RECONSTRUCTION OF THE REGULATION GOVERNING AD HOC JUDGES IN THE INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COURT OF INDONESIA

Yogo Pamungkas, Amriyati Amriyati, Andari Yurikosari, Anda Setiawati, Ribka Yonathan Lie

Abstract


This article examines the current construction of ad hoc judges within the Industrial Relations Court (PHI) and the resulting challenges impacting the settlement of industrial relations disputes. The primary objective of this analysis is to identify the legal problems associated with the present framework regulating ad hoc PHI judges and to propose solutions that mitigate these weaknesses. Utilizing a normative qualitative research methodology, this study relies on secondary data, employing both a statutory and conceptual approach to comprehension. Findings suggest that the existing construction of ad hoc PHI judges may compromise the objectivity of their decisions. This potential for bias can adversely affect fair conflict resolution, undermining trust in the judicial process. In light of these findings, the article advocates for a comprehensive reconstruction of the regulatory framework governing ad hoc judges. This would involve legislative reforms aimed at enhancing the performance and quality of PHI ad hoc judges. Such reforms could include stricter selection criteria, ongoing training programs, and mechanisms for accountability to ensure that these judges can make impartial and informed decisions. Ultimately, by addressing the identified legal shortcomings and implementing the proposed solutions, the integrity of the industrial relations dispute resolution process can be significantly improved. This approach not only aims to safeguard justice and fairness in industrial relations but also enhances the overall efficacy of the legal system in Indonesia. The insights  underscore the urgent need for legislative action to foster a robust and unbiased framework for ad hoc PHI judges, ensuring equitable outcomes for all parties involved in industrial disputes.


Keywords


Ad hoc judge; Court;industrial relation; Reconstruction, Indonesia

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abi-Hassan, Sahar, Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier, Dino P. Christenson, Aaron R. Kaufman, and Brian Libgober. “The Ideologies of Organized Interests and Amicus Curiae Briefs: Large-Scale, Social Network Imputation of Ideal Points.” Political Analysis 31, no. 3 (July 26, 2023): 396–413. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2022.34.

Adelia, Kiki, and Andri Kurniawan. “Permasalahan Rekrutmen Hakim Ad-Hoc Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial.” Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Bidang Hukum Kenegaraan 4, no. 1 (2020): 56–63. https://jim.usk.ac.id/kenegaraan/article/view/17944.

Ansori, Lutfil. “Reformasi Penegakan Hukum Perspektif Hukum Progresif.” Jurnal Yuridis 4, no. 2 (January 11, 2018): 148–63. https://doi.org/10.35586/.v4i2.244.

Appleby, Gabrielle, and Alysia Blackham. “The Shadow Of The Court: The Growing Imperative To Reform Ethical Regulation Of Former Judges.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 67, no. 3 (July 28, 2018): 505–46. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589318000143.

Artadi, Ibnu. “Hukum: Antara Nilai-Nilai Kepastian, Kemanfaatan Dan Keadilan.” Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dan Dinamika Masyarakat 4, no. 1 (2006): 67–80. https://jurnal.untagsmg.ac.id/index.php/hdm/article/view/362/415.

Benuf, Kornelius, and Muhamad Azhar. “Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Sebagai Instrumen Mengurai Permasalahan Hukum Kontemporer.” Gema Keadilan 7, no. 1 (April 1, 2020): 20–33. https://doi.org/10.14710/gk.2020.7504.

Berita Kota News. “Forum Solidaritas Hakim Adhoc Tipikor & PHI Desak Revisi Pepres 5 Tahun 2013.” Beritakotanews. Com, 2024. https://beritakotanews.id/forum-solidaritas-hakim-adhoc-tipikor-phi-desak-revisi-pepres-5-tahun-2013/.

Corby, Susan, Pete Burgess, Armin Höland, Hélène Michel, and Laurent Willemez. “Lay and Professional Judges in Europe’s Labour Courts: Does the Professional Judge Dominate?” Industrial Law Journal 49, no. 2 (April 30, 2020): 231–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwz012.

Djojorahardjo, Rommy Haryono. “Mewujudkan Aspek Keadilan Dalam Putusan Hakim Di Peradilan Perdata.” Jurnal Media Hukum Dan Peradilan, 2019, 88–100. https://repository.ubaya.ac.id/35512/1/Rommy%20Haryono%20Djojorahardjo_MEWUJUDKAN%20ASPEK%20KEADILAN%20DALAM%20PUTUSAN%20HAKIM.pdf.

Handayani, Handayani, Johannes Satya Pirma, and Kiki Kiki. “Peranan Filsafat Hukum Dalam Mewujudkan Keadilan.” Jurnal Muara Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, Dan Seni 2, no. 2 (October 17, 2018): 720–25. https://doi.org/10.24912/jmishumsen.v2i2.2572.

Harianstar. “Oknum Hakim Ad Hoc PHI PN Medan Dilaporkan Dugaan Suap Ke KY.” Harianstar.Com, 2024. https://harianstar.com/hukum/oknum-hakim-ad-hoc-phi-pn-medan-dilaporkan-dugaan-suap-ke-ky/.

Helmi, Muhammad Ishar, and Riko Hendra Pilo. “Independensi Hakim Ad-Hoc Pada Lingkungan Peradilan Hubungan Industrial.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 6, no. 2 (July 31, 2017): 233–58. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.6.2.2017.233-258.

