Misconceptions of Intermolecular Forces in General Chemistry Courses

Maria Ulfah*, Erlina Erlina, Firra Meliana Pratiwiningrum, Azwa Fadilla Wafiq, Yusnita Binti Juahir

Abstract


The misconception is the most topic in chemistry learning that is important to analyze. There are many advantages for lecturers and students to know about misconceptions. This research aims to describe misconceptions in general chemistry courses, especially intermolecular forces (IMFs) topic. The two-tier multiple-choice tests have played an important role in helping researchers determine students’ level of understanding and in identifying specific misconceptions. The project used a convenience sample of 88 students (76 female and 12 male) chemistry education program that studied IMFs as participants. Misconception knew from the test’s second tier, which is the student’s reason for the answer. Surprisingly, 29 misconceptions were acquired from the test about IMFs concepts.  This needs to be a special concern for lecturers of basic chemistry courses in order to evaluate the learning process that has been carried out. Students misconceptions in basic chemistry courses will have an impact on organic chemistry courses because the concept of intermolecular forces will be studied in depth in organic chemistry courses. The success of students in organic chemistry courses is highly dependent on the initial knowledge of students, especially in basic chemistry courses

Keywords


Misconceptions, Two-tier test, Intermolecular Forces

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abraham, M. R., Williamson, V. M., & Westbrook, S. L. (1994). A cross-age study of the understanding of five chemistry concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(2), 147–165. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660310206

Akkuzu, N., & Uyulgan, M. A. (2016). An Epistemological Inquiry into Organic Chemistry Education: Exploration of Undergraduate Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Functional Groups. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(1), 36–57. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5rp00128e

Cooper, M. M., Williams, L. C., & Underwood, S. M. (2015). Student Understanding of Intermolecular Forces: A Multimodal Study. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(8), 1288–1298. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00169

Dhindsa, H. S., & Treagust, D. F. (2014). Prospective Pedagogy for Teaching Chemical Bonding for Smart and Sustainable Learning. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 15(4), 435–446. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RP00059E

Fahmi, & Irhasyuarna, Y. (2017). The Misconceptions of Senior High School Students in Banjarmasin on Chemical Bonding. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(17), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0701045461

Gilbert, J. K., & Treagust, D. F. (2009). Introduction: Macro, Submicro and Symbolic Representations and the Relationship Between Them: Key Models in Chemical Education. In Models and Modeling in Science Education (pp. 1–8). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8872-8_1

Islami, D., Suryaningsih, S., & Bahriah, E. S. (2019). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa pada Konsep Ikatan Kimia Menggunakan Tes Four-Tier Multiple-Choice (4TMC). JRPK: Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Kimia, 9(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.21009/jrpk.091.03

Johnstone, A. H. (2006). Chemical Education Research in Glasgow in Perspective. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7(2), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1039/B5RP90021B

Lee, D. C. B., & Beggs, G. A. (2021). Tactile Models for the Visualization, Conceptualization, and Review of Intermolecular Forces in the College Chemistry Classroom. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(4), 1328–1334. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00460

Nakhleh, M. B. (1992). Why Some Students Don’t Learn Chemistry: Chemical Misconceptions. Journal of Chemical Education, 69(3), 191–196. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed069p191

O ’Dwyer, A. (2012). Identification of the Difficulties in Teaching and Learning of Introductory Organic Chemistry in Ireland and the Development of a Second-Level Intervention Programme To Address These.

Othman, J., Treagust, D. F., & Chandrasegaran, A. L. (2008). An Investigation intoThe Relationship Between Students’ Conceptions of The Particulate Nature of Matter and Their Understanding of Chemical Bonding. International Journal of Science Education, 30(11), 1531–1550. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701459897

Özmen, H. (2008). The Influence of Computer-Assisted Instruction on Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Chemical Bonding and Attitude Toward Chemistry: A Case for Turkey. Computers and Education, 51(1), 423–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.06.002

Rahayu, D. S., & Fitriza, Z. (2021). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Peserta Didik Pada Materi Ikatan Kimia : Sebuah Studi Literatur. Edukatif : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(3), 1084–1091. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v3i3.510

Şekerci, A. R., & Erdem, A. R. (2022). The Development and Implementation of a Two-Tier Multiple Choice Test Related to The Concepts of Oxidation-Reduction Reactions and Galvanic Cells. Journal of Educational Sciences & Psychology, 12 (74)(1), 34–47. https://doi.org/10.51865/jesp.2022.1.05

Sirhan, G. (2007). Learning Difficulties in Chemistry: An Overview. Journal of Turkish Science Education , 4(2), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2012.38188

Sukib, & Mutiah. (2020). Representasi Makroskopik dan Simbolik Untuk Memahami Gaya Antarmolekul Pada Kromatografi Lapis Tipis. Jurnal Pijar MIPA, 15(3), 298–304. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v15i3.1887

Tarhan, L., Ayar-Kayali, H., Urek, R. O., & Acar, B. (2008). Problem-Based Learning in 9th Grade Chemistry Class: “Intermolecular Forces.” Research in Science Education, 38(3), 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9050-0

Uyulgan, M. A., Akkuzu, N., & Alpat, Ş. (2014). Assessing The Students’ Understanding Related to Molecular Geometry Using a Two-Tier Diagnostic Test. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 13(6), 839–855. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/14.13.839

Warsito, J., Subandi, & Parlan. (2020). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa pada Topik Ikatan Kimia Serta Perbaikannya dengan Pembelajaran Model ECIRR (Elicit, Confront, Identify, Resolve, Reinforce). Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 5(11), 1563. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v5i11.14158

Widarti, H. R., Marfuaf, S., & Retnosari, R. (2019). Identifying Students ’ Misconception About Intermolecular Forces Topic in Organic Chmeistry I Course. Unnes Science Education Journal, 8(1), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.15294/USEJ.V8I1.23527




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/jipi.v8i1.35641

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 JIPI (Jurnal IPA dan Pembelajaran IPA)



JIPI (Jurnal IPA dan Pembelajaran IPA)

ISSN 2614-0500  (print) | 2620-553X (online)
Organized by Universitas Syiah Kuala 
Published by Master of Science Education Study Program Graduate School Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia
Website : http://jurnal.usk.ac.id/jipi
Email     : jipi@usk.ac.id

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.