Implementation of Participatory Training Model to Develop Teachers' Ability to Design Formative Assessment Instruments in Science Learning

Muslim Muslim*, Nuryani Y Rustaman, Parsaoran Siahaan, Winny Liliawati, Ridwan Efendi

Abstract


Formative assessment is an essential aspect of learning. Facts in the field show that there still needs to be more teachers who conduct formative assessments during the learning process. The assessment that carries out assesses the final results of learning through summative. This study aims to analyze the ability of science teachers to design formative assessment instruments in science teaching through the implementation of the participatory training model. The research method used is descriptive research with a quantitative approach. The research subjects were 30 junior high school science teachers in Sumedang Regency. Data collection instruments are formative assessment product sheets made by teachers and questionnaires. Data analysis techniques include data reduction, presentation, and conclusion drawing. The results showed that the ability of teachers to design formative instrument assessments was categorized as good. Teachers can create formative instrument assessments integrated into science learning in a varied manner. Teachers' responses to the strengthening and mentoring


Keywords


teachers' ability; innovative formative assessment; science learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. 1999. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academy Press, Washington DC.

Bulunuz, N., Bulunuz, M. & Peker, H. 2014. Effects Of Formative Assessment Probes Integrated in Extra-Curricular Hands-on Science: Middle School Students' Understanding. Journal of Baltic Science Education, (13)2:243-258.

Đorić, B., Lambić, D., & Jovanović, Z. 2021. The Use of Different Simulations and Different Types of Feedback and Students’ Academic Performance in Physics. Research in Science Education, 51:1437–1457.

Ferrero, M., Hardwicke, T., & Vadillo, M. A. 2020. The effectiveness of refutation texts to correct misconceptions among educators. Journal of experimental psychology. doi:10.1037/xap0000258.

Furtak, E. M., Kiemer, K., Circi, R. K., Swanson, R., de Leo´n, V., Morrison, D., & Heredia, S. C. 2016. Teachers’ formative assessment abilities and their relationship to student learning: findings from a four-year intervention study. Instructional Science, 44:267–291. doi: 10.1007/s11251-016-9371-3.

Ganajová, M., Sotáková, I., Lukáč, S., Ješková, Z., Jurková, V., & Orosová, R. 2021. Formative assessment as a tool to enhance the development of inquiry skills in science educatioan. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 20 (2). doi:10.33225/jbse/21.20.204.

Ismail, S. M., Rahul, D. R., Patra, I. & Rezvani, E. 2022. Formative vs. summative assessment: impacts on academic motivation, attitude toward learning, test anxiety, and self‑regulation skill. Language Testing in Asia, (12):40. 12:40 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00191-4.

Keeley, P. (2011). Uncovering Studen Ideas in Life Science: 25 New formative Assessment Probes. NSTA Press, Virginia.

Keeley, P. (2016). Science formative assessment Second Edition: 75 practical strategies for linking assessment, instruction, and learning. Corwin Press, California.

Keeley, P., Eberle, & Tugel. 2007. Uncovering Student Ideas in Science: Formative Assessment Probes. The Science Teacher, (74) 4.

McCallum, S. & Milner, M. 2020. The effectiveness of formative assessment: student views and staff reflections. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1754761

Pylbour, C. 2015. Integrating Formative Assessment into Physics Instruction: The Effect of Formative vs. Summative Assessment on Student Physics Learning and Attitudes, Dissertation, Western Michigan University, U.S.A.

Riduwan. 2018. Skala Pengukuran Variabel-Variabel Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sabel, J. L., Forbes, C. T., & Flynn, L. 2016. Elementary teachers’ use of content knowledge to evaluate students’ thinking in the life sciences. International Journal of Science Education, 38(7), 1077–1099. doi:10.1080/09500693.2016.1183179.

Schildkampa, K., Van Der Kleijb, F. B., Heitinka, M.C., Kippersa, W. B. & Veldkampa, B. P. 2022. Formative assessment: A systematic review of critical teacher prerequisites for classroom practice. International Journal of Educational Research, 103 (2020) 101602. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101602.

Sofianto, E. W. N., Wartono, Kusairi, S. 2016. Pengaruh Balikan Formatif Terintegrasi Strategi Pembelajaran Diagram Vee dan Kemampuan Awal Terhadap Penguasaan Konsep Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 12 (2): 183-188. https://doi.org/ 10.15294/jpfi.v12i2.4269.

Stiggins, R. J. 2002. Assessment crisis: The absence of assessment for learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(10): 758–765.

Van der Kleij, F. M., Vermeulen, J. A., Schildkamp, K., & Eggen, T. J. H. M. 2015. Integrating data-based decision making, assessment for learning and diagnostic testing in formative assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22, 324–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2014.999024.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/jipi.v7i1.29657

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 29 times
PDF - 14 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 JIPI (Jurnal IPA & Pembelajaran IPA)


JIPI (Jurnal IPA dan Pembelajaran IPA)

ISSN 2614-0500  (print) | 2620-553X (online)
Organized by Universitas Syiah Kuala 
Published by Master of Science Education Study Program Graduate School Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia
Website : http://jurnal.usk.ac.id/jipi
Email     : jipi@usk.ac.id

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.