Huda, Nurul. “Kasus Hakim Imas Dianasari - Diskriminasi Gaji Jadi Persoalan Utama.” Indonesia Corruption Watch, 2011. https://antikorupsi.org/id/article/kasus-hakim-imas-dianasari-diskriminasi-gaji-jadi-persoalan-utama.

Kasra, Helwan. “Kritik Terhadap Sistem Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial Di Indonesia : Studi UU No 2 Tahun 2004 Tentang Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial Perspektif Teori Sistem Hukum.” SOL JUSTICIA 5, no. 1 (June 30, 2022): 97–112. https://doi.org/10.54816/sj.v5i1.484.

Manullang, E. Fernando M. Legisme, Legalitas Dan Kepastian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana , 2017.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum . 13th ed. Jakarta : Kencana Prenada Media Group , 2017.

Mashari. “Membangun Sistem Peradilan Hubungan Industrial Yang Berwibawa.” Jurnal Ilmiah Dunia Hukum 1, no. 1 (2016): 113–30. https://jurnal.untagsmg.ac.id/index.php/duniahukum/article/view/611.

Nurdin Ismail. Etika Pemerintahan: Norma, Konsep, Dan Praktek Bagi Penyelenggara Pemerintahan. Yogyakarta: Lintang Rasi Aksara Books, 2017.

Rumadan, Ismail. “Peran Lembaga Peradilan Sebagai Institusi Penegak Hukum Dalam Menegakkan Keadilan Bagi Terwujudnya Perdamaian.” Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional 6, no. 1 (May 29, 2017): 69–87. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v6i1.128.

Rumambi, Maya J. R. “Kedudukan Hakim Ad Hoc Dalam Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2004.” Lex et Societatis 3, no. 2 (2015): 88–102. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexetsocietatis/article/view/7318.

Septiansyah, Zainal B., and Muhammad Ghalib. “Konsepsi Utilitarianisme Dalam Filsafat Hukum Dan Implementasinya Di Indonesia.” Ijtihad 34, no. 1 (April 4, 2019): 27–34. https://doi.org/10.15548/ijt.v34i1.3.

Sherly, Sherly Ayuna Putri, Agus Mulya Karsona, and Revi Inayatillah. “Pembaharuan Penyelesaian Perselisihan Ketenagakerjaan Di Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Berdasarkan Asas Sederhana, Cepat Dan Biaya Murah Sebagai Upaya Perwujudan Kepastian Hukum.” Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum 5, no. 2 (March 31, 2021): 310–27. https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v5i2.307.

Suhandi. “Karakteristik Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial Melalui Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial.” Perspektif: Kajian Masalah Hukum Dan Pembangunan 22, no. 1 (2017): 80–98. https://www.neliti.com/publications/527542/karakteristik-penyelesaian-perselisihan-hubungan-industrial-melalui-pengadilan-h.

Supono. “Asas Imparsialitas Hakim Adhoc Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial (Phi) Dalam Putusan Yang Objektif Dan Adil.” UNPAS BANDUNG , 2019. http://repository.unpas.ac.id/45330/.

Syamsudin, M. “Keadilan Prosedural Dan Substantif Dalam Putusan Sengketa Tanah Magersari.” Jurnal Yudisial 7, no. 1 (2014): 18–33. https://jurnal.komisiyudisial.go.id/index.php/jy/article/view/91.

Syarifuddin, Muhammad. “Legal Heuristic Approach in Judicial Practice.” Lex Publica 8, no. 2 (July 30, 2021): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.58829/lp.8.2.2021.1-13.

Tan, David. “Metode Penelitian Hukum: Mengupas Dan Mengulas Metodologi Dalam Menyelenggarakan Penelitian Hukum.” NUSANTARA: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial 8, no. 8 (2021): 2463–78. http://jurnal.um-tapsel.ac.id/index.php/nusantara/article/view/5601/0.

Tarigan, Andi. Tumpuan Keadilan Rawls. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2018.

Thedjakusuma, Helen Levana, and Christina NM Tobing. “Analisis Sikap Independen Dan Imparsial Hakim Ad-Hoc Dalam Menangani Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial.” Law Pro Justitia 6, no. 1 (2020): 73–85. https://ejournal-medan.uph.edu/lpj/article/view/625.

Wantu, Fence M. “Kendala Hakim Dalam Menciptakan Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan, Dan Kemanfaatan Di Peradilan Perdata.” Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada 25, no. 2 (March 29, 2014): 205. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16092.

Wijayanta, Tata Wijayanta, and Ari Hernawan. “Studi Evaluatif Peran Hakim Ad Hoc Dalam Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial Di Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Yogyakarta.” Yustisia Jurnal Hukum 3, no. 1 (January 1, 2014): 5–15. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v3i1.10102.

Yani, Ahmad. “Sistem Pemerintahan Indonesia: Pendekatan Teori Dan Praktek Konstitusi Undang-Undang Dasar 1945.” Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum 12, no. 2 (2018): 119–35. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/268381418.pdf.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v26i3.41749

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
P-ISSN 0854-5499
E-ISSN 2527-8428
Published by Faculty of Law, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia