Disparitas Penjatuhan Pidana Kurungan Pengganti Pidana Denda dalam Putusan Kasus Narkotika
Abstract
Disparity of Custody Punishment as Fine Replacement in Narcotic Court Decision ABSTRACT: Disparity of punishment as fine replacement is based on judge freedom in making a decision, minimum and maximum punishment in Narcotic Act, a change of the Act, the incorrectness of legal basis toward the punishment and lack of attention in the decision draft. The reasons for determining the amount of fine is based on judge consideration on not being paid of the payment that has been decided due to economic reason that is low, lenient and heavy sentences and the amount of evidences used by the accused, age, and the different occupation.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adami Chazawi, 2010, Pelajaran Hukum Pidana I, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.
Dwidja Priyanto, 2006, Sistem Pelaksanaan Pidana Penjara di Indonesia, PT. Refika Aditama, Bandung.
PAF. Lamintang, 1984, Hukum Penitensir Indonesia, Amrico, Bandung.
Muladi, Barda Nawawi Arief, 1998, Teori-Teori dan Kebijakan Pidana, Alumni, Bandung.
R. Soesilo, 1976, Kitab Undang Undang Hukum Pidana Sera Komentar-Komentarnya Lengkap Pasal Demi Pasal, Politea, Bogor.
Soerjono Soekanto, Sri Mamudji, 1985, Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Rajawali Press, Jakarta.
Sudarto, 1986, Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana,Alumni, Bandung.
Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Kitab Undang Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP).
Kitab Undang Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP).
Rancangan Kitab Undang Undang Hukum Pidana (RKUHP).
Undang Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 1997 tentang Nakotika.
Undang Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika.
Undang Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 0 timesPDF - 0 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.








