Analisis Kemampuan Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Mahasiswa Calon Guru Kimia

Maria Ulfah*, Erlina Erlina

Abstract


The effectiveness of a learning is determined by the combination of various dimensions of knowledge with technology carried out by teachers. This study aims to analyse the TPACKs’ skills of chemistry education students of FKIP Untan who will become the future chemistry teachers. The method employs in this study is descriptive. The participants involved in this research are the students of the class 2019 and 2020. The instrument used is the TPACK questionnaire which consist of 7 indicators. The results obtained from data analysis are that all aspects of students’ TAPCK are in good category with scores for each aspect TK, CK, PK, PCK, TCK, TPK and TPACK with successive values of 75.01, 73.52, 72.08, 70.36, 72.54, 78.43, and 72.43. The integration of the dimensions of content knowledge, technology and pedagogy is very necessary to become a teacher, especially for chemistry education students who will become the future chemistry teachers

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aktas, I. & Ozmen, H. 2020. Investigating the impact of TPACK. Asia Pasific Education Review, 21:667-682.

Carter, C.S. & Brickhouse, N.W. 1989. What makes chemistry difficult? Alternate perceptions. Journal of Chemical Education, 66(3):223-225.

Evans, M.A., Nino, M., Deater-Deckard, K., & Chang, M. 2015. School-wide adoption of a mathematics learning game in a middle school setting: Using the TPACK framework to analyze effects on practice. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(3):495-504.

Finger, G., Romeo, G., Lloyd, M., Heck, D., Sweeney, T., Albion, P., & Jamieson-Proctor, R. 2016. Developing graduate TPACK capabilities in initial teacher education programs: insights from the teaching teachers for the future project. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(3):505-513.

Gabel, D. 1998. The complexity of chemistry and implications for teaching. International handbook of science education, 1:233-248.

Guerrero, S. 2010. Technological pedagogical content knowledge in the mathematics classroom. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 26(4):132-139.

Huddle, P. & Pillay, A. 1996. An in‐depth study of misconceptions in stoichiometry and chemical equilibrium at a South African university. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(1):65-77.

Koehler, M.J. & Mishra, P. 2006. Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6):1017–1054.

Kind, V. 2004. Beyond appearances: Students’ misconceptions about basic chemical ideas. School of Education, Durham University, UK. Retrieved Sep, 25:2009.

Martin, B. 2015. Successful implementation of TPACK in teacher preparation programs. International Journal on Integrating Technology in Education, 4(1):17-26.

Nakhleh, M.B. 1992. Why some students don't learn chemistry: Chemical misconceptions, Journal of chemical education, 69(3):191-196.

Niess, M.L. 2005. Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5):509-523.

Nuangchalerm, P. 2020. Tpack in asean perspectives: Case study on thai pre-service teacher. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(4):993–999. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i4.20700.

Osborne, J. & Hennessy, S. 2003. Literature review in science education and the role of ICT: Promise, problems and future directions Future lab Series Report 6.

Özmen, H. 2004. Some student misconceptions in chemistry: A literature review of chemical bonding. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(2):147-159.

Ryan, B. & Cowie, B. 2009. Exploring the use of an interactive whiteboard in a primary science classroom. Set: Research Information for Teachers, (1):43-48.

Sagala, S. 2009. Kemampuan Profesional Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta

Schmidt, D.A., Baran, E., Thompson, A.D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M.J., & Shin, T.S. 2009. Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) the development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of research on Technology in Education, 42(2):123- 149.

Schmid, M., Brianza, E., & Petko, D. 2021. Self-reported technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) of pre-service teachers in relation to digital technology use in lesson plans. Computers in Human Behavior, 115. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.chb.2020.106586.

Schmidt, D.A., Thompson, A.D., Koehler, M.J., & Shin, T.S. 2014. CIE 2014 44th International Conference on Computers and Industrial Engineering and IMSS 2014 - 9th International Symposium on Intelligent Manufacturing and Service Systems, Joint International Symposium on "The Social Impacts of Developments in Informat. Informat, 42(2):2531p.

Slavin, R.E. 2009. Educational Psychology: Theory and Practices. 9th edition. New Jersey: Pearson.

Shulman, L.S. 1986. Those who understand, knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2):4-14.

Sjöström, J. 2007. The discourse of chemistry (and beyond). HYLE: International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry, 13(2):83-97.

Slabaugh, W. & Parsons, T. 1976, Solutions: General Chemistry, 203-226.

Shulman, L.S. 1986. Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational researcher, 15(2):4–14.

Swallow, M.J. & Olofson, M.W. 2017. Contextual understandings in the TPACK framework. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 49(3-4):228-244.

Tondeur, J., Pareja, R.N., van Braak, J., Voogt, J., & Prestridge, S. 2017. Preparing beginning teachers for technology integration in education: ready for take-off. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(2):157-177.

Taber, K. 2002, Chemical misconceptions: prevention, diagnosis and cure, Royal Society of Chemistry.

Watson, S.L. & Watson, W.R. 2011. The role of technology and computer-based instruction in a disadvantaged alternative school's culture of learning. Computers in the Schools, 28(1):39-55.

Yalçın, M. & Çelikler, D. 2011. The effect of computer-assisted applications in the teaching of “matter and heat” subject. Eğitim Araştirmalari Dergisi, (42):273-290.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/jipi.v6i3.26572

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal IPA & Pembelajaran IPA


JIPI (Jurnal IPA dan Pembelajaran IPA)

ISSN 2614-0500  (print) | 2620-553X (online)
Organized by Universitas Syiah Kuala 
Published by Master of Science Education Study Program Graduate School Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia
Website : http://jurnal.usk.ac.id/jipi
Email     : jipi@usk.ac.id

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.