Extensive versus strategic reading for learning English at Khulna University, Bangladesh
Abstract
This article reports on a small-scale research study conducted to investigate the comparative utility of extensive reading versus strategic reading for learning English at the undergraduate level in the English Discipline at Khulna University, a public university in south-western Bangladesh. The study is based on the schema theory where background knowledge is the basis of comprehension. A pre-tested questionnaire was used to conduct a survey. Data was collected from 158 respondents, all undergraduate students in the English Department who were selected at random. The results of the study showed that strategic reading is more favorable to students compared to extensive reading for the purpose of learning ESL/EFL. Finally, the results showed that strategic reading was more effective than extensive reading for learning English. The paper concludes with a call for further large-scale studies.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Al-Issa, A. (2006). Schema theory and L2 reading comprehension: Implications for teaching. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 3(7), 41-48.
An, S. (2013). Schema theory in reading. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(1), 130-134.
Aprizani, Y. (2016). Improving reading comprehension using contextual teaching and learning (CTL). Studies in English Language and Education, 3(2), 170-187.
Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Dechant, E. V. (1982). Improving the teaching of reading (Third ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Garner, R. (1987). Metacognition and reading comprehension. Norwood: Ablex.
Gibson, K. D. (2009). Teachers’ perceptions of strategy based reading instruction for reading comprehension. (Master), Dominican University of California, San Rafael, California.
Hellekjær, G. O. (2015). Reading: From a forgotten to a basic skill. Språk & språkundervising, 2, 23-29.
Johansen, E. K. N. (2013). Reading strategies in upper secondary school: How and to what extent are reading strategies taught and used in Norwegian upper secondary schools? (Master), University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Mart, C. T. (2012). Developing speaking skills through reading. International Journal of English Linguistics, 2(6), 91-96.
Mermelstein, A. D. (2015). Improving EFL learners’ writing through enhanced extensive reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 27(2), 182-198.
Pietilä, P., & Merikivi, R. (2014). The impact of free-time reading on foreign language vocabulary development. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(1), 28-36.
Quiroz, G. (2014). Reading strategies of good and average bilingual readers of Chinese and Spanish backgrounds. (Master), University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Rahman, M. H. (2004). An evaluation of the teaching of reading skills of English in Bangladesh. (Master), University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi, Bangladesh. Retrieved from http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/Thesis/Thesis-Rahman.pdf
Sahardin, R., Mukarramah, M., & Hanafiah, A. (2015). A study on improving students’ reading comprehension using the Numbered Heads Together Technique. Studies in English Language and Education, 2(2), 132-143.
Short, M. (1996). Exploring the language of poems, plays and prose. Essex: Longman.
Simensen, A. M. (1998). Teaching a foreign language: Principles and procedures. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
Spears, D. (2013). Improving reading skills: Contemporary readings for college students (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Susser, B., & Robb, T. N. (1990). EFL extensive reading instruction: Research and procedure. JALT Journal, 12(2), 161-185.
Trask, L. R. (1997). The penguin guide to punctuation. New York: Penguin Putnam.
Ur, P. (2012). A Course in English language teaching. New Delhi: Cambridge University Press.
Urquhart, A. H., & Weir, C. J. (1998). Reading in a second language: Process, product and practice. London: Longman.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v5i2.11176
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 0 timesPDF - 0 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Print ISSN: 2355-2794, Online ISSN: 2461-0275
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.