (2000). A proposal for improving classroom teaching: Lessons from the TIMSS video study. The Elementary School Journal, 101 (1),4–21.

Higuchi, K. (2016). KH Coder 3 reference manual. https://khcoder.net/en/

Higuchi, K. (2023). KH Coder (3.Beta.07d) [computer software]. https://khcoder.net/en/

Hwang, G. J., Hung, C. M., & Chen, N. S. (2014). Improving learning achievements, motivations and problem-solving skills through a peer assessment-based game development approach. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62, 129–145. DOI: 10.1007/s11423-013-9320-7

Johnson, A. (2000). It’s time for Madeline Hunter to go: A new look at lesson plan design. Action in Teacher Education, 22(1), 72–78.

Johnson, B. (2003). Teacher collaboration: Good for some, not so good for others. Educational Studies, 29(4), 337–350. DOI: 10.1080/0305569032000159651

Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity, and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2, 130–144.

Kang, H. (2017). Preservice teachers’ learning to plan intellectually challenging tasks. Journal of Teacher Education, 68(1), 55–68.

Kibler, A. K., & Palacios, M. C. (2022). Teacher collaboration to support multilingual students designated as English learners: Ecological perspectives and critical questions. NYS TESOL Journal, 9(2), 3–8.

Kumaravadivelu, B. (2001). Toward a postmethod pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 35(4), 537–560.

Leithwood, K., & Beatty, B. (2008). Leading with teacher emotions in mind. Corwin Press.

Lewis, C. (2002). Lesson Study: A handbook of teacher-led instructional improvement. Research for Better Schools.

Li, H., Zhao, C., Long, T., Huang, Y., & Shu, F. (2021). Exploring the reliability and its influencing factors of peer assessment in massive open online courses. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(6), 2263–2277. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13143

Lieberman, A. (1986). Collaborative work. Educational leadership, 44, 4–8.

Louis, K. S., & Marks, H. M. (1998). Does professional community affect the classroom? Teachers' work and student experiences in restructuring schools. American Journal of Education, 106(4), 532–575.

Lynch, D. H., & Golen, S. (1992). Peer evaluation of writing in business communication classes. Journal of Education for Business, 68(1), 44–48. DOI: 10.1080/08832323.1992.10117585

Martínez Agudo, J. de D. (Ed.) (2018). Emotions in second language teaching: Theory, research and teacher education. Springer.

Mendoza, N. B., Cheng, E. C., & Yan, Z. (2022). Assessing teachers’ collaborative lesson planning practices: Instrument development and validation using the SECI knowledge-creation model. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 73, 101139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101139

McHenry, A. N. (2009). The relationship between leadership behaviors, teacher collaboration, and student achievement (Doctoral dissertation). https://aquila.usm.edu/

MEXT. (2015). Gakushushido Yoryoto no Rinen wo Jitsugensurutameni Hitsuyona Hosaku [Necessary measures to actualize the principles of the national curriculum guidelines]. https://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/shingi/chukyo/chukyo3/siryo/attach/1364306.htm

Mora-Ruano, J. G., Heine, J-H, & Gebhardt, M. (2019). Does teacher collaboration improve student achievement? Analysis of the German PISA 2012 sample. Frontiers in Education, 4(85). DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2019.00085

Mostafa, T., & Pál, J. (2018). Science teachers’ satisfaction: Evidence from the PISA 2015 teacher survey (OECD Education Working Papers No. 168). https://doi.org/10.1787/1ecdb4e3-en

Mutton, T., Hagger, H., & Burn, K. (2011). Learning to plan, planning to learn: The developing expertise of beginning teachers. Teachers and Teaching, 17(4), 399–416.

Nagamine, T. (2017). The potential for non-native teachers to effectively teach speaking in a Japanese EFL context. In J. de D. Martínez Agudo (Ed.), Native and non-native teachers in English language classrooms: Professional challenges and teacher education (pp. 161–180). De Gruyter Mouton.

Nagamine, T. (2018). L2 teachers’ professional burnout and emotional stress: Facing frustration and demotivation toward one’s profession in a Japanese EFL context. In J. de D. Martínez Agudo (Ed.), Emotions in second language teaching: Theory, research and teacher education (pp. 259–275). Springer.

Nagamine, T. (2023a). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on English teachers’ cognition and emotions. In F. Uslu (Ed.), Abstracts & proceedings of SOCIOINT 2023: 10th international conference on education and education of social sciences (pp. 39–49). OCERINT. https://doi.org/10.46529/socioint.202304

Nagamine, T. (2023b). Agency in the conceptual development of language: Lev Vygotsky’s framework and its implications for pedagogical innovations. Journal of Applied Language and Literacy Studies, 2(2), 1–15.

