UNFAIR BUSINESS COMPETITION BY PT FORISA NUSAPERSADA AS A MARKET LEADER
Abstract
In the business world, business competition is a natural thing. Business actors conduct business competition to dominate the relevant market or achieve a dominant position. Mastery of a dominant position is allowed as long as it is achieved in one's own capacity and in an equitable manner. To achieve a dominant position in the market, it is not uncommon for business actors to use unjustified methods so that actions from prohibited business competition emerge. The purpose of this study is to determine the regulation of the dominant position in business competition law in Indonesia and to analyze indications of abuse of the dominant position by PT Forisa Nusapersada as containedinKPPU's Decision Number: 14/KPPU-L/2015which continues until the cassation as decided inSupreme Court Decision Number: 1106 K/Pdt.Sus-KPPU/2017.Through this research, it is concluded that the dominant position regulation in business competition law in Indonesia is contained inLaw Number 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition.In the case of PT Forisa Nusapersada,there are different indications of abuse of the dominant position which have led to different decisions between the KPPU and the Supreme Court.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
References
Indonesian. Supreme Court Decision Number: 1106 K/Pdt.Sus-KPPU/2017.
________. Decision of the Business Competition Supervisory Commission Number: 14/KPPU-L/2015.
KPPU. Guidelines for the Implementation of Article 25 concerning Abuse of Dominant Position Based on Law Number 5 Year 1999 concerning Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition.
Adnyana, IGN (2013). Legal Efforts for Objection in Handling Business Competition Cases. Legal Journal. Volume 18 Number 1.
Sjahdeini, Sautan Remi. (2000). Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition. Legal Journal. Volume 10 Number 1.
Simbolon, Petronella Alum. (2008). Business Competition Supervisory Commission in Enforcement of Business Competition Law. Legal Journal. Volume 20 Number 3.
Telaumbanua, Dalinama. (2012). The Concept of Abuse of Dominant Position in Business Competition Law. Thesis. Salatiga : Satya Wacana Christian University.
Prayoga, Ayuda D. (1999). Business Competition and the Laws That Govern It in Indonesia. Jakarta : Elliptical Project.
Sirait, Ningrum Natasya. (2003). The Role of the Judiciary in Handling Business Competition Cases. Jakarta: Partnership for Business Competition PBC.
Herman and K. Hansen. (2001). Law on Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition. Jakarta : Catalyst.
Hadjon, Philipus M. (2007). Legal Protection for the People in Indonesia. Surabaya : Science Development.
Lubis, Andi Fahmi et al. (2017). Competition Law Between Text and Context. Jakarta : Business Competition Supervisory Commission.
Maryanto. (2017). Business World, Business Competition, and KPPU's Functions. Semarang : Unissula Press.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. (2011). Legal Research, 11th Issue. Jakarta, Kencana.
Fajar, Mukti and Yulianto Achmad. (2010). Dualism of Normative & Empirical Legal Research, Yogyakarta, Pustaka Pelajar.
Ministry of Administrative Reform and Bureaucratic Reform (PANRB). (10 October 2019). Get to know the US Consumer Protection Agency and its Similarities to People's Online Aspiration and Complaint Service!”, https://www.menpan.go.id/site/berita-terkini/menkenal-badan-perlindungan-konsumen-as-dan-kesamaannya-dengan-lapor
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v24i3.26606
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 0 timesPDF - 0 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.








