Initiating Payment of Trafficking Restitution from a Victims Perspective

Rina Melati Sitompul, Andi Maysarah

Abstract


The objective of this study was to offer policy concept ideas in fulfilling restitution for the victims in accordance with the required attainment of justice. Restitution related to the payment of costs charged to the person based on a court decision that has permanent legally enforceable for the costs suffered by the victim or heir. This study used a normative method using a statutory approach and a case approach. From the three court decisions and one trafficking case in the constabulary, the victim's comprehension of the legal handling experienced is sufficient to accommodate the victim's wishes in obtaining victim's rights. Conclusions are drawn through an inductive to deductive thought process. Of the three decisions reviewed, it proved that the application of restitution payments was not able to fulfill a sense of justice for the victim. In fact, in practice, the fulfillment of compensation payments is in the non-penal space, from the perspective of victim recognition, it is sufficient to accommodate their wishes and hopes for the fulfillment of the expected restitution rights. In order to provide legal certainty for victims of the fulfillment of restitution rights, a legal breakthrough is required. The diversion method as a confirmation of ensuring the payment of the victim's restitution right is an offer. The concept of diversion can be carried out with the limitation of the criteria for the impact experienced by the victim, and the legality of legality is determined through a court decision or decision, as legal achievement through restorative justice is able to restore conflicts from perpetrators and victims.


Keywords


restitution policy; diversion method; refund payment; victims of trafficking.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Books

Ali, A. (2012). Menguak Teori Hukum (Legal Theori) dan Teori Peradilan (Judicialprudence). Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Arif, B. N. (2008). Kebijakan Hukum Pidana, Perkembangan Penyusunan Konsep KUHP Baru. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group

Hamzah, A. (2008). Asas-asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Kenedi, J. (2020). Kebijakan Hukum Pidana (Penal Policy) Dalam Sistem Penegakkan Hukum di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Mulyadi, M. (2008). Criminal Policy, Pendekatan Integral Penal Policy dan Non Penal Policy dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan Kekerasan. Medan: Pustaka Bangsa Perss

Nuraeny, H. (2011). Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang, Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dan Pencegahannya. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Suteki. (2013). Desain Hukum di Ruang Sosial. Semarang: Thafa Media.

Suteki & Taufani, G. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum (Filsafat, Teori dan Praktik). Depok: Rajawali Pers.

Tridiatno, Y. A. (2015). Keadilan Restoratif. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka.

Journal Articles

Daud, B. S., & Sopoyono, E. (2019). Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Perdagangan Manusia (Human Trafficking) di Indonesia. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 1(3), 352–365.

Jumiati. (2015). Model Perlindungan Korban Perdagangan Orang dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jurisprudence, 5(1):1-8.

Marasabessy, F. (2016). Restitusi Bagi Korban Tindak Pidana: Sebuah Tawaran Mekanisme Baru. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 45(1): 53-75.

Rosnawati & Din, M. (2016). Kepastian Hukum Hak Restitusi terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang (TPPO) Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2007 (Penelitian di Wilayah Hukum Pengadilan Negeri Banda Aceh). Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(1): 1-7.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v23i1.18276

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
P-ISSN 0854-5499
E-ISSN 2527-8428
Published by Faculty of LawUniversitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia