Reformulation of the Position of Auxiliary State Institutions as Legal Standing Related to Authority Disputes of State Institution

Mirja Fauzul Hamdi

Abstract


This research aims to examine the reformulation meaning of legal standing of state institutions in authority disputes cases between state institutions and the juridical implications of the legal standing of auxiliary state institutions as parties in the authority disputes cases of state institutions. Authority disputes may arise along with the development of state institutions based on their needs and interests in dealing with certain legal issues. This approach uses a normative method with descriptive analytical specifications. The results of the study show that the meaning of state institutions which can be the legal standing in the authority disputes cases between state institutions is not only interpreted by state institutions that are formed and given authority according to the 1945 Constitution. Auxiliary state institutions, which on the one hand carry out their functions as a form of derivation from the 1945 Constitution, can become state institutions litigating at the Constitutional Court. Regarding the implications of determining legal standing for state institutions that are formed by laws to litigate at the Constitutional Court, in fact it does not change the authority of the Constitutional Court itself according to Article 24c of the 1945 Constitution. The state institutions that become the legal standing at the Constitutional Court must of course be able to prove that their objectum litis is a derivation of the constitution.


Keywords


structural reformulation; legal standing; authority dispute; state institutions.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Books

Ali. L. (1995). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Arifin, F. (2005). Lembaga Negara dan Sengketa Kewenangan Antar lembaga Negara, Jakarta: Konsorsium Reformasi Hukum Nasional.

Asshiddiqie, J. (2006). Sengketa Kewenangan Antar lembaga Negara, Jakarta: Konstitusi Press.

Asshiddiqie, J. (2006). Perkembangan dan Konsolidasi Lembaga Negara Pasca Reformasi, Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi.

Echols, J. M. & Shadily, H. (2003). Kamus Inggris Indonesia, Jakarta: Gramedia.

Hadjon, P. M. (1993). Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia, Yogyakarta: UGM Press.

Harjono. (2008). Konstitusi sebagai Rumah Bangsa, Pemikiran Hukum Dr. Harjono, S.H.,M.C.L., Wakil Ketua MK, Jakarta: Sekretariat Jendral dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi.

Indroharto. (2000). Usaha Memahami Undang-Undang tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara: Buku I Beberapa Pengertian Dasar Hukum Tata Usaha Negara, Jakarta: Sinar Harapan.

Loudoe, J. Z. (1985). Menemukan Hukum Melalui Tafsir dan Fakta, Jakarta: Bina Aksara.

Mertokusumo, S. (1981). Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Jakarta: Liberty.

Mulyosudarmo, S. (1997). Peralihan Kekuasaan Kajian Teoritis dan Yuridis Terhadap Pidato Nawaksara, Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Nurmawati, M. (2016). Sengketa Kewenangan Lembaga Negara, Bali: Fakultas Hukum Udayana.

Ridwan. (2016). Hukum Administrasi Negara, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Siahaan, M. (2006). Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteran Mahkamah Konstitusi.

Journal Article

Asshiddiqie, J. (2003). Struktur Ketatanegaraan Indonesia Setelah Perubahan Keempat Undang-Undang Dasar 1945. National Law Development Seminar with the theme Law Enforcement in the Era of Sustainable Development. 1(1).

Eddyono, L. W. (2008). Metode Penafsiran. Majalah Konstitusi, 21(1): 1-15.

Eddyono, L. W. (2010). Penyelesaian Sengketa Kewenangan Lembaga Negara oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi, 7(3): 1-48.

Eddyono, L. W. (2019). Progresivitas Putusan Sengketa Kewenangan Lembaga Negara dan Pembaharuan Hukum Acara. Jurnal Konstitusi, 16(1): 127-147

Huda, N. (2017). Potensi Sengketa Kewenangan Lembaga Negara dan Penyelesaiannya di Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Ius Quia Iustum, 24(2): 193-212.

Nurtjahjo. H. (2005). Lembaga, Badan, dan Komisi Negara Independen di Indonesia: Tinjauan Hukum Tata Negara. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 35(3): 275-280.

Sepriyono. (2014). Kedudukan Komisi Negara Independen dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia. Thesis. Padang: Universitas Andalas.

Simamora, J. (2016). Problematika Penyelesaian Sengketa Kewenangan Lembaga Negara oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Mimbar Hukum, 28(1): 77-92.

Sulaiman. (2018). Paradigma dalam Penelitian Hukum. Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 20(2): 255-272.

Triningsih, A. & Mardiya, N. Q. (2017). Interpretasi Lembaga Negara dan Sengketa Lembaga Negara Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Kewenangan Lembaga Negara. Jurnal Konstitusi, 14(4): 779-798.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v23i1.19869

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
P-ISSN 0854-5499
E-ISSN 2527-8428
Published by Faculty of Law, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia