Juridical Overview of the Syndication Financing Agreement Between Customers and Financial Institutions

Suwinto Johan, Ariawan Ariawan

Abstract


Companies need funding for business growth. Syndicated financing is financing in large amounts of funds and projects that require extensive and long-term financing. Syndi-cated financing has grown since the 1960s. Participating financial institutions have compliance and knowledge of syndicated financing agreements. Customers have low compliance and understanding of financing agreements. This discrepancy has given rise to several communication problems, which resulted in legal events. This research aims to examine syndicated financing agreements between financial institutions and customers from the juridical side. This research uses a normative juridical method. This research concludes that the financing agreement is a single agreement between customers and many financial institutions. Financial institutions cannot deal directly with customers in the syndicated financing agreements. The facility agent or trustee represents the financial institution in negotiations with the customer if there is a difference or discrepancy with the financing agreement.

Keywords


customers; financial institutions; syndicated loan.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Book

Marzuki, M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi - Prof (Revisi). Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Grup.

Journal Article

Asril, J. (2020). Beberapa Permasalahan dalam Syndicated Loan Agreement dan Security Sharing Agreement. Jurnal Ilmiah MEA, 4(1), 434–452.

Basovskaya, M. (2018). European Syndicated Loan Interconnectedness: Constituents and Its Contribution to Systemic Risk.

Demirgüç, A., Bálint, H., & Huizinga, H. (2017). Foreign Banks and International Transmission of Monetary Policy Evidence from the Syndicated Loan Market. In World Bank.

Djaman, A. (2019). Kajian Atas Kredit Sindikasi Ditinjau Dalam Hukum Kontrak. Lex Privatum, 7(5), 14–24.

Harahap, N. S., & Nurdin, A. R. (2020). Akibat Hukum Cessie Atas Kredit Yang Dialihkan Oleh Badan Penyehatan Perbankan Nasional Semasa Krisis Yang Merupakan Bagian Dari Kredit Sindikasi (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Utara Nomor 555/PDT.G/2018/PN.JKT.UTR). Indonesian Notary, 2(3), 799–819.

Honandar, L. N. (2017). Kajian Yuridis Terhadap Kredit Sindikasi Berdasarkan Sistem Perkreditan Perbankan di Indonesia. Lex Crimen, 6(9), 89–96.

Johan, S., & Ariawan, A. (2021). Keterbukaan Informasi Uu Pasar Modal Menciptakan Asymmetric Information Dan Semi Strong Form. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 50(1), 106–118. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.50.1.2021.106-118

Murwadji, T. (2013). Transformasi Jaminan Kebendaan Menjadi Jaminan Tunai Dalam Penjaminan Kredit Sindikasi Internasional. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 20(1), 98–118.

Nefi, A., & Warman, A. (2008). Metode Pengalihan Kredit Sindikasi. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 38(3), 371–391.

Noraini, A., & Rusni, H. (2020). A Systematic Review of Factors Influencing the Adoption of Conventional and Islamic Syndicated Bank Financing. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 7(8), 1549–1568.

Raih Cita, H., Abubakar, L., & Mulyati, E. (2018). Kedudukan Hukum Kreditur Baru Penerima Pengalihan Piutang Tanpa Persetujuan Agen Dan Peserta Sindikasi Lainnya. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 3(1), 29–42.

Sumriyah. (2018). Analisis Risiko Dalam Kredit Sindikasi Pada Bank Konvensional. Yustitia, 19(1), 95–102.

Tettey, J. R. (2017). A Critical Legal Analysis of Aspects of Syndicated Loan Transactions.

Tirana, G., Abubakar, L., & Handayani, T. (2019). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pembeli Piutang Atas Jaminan Hak Guna Bangunan Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Sindikasi. Acta Diurnal Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan Dan Ke-PPAT-An, 2(2), 267–285.

Trianto, A., & Suhardiman, C. (2015). Penerapan Penjelasan Pasal 2 Ayat (1) Undang Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Sindikasi. Jurnal Filsafat Hukum, 1(1), 1–27.

Umardani, M. K. (2017). Kredit Sindikasi Dalam Perspektif Hukum dan Peraturan Perbankan (Studi Kasus Pada PT. BANK DKI). ADIL: Jurnal Hukum, 7(1), 90–110.

Zulfiqar, A., Husni, L., Wira, L., Suhartana, P., Program, M., Magister, S., … Sindikasi, K. (2019). Implikasi Yuridis Perubahan Status Bank Ntb Menjadi. Jurnal Education and Development, 7(4), 368–375.

Internet

Bisnis.com (2021, July 25). Jusuf Hamka Merasa Diperas Bank Syariah, Asbisindo Sebut Akad Perlu Dilihat Lagi. Retrieved July, 26 2021 from Tempo.co: https://bisnis.tempo.co/read/1486983/jusuf-hamka-merasa-diperas-bank-syariah-asbisindo-sebut-akad-perlu-dilihat-lagi

Djumena (2021, July 26). Bank Syariah Kejam, Ini Klarifikasi Jusuf Hamka. Retrieved July 26, 2021 from Kompas.com: https://money.kompas.com/read/2021/07/26/063800926/soal-bank-syariah-kejam-ini-klarifikasi-jusuf-hamka?page=all

Karunia, Ade Miranti (2021, July 24). OJK Akan Panggil Jusuf Hamka Soal Dugaan Pemerasan Oleh Bank Syariah Swasta. Retrieved July 26, 2021 from Kompas.com: https://money.kompas.com/read/2021/07/24/194321226/ojk-akan-panggil-jusuf-hamka-soal-dugaan-pemerasan-oleh-bank-syariah-swasta?page=all

Atmoko, Citro (2021, July 24). OJK Akan Panggil Jusuf Hamka Untuk Klarifikasi Soal Bank Syariah. Retrieved July 26, 2021 from Antaranews.com: https://www.antaranews.com/berita/2286390/ojk-akan-panggil-jusuf-hamka-untuk-klarifikasi-soal-bank-syariah.

Detik.com (2021, July 24) Laporkan Bank Syariah ke Polisi, Jusuf Hamka: Sudah Naik Sidik. Retrieved July 26, 2021 from Detikcom: https://finance.detik.com/moneter/d-5655588/laporkan-bank-syariah-ke-polisi-jusuf-hamka-sudah-naik-sidik




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v23i3.21920

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
P-ISSN 0854-5499
E-ISSN 2527-8428
Published by Faculty of Law, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia