Identification of Formal-Post Formal Reasoning Prospective Biology Teachers on Three Aspects of Courses

Aa Juhanda*, Nuryani Y. Rustaman, Topik Hidayat, Ana Ratna Wulan

Abstract


This descriptive study aims to determine the reasoning of the formal-post formal operations of biology teacher candidates in three aspects of lectures. The research sample consisted of 76 students who took part in the 2019/2020 academic year lectures which were taken using the purposive technique. The sample consisted of 29 students in the General Biology practicum subject, 24 students in the invertebrates practicum subject, and 23 students in the vertebrate zoology practicum subject. The data was collected through a test technique using formal-post-formal operational reasoning questions that were developed by themselves and had met the constructive and empirical valid criteria. Data analysis regarding the level of formal-post formal operational reasoning was carried out using the percentage correct score technique obtained for each item so that the correct score was obtained from all students. The results showed that there was a difference in the percentage level of formal-post formal operational reasoning for each level of student lectures. The highest to the lowest level of reasoning was obtained by students who took the vertebrates zoology practicum course by 67%, invertebrates zoology practicum by 67%, and general biology practicum by 17%. Also, students' formal operational reasoning in each subject tends to be lower when compared to their post-formal operational reasoning. The most common indicators of formal reasoning among the three aspects of the lecture are proportional reasoning, and indicators that are lacking are probabilistic and correlational.


Keywords


Formal-Post Formal Operational Reasoning, Biology Teacher Candidate Students

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arikunto, S. 2013. Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Adriani, M., Hidayat, T., & Rahmat, A. 2015. Kemampuan Penalaran Siswa SMA pada Pembelajaran Klasifikasi Tumbuhan dengan dan Tanpa Praktikum Virtual. Conference: Seminar Nasional XII Pendidikan Biologi FKIP UNS 2015, p.281-284.

Commons, M. L. & Richards, F. A. 2016. Systematic and metasystenatic reasoning: a case for levels of reasoning beyond piaget’s stage of formal operation. Child Development, 53(4):1058-1069.

Commons, M.L. 2008. Introduction to the model of hierarchical complexity and its relationship to postformal action. World Future, 64(5-7):305-320.

Commons, M.L., Richards, F.A., & Kuhn, D. 1982. Systematic and metasystematic reasoning: a case for levels of reasoning beyond piaget's stage of formal operations. Child Development, 53(4):1058-1069.

Dahar, R.W. 2011. Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta : Penerbit. Erlangga.

Ermiyanti, Rustaman, N.Y., & Rahmat, A. 2016. Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Logis dengan Pembelajaran Anatomi Tumbuhan Berbasis Framing. Prosiding SNIPS 2016, p.291-295.

Hokayem, H. 2016. Patterns of reasoning about ecological systemic reasoning for early elementary students. Science Education International. 27(1):117-135.

Hooda, M. & Devi, A. 2018. Strategies For Developing Reasoning Ability Among Students. Tersedia: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327281314_strategies_for_ developing_reasoning_ability_among_students. (01 Maret 2021).

Juhanda, A., Rustaman, N.Y., Hidayat, T., & Wulan, A.R. 2019. The profile of logical thinking biology prospective teachers. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157 (2):022114,1-4.

Lawson, A. E. 1979. “Science Education Information Report”. The Ohio State University College of Education 1200 Chamber Road, 3rd Flr. Columbus Ohio 43212

________. 2000. Development and validation of the classroom test of formal reasoning: Revised Edition. Arizona State University.

Martinez, M.E. 2000. Education as the cultivation of intelligence. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Meilinda. 2018. Program Perkuliahan Perubahan Iklim dengan Model Pembelajaran Yoyo System Based Case Untuk Meningkatkan Penguasaan Konsep dan Keterampilan Berpikir Sistem Mahasiswa. Disertasi Program Studi Pendidikan IPA SPs UPI Bandung: tidak diterbitkan.

Muis, A., Gasing, A.B., & Arifin, A.N. 2016. Investigasi persiapan dan pelaksanaan perkuliahan biologi dasar. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Insani, 19(1):1-9.

Murni, D. 2016. Hubungan Kemampuan Berpikir Logis Dengan Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa Pada Mata Kuliah Genetika. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 7(2):47-51.

Nickerson, R.S. 1985. The Teaching Of Thinking. New Jersey: Lawrence.

____________ . (2004). Teaching reasoning. In J.P. Leighton & R.J. Sternberg (Eds.). The nature of reasoning. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Nur, M. 1991. Pengadaptasian Test of Logikal Thinking (TOLT) dalam Setting Indonesia. Surabaya: IKIP Surabaya.

Nuraini, Subiki, & Supriadi, B. 2018. Identifikasi Kemampuan Penalaran Ilmiah (Scientific Reasoning) Siswa SMA Di Kabupaten Jember Pada Pokok Bahasan Dinamika. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Fisika 2018 “Implementasi Pendidikan Karakter dan IPTEK untuk Generasi Millenial Indonesia Menuju SDGs 2030“, Maret, p.121-126.

Piaget, J. 1964. Cognitive development in children: development and learning. Journal of Research in Sciences Teaching, 2:176-186.

Sutarno. 2014. Profil penalaran ilmiah mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika Universitas Bengkulu tahun akademik 2013/2014. Prosiding Seminar Nasional dan Rapat Tahunan Bidang MIPA, 2014 Mei, p.361-371.

Tairab, H.H. 2016. Assessing students’ understanding of control of variables across three grade levels and gender. International Education Studies, 9(1):44-54.

Tawil, M. 2008. Pengaruh kemampuan penalaran formal terhadap hasil belajar fisika siswa kelas II SLTP Negeri 1 Sungguminasa Kabupaten Gowa. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 14(75):1047-1068.

Thahir, A. 2018. Psikologi Perkembangan. www.aura-publishing.com.

Trifone, J.D. 1987. The test of logical thinking. The American Biology Teacher, 49(8):411-416.

Valanides, N. 1996. Formal reasoning and science teaching. School Science and Mathematics, 96(2):99-107.

Zulfaidhah, Z., Palenewen, E., & Hardoko, A. 2018. Needs analysis in the problem based learning (pbl) model tools and problems regarding 7th grade students' science learning outcome at SMPN 2 Bongan. Biodik, 4(1):48-59.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/jipi.v5i1.19708

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 JIPI (Jurnal IPA & Pembelajaran IPA)



JIPI (Jurnal IPA dan Pembelajaran IPA)

ISSN 2614-0500  (print) | 2620-553X (online)
Organized by Universitas Syiah Kuala 
Published by Master of Science Education Study Program Graduate School Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia
Website : http://jurnal.usk.ac.id/jipi
Email     : jipi@usk.ac.id

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.