DETERMINING A JUSTICE COLLABORATOR’S STATUS OF CORRUPTION: DISPARITIES CONSIDERATION OF INDONESIAN LAW ENFORCEMENT
Abstract
The absence of a comprehensive legal framework for determining justice collaborator status in Indonesia has resulted in adverse consequences, particularly in the realm of corruption law enforcement, leading to discrepancies in its implementation. The objective of this study is to examine the process of identifying justice collaborators in Indonesia and assess the existing disparities in this determination. The present study employs a normative research design, wherein the author employs a descriptive qualitative approach. The existing literature indicates that the management of justice collaborators involved in corruption offenses within Indonesia's criminal justice system is currently governed by several Indonesian statutes, namely Acts Number 7 of 2006, Number 5 of 2009, Number 31 of 2014, and Circular Letter of the Supreme Court Number 4 of 2011. The presence of difficulties in the implementation of protecting Justice collaborators and the reluctance of the perpetrators to collaborate with law enforcement is evident in the disparity observed in the determination of justice collaborators in a corruption case in Indonesia.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Journal Articles
Cahyadi, Irwan Adi. (2014). Kedudukan Hukum Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agungdalam Hukum Positif Di Indonesia. Kumpulan Jurnal Fakultas Hukum, Mei: 1-19.
Febriansyah. (2011). “Research Report: Strengthening the Eradication of Corruption Through the Coordination and Supervision Function of the Corruption Eradication Commission”.
Gultom, Laura Naomi Rotua. (2020). Studi Komparatif Antara Justice Collaborator Dengan Whistleblower Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Corruptio, 1 (2): 129-142.
Hafid, Zhulfiana Pratiwi. (2019). Justice Collaborator Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2014 Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban. Al-Qadau, 6 (1): 40-58.
Kaseger, Raymel B. (2017). “Perbuatan Merugikan Keuangan Negara Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 Tentang Perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi”, Lex Crimen, 4 (6): 14-22.
Krisnamurti, Hana. (2016). Kedudukan Saksi Anak Dalam Pembuktian Perkara Pidana. Wacana Paramarta, 15 (2): 1-11.
Mamahit, Coby E. (2016). Kajian Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung (Sema) Nomor 4 Tahun 2011 Tentang Saksi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Yang Bekerjasama (Justice Collaborator). Lex Crimen, 5 (6): 163-168.
Mareta, Josefhin. (2016). Analisis Kebijakan Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban. Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum, 10 (1): 106-120. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2016.V10.105-115.
Muhammad, Rusli. (2015). Pengaturan dan Urgensi Whistle Blower dan Justice Collaborator dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 2 (22): 203 – 222, https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol22.iss2.art2.
Werluka, Lorens. (2019). Alat Bukti Yang Sah Dalam Pembuktian Menurutundang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 Tentang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP). Jurnal Belo, 4 (2): 228-248.
Books
Jaya, Nyoman Serikat Putra. (2001). Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Lies Sulistiani, et. Al. Sudut Pandang Peran LPSK dalam Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban. Jakarta: Lembaga Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban.
Rahardjo, Satjipto. (2006). Membedah Hukum Progresif. Jakarta: Kompas.
Samosir, Djisman. (2013). Segenggam tentang hukum acara pidana, Bandung: Nuansa Indah.
Wahyono, Padmo. (1986). Indonesia Negara Berdasarkan Atas Hukum. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Wijaya, Firman. (2012). Whistle Blower dan Justice Collaborator dalam Perspektif Hukum. Jakarta: Penaku.
Internet
Kabar.24, “KPK Tolak Permohonan Justice Collaborator Wahyu Setiawan”, https://kabar24.bisnis.com/read/20200803/16/1274399/ kpk-tolak-permohonan-justice-collaborator-wahyu-setiawan, accessed on January 13, 2021.
Kompas.com, “KPK Tolak Permohonan Justice Collaborator Musa Zainuddin”, https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2019/11/28/ 21493671/kpk-tolak-permohonan-justice-collaborator-musa-zainuddin, accessed on January 13, 2021.
Surastini Fitriasih, “Perlindungan Saksi Dan Korban Sebagai Sarana Menuju Proses Peradilan (Pidana) Yang Jujur Dan Adil”, Sumber: http://pemantauperadilan.org/perlindungan-saksi-dan-korban-surastini-fitriasih, diakses pada tanggal 13 Januari 2021.
Tirto.id, “KPK Ajukan Kasasi Demi Status Justice Collaborator Andi Narogong”, https://tirto.id/kpk-ajukan-kasasi-demi-status-justice-collaborator-andi-narogong-cJ5E, accessed on January 13, 2021.
Regulation
Constitutional Court Decision Number 90/PUU-XVI/2018 dated January 30, 2019.
Government Regulation No. 99 of 2012 concerning the Second Amendment to Government Regulation No. 32 of 1999 concerning Terms and Procedures for the Implementation of the Rights of Correctional Inmates.
Law no. 13 of 2006 in conjunction with Law no. 31 Year 2014
Law No. 5 of 2009 concerning the United Nations Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime.
Law No. 7 of 2006 concerning the United Nations Convention Against Corruption.
Law Number 13 of 2006 concerning Protection of Witnesses and Victims.
Supreme Court Circular (SEMA) Number 4 of 2011 concerning the Treatment Of Criminal Whistle Blowers and Justice collaborators in Certain Criminal Cases.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v25i1.28659
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 0 timesPDF - 0 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