Nishino, T. (2012). Modeling teacher beliefs and practices in context: A multimethods approach. The Modern Language Journal, 96(3), 380–399. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01364.x

Nishioka, K. (2008). Issues surrounding academic achievement in Japan: Examining the 2008 revisions of the National Courses of Study. Educational Studies in Japan: International Yearbook, 3, 5–16.

Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. Oxford University Press.

Nordrum, L., Evans, K., & Gustafsson, M. (2013). Comparing student learning experiences of in-text commentary and rubric-articulated feedback: Strategies for formative assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(8), 919–940.

OECD (2014). What helps teachers feel valued and satisfied with their jobs? Teaching in Focus, 5. OECD Publishing. DOI: 10.1787/5jxzbtw4gzg3-en

Price, H. E. (2011). Principal–teacher Interactions: How affective relationships shape principal and teacher attitudes. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(1), 39–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X11417126

Rahman, M. S. (2019). Teachers’ peer support: Difference between perception and practice. Teacher Development, 23(1), 121–138.

Reddy, Y. M., & Andrade, H. (2010). A review of rubric use in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(4), 435–448.

Reinholz, D. (2016). The assessment cycle: A model for learning through peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation In Higher Education, 41(2), 301–315. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1008982

Reio, T. G., Jr. (2011). Teacher emotions and socialization-related learning in the context of educational change. In C. Day & J. C. Lee (Eds.), New understandings of teacher’s work: Emotions and educational change (pp. 105–118). Springer.

Reio, T. G., Jr., & Lasky, S. L. (2007). Teacher risk taking changes in the context of school reform: A sociocultural and cognitive motivational perspective. In D. M. McInerney & S. Van Etton (Eds.), Standards in education: Vol. 7. Research on sociocultural influences on motivation and learning (pp. 13–32). Information Age.

Richards, J. C., & Farrell, T. S. C. (2011). Practice teaching: A reflective approach. Cambridge University Press.

Rusznyak, L., & Walton, E. (2011). Lesson planning guidelines for student teachers: A scaffold for the development of pedagogical content knowledge. Education as Change, 15(1), 271–285.

Sánchez , D. C., & Chapetón, C. M. (2021). Critical literacy in teacher education: Analyzing insights from EFL pre-service teachers in a Colombian public university. International Journal of Language Studies, 15(4), 1–28.

Schutz, P. A., & Zembylas, M. (Eds.) (2011). Advances in teacher emotion research: The impact on teachers’ lives. Springer.

Smith, P. K., & Pellegrini, A. D. (Eds.) (2000). Psychology of education: Major themes. Routledge/Falmer.

Stearns, E., Banerjee, N., Moller, S., & Mickelson, R. A. (2015). Collective pedagogical teacher culture and teacher satisfaction. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 117(8). https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811511700803

Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. University of Cambridge Press.

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage.

Topping, K. J. (2003). Self and peer assessment in school and university: Reliability, validity and utility. In M. Segers, F. Dochy, & E. Cascallar (Eds), Optimising new modes of assessment: In search of qualities and standards, pp. 55–87. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48125-1_4

Topping, K. J. (2013). Peers as a source of formative and summative assessment. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 395–412). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452218649

van Gennip, N., Gijbels, D., Segers, M., & Tillema, H. H. (2010). Reactions to 360º feedback: The role of trust and trust-related variables. International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, 10(4), 362–379. DOI: 10.1504/IJHRDM.2010.036088

Veen, K. V., & Sleegers, P. (2011). Teachers’ emotions in a context of reforms: To a deeper understanding of teachers and reforms. In P. A. Schutz & M. Zembylas (Eds.), Advances in teacher emotion research: The impact on teachers’ lives (pp. 233–251). Springer.

VERBI Software. (2021). MAXQDA 2022 Analytics Pro [computer software]. VERBI Software. https://www.maxqda.com/

Vincent-Lancrin, S., Jacotin, G., Urgel, J., Kar, S., & González-Sancho, C. (2017). Measuring innovation in education: A journey to the future. OECD Publishing.

Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd ed.). Merrill/Prentice Hall.

Yen, A. C. (1991). The art and craft of teaching: Art resting on craft. Saint Louis University Public Law Review 10, 241–245.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v12i2.42271

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Print ISSN: 2355-2794, Online ISSN: 2461-0275

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


View Journal Stats