INTERPRETATION OF THE POSITION OF THE CORRUPTION ERADICATION COMMISSION AS AN EXECUTIVE AGENCY

Jauhar Nashrullah

Abstract


The shift in the institutional position of the KPK (Corruption Eradication Commission) as an executive agency has brought various discourses and pros and cons in the community. This research aims to contribute to the field of thought by interpreting the institutional position of the KPK in Indonesia from the perspective of the six modalities of constitutional argument theory. This research uses normative juridical research methods with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Through in-depth analysis of all legal materials (primary and secondary), the research results provide an understanding that through textual, historical, structural, doctrinal, ethical, and prudential interpretations, it is concluded that the actual institutional change of the KPK to the executive is not unconstitutional. However, designing the KPK institution should not only be based on textual provisions and originality of authority, it is necessary to explore constitutional morality and ethics. Moreover, if analyzed in historical, doctrinal, moral, prudential, and ethical aspects, the KPK is more appropriately designed as an independent state commission. KPK bears tremendous responsibility and hopes to eradicate corruption, which has hindered achieving the nation's goals. Therefore, the independence of the KPK needs to be safeguarded from the intervention of other powers.


Keywords


Corruption; Corruption Eradication Commission; Constitutional Interpretation.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Journal Article

Ari Abdillah, Muhamad, Seli Harahab, dan Siti Nurani. “Kedudukan Kpk Sebagai Lembaga Negara Dalam Persfektif Konsep Trias Politica.” Jurnal Rechten : Riset Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia 2, no. 1 (2019): 8–13.

Asyikin, Nehru, dan Adam Setiawan. “Kedudukan KPK dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Pasca Diterbitkannya Revisi Undang-Undang KPK.” Justitia Jurnal Hukum Volume 4, no. 1 (2020): 126–147.

Baskoro, Bambang Dwi. “Perseteruan KPK Dengan Polri Dalam Upaya Pemberantasan Korupsi.” Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Hukum 43, no. 2 (2013).

Bhaskara, I G A, dan K P Sudibya. “Politik Hukum Revisi Undang-Undang Kpk Yang Tidak Termuat Dalam Prolegnas Prioritas Tahun 2019.” Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum 10, no. 2 (2022): 434–444.

Chandranegara, Ibnu Sina. “Pengadopsian Mekanisme Fast-Track Legislation dalam Pengusulan Rancangan Undang-Undang oleh Presiden.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 21, no. 1 (2021): 123.

Falah Parama, Jovial, dan Sholahuddin Al-Fatih. “Kajian Yuridis Ambivalensi Pergeseran Independensi Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK) Ke Dalam Rumpun Lembaga Eksekutif.” Journal Komunitas Yustisia Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Program Studi Ilmu Hukum 4, no. 1 (2021): 57–65.

Haryono, Dodi. “Metode Tafsir Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Pengujian Konstitusional Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja.” Jurnal Konstitusi 18, no. 4 (2022): 774.

Iskandar, Bakri. “Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 36/PUU-XV/2017 Tentang Hak Angket Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Terhadap Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi.” Jurnal Lex Renaissance 4, no. 2 (2019): 410–431.

Kurnia, Titon Slamet. “Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi sebagai Tata Konstitusional Abnormal dan Implikasi Yuridis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 36/PUU-XV/2017.” Jurnal Konstitusi 17, no. 1 (2020): 130.

Lailam, Tanto. “Membangun Constitutional Morality Hakim Konstitusi di Indonesia.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 20, no. 4 (2020): 511.

Mochtar, Zainal Arifin. “The Independence of the Corruption Eradication Commission Post-Law Number 19 of 2019.” Jurnal Konstitusi 18, no. 2 (2021): 345.

Nada, Izzah Qotrun. “Kedudukan Lembaga Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (Kpk) Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia (Telaah Yuridis Normatif Putusan Mk).” Constitution Journal 1, no. 1 (2022): 61–78.

Pinilih, Sekar Anggun Gading. “Politik Hukum Kedudukan Kpk Sebagai Lembaga Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Progresif 8, no. 1 (2020): 15–27.

Ramadhana, Kurnia. “Menyoal Kinerja KPK: Antara Harapan dan Pencapaian.” Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi 5, no. 2 (2019): 151–163.

Books

Bobbit, Philip. Constitutional Fate: Theory of the Constitution. New Yor: Oxford University Press, 1982.

Budi SP, Johan, Priharsa Nugraha, Faisal, Muadz D’Fahmi, Teja Hendra, Djoni Setyo Tamtomo, Adhi Suratno, Sari Wardhani, Khaidir Ramli, dan Supadi. Menyalakan Lilin di Tengah Kegelapan. Jakarta: KPK (Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi), 2007.

Kusuma, A. B. Lahirnya Undang-Undang Dasar 1945. II. Depok: Badan Penerbit Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2009.

Rishan, Idul. Hukum & Politik Ketatanegaraan. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press, 2020.

Newspaper Article

Rishan, Idul. “Ketika KPK Berada Dibawah Kuasa Presiden.” Koran Tempo. Yogyakarta, November 5, 2019.

Internet Resources

Rifki. (2019, Mei 22). Makar dan People Power dalam Perspektif Hukum Indonesia. Retrieved Mei 24, 2019, from AcehTrend: https://www.acehtrend.com/2019/05/22/makar-dan-people-power-dalam-perspektif-hukum-indonesia/




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v25i1.32739

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
P-ISSN 0854-5499
E-ISSN 2527-8428
Published by Faculty of Law, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia