The use of point counterpoint strategy in teaching EFL students’ writing skill at Madrasah Aliyah Negeri (MAN) 5 Bireun

Abdullah Abdullah, Usman Kasim, Saiful Marhaban

Abstract


This study aimed to find out the use of point-counterpoint strategy to improve students’ writing skills on discussion text for the second-grade students of Madrasah Aliyah Negeri (MAN) 5 Bireuen. This research used a quantitative method. The research subjects were 42 students from XI MIPA 1 and  MIPA 2. Class XI MIPA 1 was an experimental group and Class XI MIPA 2 was a control group. Both classes were selected for students’ equal ability. The instruments used to collect the data were tests; pretest and posttest and questionnaire. The writing test was used for pretest and post-test. The data collected were analyzed using descriptive statistic to find the mean scores of the two classes. The mean score of the pretest in the experimental class was 63.61 and the mean score of the posttest in the experimental class was 77. Meanwhile, the mean score of the pretest in the control class was 63.80 and the mean score of the posttest in the control class was 74.47. The  mean score of the experimental class was higher than the control class. Accordingly, the hypothesis of this research was accepted. In the questionnaire, the researchers found that almost all students choose “agree” toward the Point-Counterpoint strategy in writing discussion text.


Keywords


discussion text; point-counterpoint strategy; writing skill.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Brown, H. D. (2000). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy, 2nd ed. New York: Longman.

Brown, H. D. (2003). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. London: Blackwell Publishers.

Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching. Harlow: Pearson Longman.

Feez, S. (1998). Text-based syllabus design. Sydney: Macquarie University.

Heaton, J. B. (1988). Writing English language tests. London: Longman Group UK Ltd.

Hogue, A. (2008). First steps in academic writing (2nd ed.). London: Pearson Education, Inc.

Hudson, D. L. (2004). Rights of students (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Chelsea House Publishers.

Jaramillo, M. (2011). Adolescents awareness of environmental care: Experiences when writing short descriptive texts in English. PROFILE, 13(1), 11-30.

Negari, G. M. (2011). A study on strategy instruction and EFL learners’ writing skills. International Journal of English Linguistics, 1(2), 299-307.

Nunan, D. (2015). Practical English language teaching. Singapore: Mc grow-hill company.

Nyasimi, N. B. (2014). Challenges students face in learning essay writing skills in the English language in secondary schools in Manga district, Nyamira county, Kenya. ( Unpublished master’s thesis). Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya.

Paltridge, B. (1996). Genre, text type, and the language learning classroom. ELT Journal, 50(3), 237-243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/50.3.237

Pelton, R. P. (2010). Action research for teacher candidates: Using classroom data to enhance instruction. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Education.

Sejnost, R. L., & Thiese, S. M. (2010). Building content literacy: Srategies for the adolescent learner. California: Corwin Press.

Seow, A. (2002). The writing process and process writing. In J. C. Richards & W. A. Renandya (Ed.), Methodology in language teaching an anthology of current practice (pp. 315-320). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Silberman, M. S. (2010). Active learning 101 cara belajar siswa aktif [Active learning 101 ways of active learning for students]. Bandung: Nusamedia.

Weigle, S. C. (2002). Assessing writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Yunita, U. (2014). Improving Students’ Writing Skill by Using Point Counter Point strategy at The Tenth Grade of MA Darul Huda Ponorogo in The 2013/2014 Academic Year (Unpublished undergraduate dissertation). Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo, Ponorogo, Indonesia.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/eej.v12i3.19275

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

P-ISSN: 2085-3750

E-ISSN: 3025-9789 

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.