EXAMINING THE REGULATION OF INDEPENDENT PROCEDURE AT THE INDONESIAN INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COURT
Abstract
This study aims to examine whether the current industrial relations court procedural law system is sufficiently ideal as a reference for the settlement of industrial relations disputes in Indonesia and to test the urgency of regulating independent procedural law in the Court of Indonesian Industrial Relations. This is a normative legal research with a statutory approach, a conceptual approach and comparative approach. The result shows that the industrial relation court procedural law system is not ideal enough to accommodate the development and complexity of disputes that occur in Indonesian labor today. Simple, quick and inexpensive way of settling dispute is difficult to occur when the procedural law that is enforced still adopts or is unable to escape from HIR, RBg, RV as civil procedural law (colonial product), which has a general character. The Industrial Relations Court as one of the Special Courts must be able to show its independent character, including in regulating procedural law. Comparative studies with the state of Thailand, Malaysia and Japan are used in this paper in order to illustrate the importance of the regulation concerning the Industrial Relations Court procedures. Changes to the procedural law of the Industrial Relation Court are urgent to do in order to provide an effective and efficient means of dispute resolution that is able to represent simple, quick and inexpensive principles according to the needs or demands of workers and employers today
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bibliography
Books
Marnisah, L. (2019). Hubungan Industrial dan Kompensasi (Teori dan Praktik). Deepublish.
Pangaribuan, J. (2017). Seluk Beluk Hukum Acara Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial. MISI.
Sejati, H. H., & SH, M. (2018). Rekonstruksi Pemeriksaan Perkara di Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Berbasis Nilai Cepat, Adil, dan Murah. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Sharma, B., & International Law Book Services. (1996). Industrial relations in ASEAN : a comparative study. University of New Brunswick.
Journal Articles
Ashgar Ali Ali Mohamed. (2004). A Critical Appraisal of the Adjudication Process of Dismissal Under the Industrial Relations Act, 1967. The Journal of the Malaysian Bar, XXXIII(3), 19.
Brown, R. C. (2012). Comparative Alternative Dispute Resolution for individual labor disputes in Japan, China and the United States: Lesson from Asia? St. John’S Law Review, 86, 543–577.
Elbo, R. A. H. (2004). Labor Tribunal System : Prospects of Japan ’ s New Approach Towards the Efficient Settlement of Individual Labor Disputes. The Japan Institute for Labour Policy and Training, 2004. https://www.jil.go.jp/profile/documents/Elbo.pdf
Feng, J., & Xie, P. (2020). Is mediation the preferred procedure in labour dispute resolution systems? Evidence from employer–employee matched data in China. Journal of Industrial Relations, 62(1), 81–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022185619834971
Hadwiger, F. (2017). Looking to the future: mediation and arbitration procedures for global framework agreements. Transfer, 23(4), 409–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258916679574
Honami, M. (2007). How Successful is Japan ’ s Labor Tribunal System ?: The Labor Tribunal ’ s Limited Scope and Effectiveness. Law, Asian-Pacific Journal, Policy, 16(1), 83–100.
Marx, A., Ebert, F., & Hachez, N. (2017). Dispute settlement for labour provisions in EU free trade agreements: Rethinking current approaches. Politics and Governance, 5(4), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v5i4.1070
Maryono, D., & Azhar, M. (2018). Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial: Beberapa Catatan Masukan RUU Hukum Acara Perdata. Administrative Law and Governance Journal, 1(3), 345–350. https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v1i3.345-350
Nuryanti, Dewa Ayu Febryana Putra. Sumertayasa, P. G. A. (2016). Peran Dan Fungsi Pemerintah Dalam Hubungan Industrial. Kertha Semaya, Vol 6(No 8), 2.
Okene, O. V. C., & Emejuru, C. T. (2015). The Disputes of Rights Versus Disputes of Interests’ Dichotomy in Labour Law: The Case of Nigerian Labour Law. In HeinOnline (Vol. 35). Online.
PN, S. S. (2018). Karakteristik Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial. Mimbar Yustitia, 2(1), 87–111.
Putra, D. N. R. A., Sudiarawan, K. A., & Mahartha, A. (2020). Interest Dispute Settlement Related to Workers’ Health Care Security in Indonesia. Udayana Journal of Law and Culture, 4(1), 62–80.
Shukor, S. F. A., Mohamad, A. A. A., & Hamid, Z. A. (2019). PAMPASAN KEWANGAN DALAM KES PEMBUANGAN KERJA SECARA TIDAK ADIL: PELAKSANAAN MAHKAMAH PERUSAHAAN DI MALAYSIA (Awarding of Monetary Compensation for Unfair Dismissal Cases: Implementation by the Industrial Court of Malaysia). Kanun: Jurnal Undang-Undang Malaysia, 31(2), 251–269. http://jurnal.dbp.my/index.php/Kanun/article/view/4782
Sugeno, K., & Yamakoshi, K. (2014). Dismissals in Japan. Part one: how strict is japanese law on employers? Japan Labor Review, 11(2), 83–92.
Tobing, C. N. M. (2018). Menggagas pengadilan hubungan industrial dalam bingkai ius constituendum sebagai upaya perwujudan kepastian hukum dan keadilan/Initiating an industrial relations court in the framework of ius constituendum as an effort to realize legal certainty and justi. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 7(2), 297–326.
Umar, N. (2013). STUDI HUKUM PERBANDINGAN SISTEM KETATANEGARAANMALAYSIA DAN INDONESIA. Cahkim, IX(2), 112–126.
Yamakawa, R. (2004). The Labor Dispute Resolution System in Japan : Recent Developments , Their Background and Future Prospects. 168(Chart 2), 1–15.
Yamakawa, R. (2005). The Labor Dispute Resolution System in Japan : Recent Developments , Their Background and Future Prospects. 168.
Yoshida, M. (2003). Fundamental Characteristics of Thai Labour Law and the Direction of Reform. International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations, 19(3), 347–362.
Website
Sumikawa Law Office. (n.d.). Settling Labor Disputes in Japan. Retrieved October 18, 2021, from https://sumikawa.net/legal-services/how-do-you-settle-labor-disputes/
Yip, W. J. (2020). Labour Court v Industrial Court. https://www.legaltiam.com/post/labour-court-v-industrial-court
Website
Sumikawa Law Office. (n.d.). Settling Labor Disputes in Japan. Retrieved October 18, 2021, from https://sumikawa.net/legal-services/how-do-you-settle-labor-disputes/
Yip, W. J. (2020). Labour Court v Industrial Court. https://www.legaltiam.com/post/labour-court-v-industrial-court
Laws/ Regulations
The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia
Act of the Republic of Indonesia Number 48 Year 2009 Concerning Judiciary Power (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 157 of 2009, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5076)., (2009).
Act of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 Year 2004 Concerning Industrial Relations Dispute Settlement (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6 of 2004, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4356)., (2009).
Het Herzine Indonesisch Reglement.
Reglemant op de Burgelijk Rechtsvordering.
Reglment Buaitengewesten.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v24i3.23251
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 5 timesPDF - 9 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
