High and low achievers’ dominant learning style preferences in learning English
Abstract
This study aims at finding the high and low achievers’ learning style preferences and the teachers’ understanding about the students’ learning style preferences in learning English at MAN 1 Banda Aceh. The survey of this study used a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods. A questionnaire was used to explore the students’ learning style preferences, while an interview was used to get specific information about the teachers’ opinions on students’ learning style preferences in learning English. Willing (1988) category of learning style that consists of communicative, concrete, authority-oriented and analytical learning styles were used. The result of the questionnaire showed that the high achievers’ dominant learning style was the communicative one with a mean value of 3.12 and a standard deviation of 0.65. At the same time, the low achievers also favoured communicative learning style with a mean value of 3.11 and a standard deviation of 0.63. While the interview shows that the teachers were aware and understood well about students’ learning style preferences in learning English. In conclusion, by understanding their characteristics in absorbing information, the students can develop the skills in various ways to make it easier, faster and more successful for them in their learning.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alam, M. (2017). A study on cadets’ EFL learning styles preferences: The case of Sylhet cadet college. International Journal of English Language and Linguistics Research, 5(1), 58-71.
Allen, K., Scheve, J., & Nieter, V. (2011). Understanding learning styles. Huntington Beach: Shell Educational Publishing, Inc.
Awla, H. A. (2014). Learning styles and their relation to teaching styles. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 2(3), 241-245.
Bidabadi, F. S., & Yamat, S. (2010). Learning style preferences by Iranian EFL freshman university students. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7, 219–226.
Dağ, F., & Geçer, A. (2009). Relations between online learning and learning styles. Journal of Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 862-871.
Deka, U. (1993). Factors of academic achievement. New Delhi: Northern Book Centre.
Felder, R. M. (1996). Matters of style. AEEE Prism, 6(4), 18-23.
Fleming, N. D. (2001). Teaching and learning styles: VARK strategies. Christchurch: Author.
Gilakjani, A. P., & Ahmadi, S. M. (2011). The effect of visual, auditory, and kinaesthetic learning styles on language teaching. International Conference on Social Science and Humanity, 5, 496-472.
Gorham, J. (2002). Student’s perception of teacher behaviours as motivating and demotivating factors in college classes. Journal of Communication Quarterly, 40(3), 58-77.
Grasha, A. F., & Yangarber-Hicks, N. (2000). Integrating teaching styles and learning styles with instructional technology. College Teaching, 48(1), 2-11.
Jabeen, S., & Khan, M. A. (2013). A study on need achievement of high and low achievers. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(4), 225-235.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nunan, D. (1999). Second language teaching and learning. Boston: Heinle and Heinle.
Pariafsai, A., Ghazanfari, M., Akbari, O., & Borabadi, T. H. (2015). High-School students’ dominant learning styles preferences in learning English: How are “Good Language Learners” different from the ordinary ones? Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 7(16), 85-111.
Peacock, M. (2001). Match or mismatch? Learning styles and teaching styles in EFL. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(1), 1-20.
Reid, J. M. (1987). The learning style preferences of ESL students. TESOL Quarterly, 21(1), 87-111.
Schmitt, N. (2002). An introduction to applied linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.
Tuan, L. T. (2011). Matching and stretching learners’ learning styles. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(2), 285-294.
Willing, K. (1988). Learning styles in adult migrant Education. Adelaide: National Curriculum Resource Centre.
Willson, J. (1999). High and low achievers’ classroom interaction patterns in an upper primary classroom. Paper presented at the AARE Conference, Melbourne, Australia.
Wong, L. L. C., & Nunan, D. (2011). The learning styles and strategies of effective language learners. System, 39(2), 144-163.
Xu, W. (2011). Learning styles and their implications in learning and teaching. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(4), 413-416.
Zohar, A., Degani, A., & Vaaknin, E. (2001). Teachers’ beliefs about low achieving students and higher order thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(4), 459-485.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/eej.v12i2.19152
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 0 timesPDF - 0 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
P-ISSN: 2085-3750
E-ISSN: 3025-9789
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

