An exploration of students’ engagement in EFL classrooms

Ivana Sambara Barus, Fadlia Fadlia, Merina Devira

Abstract


The purpose of this research was to explore students' behavioral engagement in the classroom and the factors that affect it. This research was approached using an explorative descriptive qualitative study., involving teachers and students in two classes at the first grade of a senior high school in Langsa, Indonesia. The classes were taught by two English teachers, and 57 students were involved. The instruments used in this research were observations, questionnaires and focus group discussions with teachers and students. The results of this study indicate that most students paid serious attention to the lesson, put their best effort to focus on the teaching and learning process, and complete assignments. In addition, the students were active in asking questions, giving opinions, and participating in group discussion. The results of this study also show that the most dominant factor in influencing students 'engagement was the teachers' support factor, followed by class structure and school level factors. Therefore, it is suggested that English teachers and school provide best support to students, and they establish good class structure in terms of class size and situation to improve students’ engagement.

Keywords


EFL classrooms; learning process; student behavior; student engagement

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdullah, M. Y., Bakar, N. R. A., & Mahbob, M. H. (2012). The dynamics of student participation in classroom: Observation on level and forms of participation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.246.

Anita, F., & Susilawati, L. (2018). Keterlibatan peserta didik dalam pembelajaran bahasa Inggris melalui Project-based Language Learning (PBLL) [The involvement of students in English lesson through Project-Based Language Learning (PBLL)]. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa, 7(2), 428-435. https://doi.org/10.31571/bahasa.v7i2.1023

Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In M. R. Gunnar & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), Self processes and development (pp. 43–77). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Conner, T. (2016). Relationships: The key to student engagement. International Journal of Educational and Learning, 5(1), 13-22. https://doi.org/10.14257/ijel.2016.5.1.02

Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059

Gherasim, L. R., Butnaru, S., & Lacob, L. (2011). The motivation, learning environment and school achievement. The International Journal of Learning Annual Review, 17(12), 353-364

Guthrie, J. T., & Anderson, E. (1999). Engagement in reading: Processes of motivated, strategic, knowledgeable, social readers. In J. T. Guthrie & D. E. Alvermann (Eds.), Engaged reading: Processes, practices, and policy implications (pp. 17-45). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Handelsman, M. M., Briggs, W. L., Sullivan, N., & Towler, A. (2005). A measure of college student course engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 98(3), 184-192. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.98.3.184-192

Lim, H. Y. (2003). Successful classroom discussions with adult Korean ESL/EFL learners. The Internet TESL Journal, 9(5). http://iteslj.org/Technique/Lim-AdultKoreanshtml

MacKenzie, A. (2015). Promoting student engagement in the English as a foreign language classroom in a Japanese university. Journal of Business Administration, 86, 129-143. https://researchmap.jp/g0000209037/published_papers/13956839

Newmann, F. (1981). Reducing student alienation in high schools: Implications of theory. Harvard Educational Review, 51(4), 546-564.

Newmann, F. M., Wehlage, G. G., & Lamborn, S. D. (1992). The significance and sources of student engagement. In F. M. Newmann (Ed.), Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools (pp. 11 – 39). New York: Teachers College Press.

Nguyen, T. D., Cannata, M., & Miller, J. (2016). Understanding student behavioral engagement: Importance of student interaction with peers and teachers. The Journal of Educational Research, 111(2), 163-174, https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2016.1220359

Rahayu, A. S. (2018). Engaging the students with styles in EFL perspectives. Celtic: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching, Literature and Linguistics, 3(1), 15-29. https://doi.org/10.22219/celtic.v3i1.7856

Reyes, M. R., Brackett, M. A., Rivers, S. E., White, M., & Salovey, P. (2012). Classroom emotional climate, student engagement, and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 700–712. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027268

Russell, B., & Slater, G. R. (2011). Factors that encourage student engagement: Insights from a case study of ‘first time’ students in a New Zealand University. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 8(1), 81-96. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.8.1.7

Setiawan, A., Munir, A., & Suhartono. (2019). Students’ engagement in EFL class through creative teaching. Journal Education and Development, 7(3), 26-30. https://doi.org/10.37081/ed.v7i3.1143

Skinner, E. A., & Blemont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571-581. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.571

Sugiyono. (2015). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D [Educational research methods: Quantitative, qualitative, and developmental research approaches]. Bandung. Alfabeta.

Taylor, L., & Parson, J. (2011). Improving student engagement. Current Issues in Education, 14(1), 1-33.

Umbach, P. D., & Wawrzynski, M. R. (2005). Faculty do matter: The role of college faculty in student learning and engagement. Research in Higher Education. 46(2), 84-153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-004-1598-1

Zepke, N., & Leach, L. (2010). Improving student engagement: Ten proposals for action. Active Learning in Higher Education, 11(3), 167-177. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787410379680




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/eej.v13i2.25969

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

P-ISSN: 2085-3750

E-ISSN: 3025-9789 

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.