Improving Reading Comprehension Using Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL)

Yudha Aprizani


This study aimed to find out whether teaching-learning reading comprehension using Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) would get better results than using Direct Instruction approach. The research used a quantitative method. The population of the research was students from the Islamic University of Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al-Banjari. The researcher used cluster random sampling to select two sample groups, the control group and the experimental group. The control group with 25 students was the class that continued to use the Direct Instruction approach. The experimental group, with 20 students, was the class tested using the CTL approach. The test was a written test with five multiple choice questions plus an essay test. The test was used to obtain the data. The students’ scores were the data for the study of reading comprehension comparing CTL and Direct Instruction. Based on the results of the study, the researcher found that CTL was more effective than Direct Instruction because the null hypothesis was rejected and the alternative hypothesis was accepted so that CTL was found to be better for teaching reading skills. CTL encourages materials that are related to the students’ surrounding so that it helps them use English related to their daily activities.


reading comprehension; Contextual Teaching and Learning; direct instruction

Full Text:



Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching, 4th Ed. New York: Longman Inc.

Brown, H. D. (2004). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. New York: Pearson Education.

Ellis, R. (1986). Understanding second language acquisition. New York: Oxford University Press.

Emmit, M., & Pollock, J. (1991). Language and learning. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

Gagné, R. (1985). The conditions of learning and the theory of instruction (4th Ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

Harmer, J. (2007). How to teach English. Essex: Pearson Education.

Johnson, B. E. (2002). Contextual Teaching Learning: What it is and why it is here to stay. London: Sage Publication Ltd.

Klingner, K., J., Vaughn, S., & Boardman, A. (2007). Teaching reading comprehension to students with learning difficulties. In New York: The Guilford Press.

Linse, C. T., & Nunan, D. (2005). Practical English language teaching: Young learners. New York: McGraw-HilI.

Pang S. E., Muaka, A., Bernbart, B. E., & Kamil, M. L. (2003). Teaching reading. Geneva: International Bureau of Education Publication, Inc.

Peni, K. K. (2011). The effectiveness of Contextual Teaching Learning to Teach Reading Comprehension Viewed from Students’ Intelligence. (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta.

Riduwan. (2011). Dasar-dasar statistika. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Satriani, I., Emilia, E., & Gunawan, M. H. (2012). Contextual Teaching and Learning approach to teaching writing. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 10-22.

Sears, S. (2003). Introduction to Contextual Teaching and Learning I. Bloomington: Phil Delta Kappa Educational Foundation

Sugiyono. (2007). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2008). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suprijono, A. (2009). Cooperative learning teori & aplikasi PAIKEM. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Tuckman, B. W. (1999). Conducting educational research, 5th Ed. Orlando: Harcourt Brace


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Print ISSN: 2355-2794, Online ISSN: 2461-0275

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

View Journal Stats