Designing a STEM Project-Based Learning Module for Scientific Literacy and Critical Thinking Elementary School Students
Abstract
STEM education is useful for facing 21st century competition. However, the availability of STEM project-based learning (STEM-PjBL) modules for enhancing scientific literacy and critical thinking Indonesian students is still rare, especially at the elementary school level. The objective of this study is to design a STEM-PjBL module that enhances students' 21st-century skills, specifically focusing on improving their scientific literacy and critical thinking capabilities by organizing the constructs and items within the module. This study is qualitative research at the stage of designing the content of STEM-PjBL module using literature reviews and expert interviews. The acquired data underwent thematic analysis for examination. The resulting module construct includes module objectives; module structure; module content that includes STEM components; scientific literacy components, and critical thinking components; learning aids or media; and assessment in modules with accompanying items for each construct. The resulting module construct and item are used as the basis for the next stage, namely the module development stage. This study holds significance for advancing STEM education in Indonesia and serves as a valuable asset, particularly for initiatives highlighting STEM-PjBL learning activities aimed at enhancing 21st-century skills
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adriyawati, Utomo, E., Rahmawati, Y., & Mardiah, A. 2020. Steam-project-based learning integration to improve elementary school students’ scientific literacy on alternative energy learning. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(5):1863–1873. https://doi.org/10. 13189/ujer.2020.080523
Alkhatib, O.J. 2019. A Framework for implementing higher-order thinking skills (problem-solving, critical thinking, creative thinking, and decision-making) in engineering & humanities. https://www.aacu.org/
Almeida, B., Santos, M., & Justi, R. 2022. Aspects and abilities of science literacy in the context of nature of science teaching. Science and Education, 32(3):567-587. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s11191-022-00324-4
Anggraena, Y., Ginanto, D., Felicia, N., Andriati, A., Herutami, I., Alhapip, L., Iswoyo, S., Hartini, Y., & Mahardika, R.L. 2022. Panduan Pembelajaran dan Asesmen: Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Pendidikan Dasar, dan Menengah. https://kurikulum.kemdikbud.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Panduan-Pembelajarn-dan-Asesmen.pdf
Aránguiz, P., Palau-Salvador, G., Belda, A., & Peris, J. 2020. Critical thinking using project-based learning: The case of the agroecological market at the Universitat Politècnica de València. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(9):1-23. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12093553
Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority. 2016. Acara STEM Connections Project Report. https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/media/3220/stem-connections-report.pdf
Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority. 2021. General Capabilities: Critical and Creative Thinking. https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/copyright-and-terms-of-use
Bell, S. 2010. Project-Based Learning for the 21st Century: skills for the future. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(2):39–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505415
Belwal, R., Belwal, S., Sufian, A.B., & Al Badi, A. 2020. Project-based learning (PBL): outcomes of students’ engagement in an external consultancy project in Oman. Education and Training, 63(3):336–359. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-01-2020-0006
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2):77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
BSKAP Kemendikbudristek. 2022. Capaian Pembelajaran Pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar, dan Jenjang Pendidikan Menengah Pada Kurikulum Merdeka. https://kurikulum.kemdikbud.go.id/wp-content/unduhan/CP_2022.pdf
Chambers, B., Salter, A., & Muldrow, L. 2019. Getting past the gateway: An exploratory case on using utilitarian scientific literacy to support first-year students at-risk of leaving STEM. Education Sciences, 9(4):1-11. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9040265
Coronado, J.M., Moyano, A., Romero, V., Ruiz, R., & Rodríguez, J. 2021. Student long-term perception of project-based learning in civil engineering education: An 18-year ex-post assessment. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(4):1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su130 41949
Costa, A.M., Ferreira, M.E., & da Silva Loureiro, M.J. 2021. Scientific literacy: the conceptual framework prevailing over the first decade of the twenty-first century. In Revista Colombiana de Educacion, 1(81):195–228. Research Center of Universidad Pedagogica Nacional. https://doi.org/10.17227/RCE.NUM81-10293
Cunningham, C.M. 2018. Engineering in Elementary STEM Education: Curriculum Design, Instruction, Learning, and Assessment Focus Questions Focus Questions. Museum of Science, Boston.
DeMink-Carthew, J., & Olofson, M.W. 2020. Hands-joined learning as a framework for personalizing project-based learning in a middle grades classroom: an exploratory study. RMLE Online, 43(2):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404476.2019.1709776
Dewi, C.A., Erna, M., Martini, Haris, I., & Kundera, I.N. 2021. Effect of contextual collaborative learning based ethnoscience to increase student’s scientific literacy ability. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(3):525–541. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2021.88
Duke, N.K., Halvorsen, A.L., Strachan, S.L., Kim, J., & Konstantopoulos, S. 2021. Putting PjBL to the test: the impact of project-based learning on second graders’ social studies and literacy learning and motivation in low-ses school settings. American Educational Research Journal, 58(1):160–200. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831220929638
Ellison, S. & Allen, B. 2018. Disruptive innovation, labor markets, and big valley STEM school: network analysis in STEM education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 13(1):267–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-016-9786-9
English, L.D. & King, D.T. 2015. STEM learning through engineering design: fourth-grade students’ investigations in aerospace. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(1):1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0027-7
Ennis, R.H. 2018. Critical thinking across the curriculum: A vision. Topoi, 37(1):165–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-016-9401-4
Facione, P.A. 2015. Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. https://www.law.uh.edu/blakely/advocacy-survey/Critical%20Thinking%20Skills.pdf
Firdaus, M. & Asmali. 2021. Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Berbasis Literasi Sains. https://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/25166/1/2203011837-2-PDF_86401.pdf
Galadima, U., Ismail, Z., & Ismail, N. 2019. A need analysis for developing integrated stem course training module for pre-service mathematics teachers. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 8(5):47–52. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijeat. E1006.0585C19
Gane, B.D., Israel, M., Elagha, N., Yan, W., Luo, F., & Pellegrino, J.W. 2021. Design and validation of learning trajectory-based assessments for computational thinking in upper elementary grades. Computer Science Education, 31(2):141–168. https://doi.org/10. 1080/08993408.2021.1874221
Gertner, D., Xu, N., Porter-Morgan, H., & Brashears, J. 2021. Developing students’ scientific literacy through an e-portfolio project at a community college gateway science course. Journal of Biological Education, 57(1):129-144. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266. 2021.1877782
Gormally, C., Brickman, P., & Lut, M. 2012. Developing a test of scientific literacy skills (TOSLS): Measuring undergraduates’ evaluation of scientific information and arguments. CBE Life Sciences Education, 11(4):364–377. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-03-0026
Guo, P., Saab, N., Post, L.S., & Admiraal, W. 2020. A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures. International Journal of Educational Research, 102:101586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101586
Han, S., Rosli, R., Capraro, M.M., & Capraro, R.M. 2016. The effect of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) project based learning (PBL) on students’ achievement in four mathematics topics. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 13(Specialissue):3–29. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10168a
Hasanah, U., & Silitonga, M. 2020. Implementasi Gerakan Literasi Sekolah di Sekolah Dasar (P. Retnaningdyah, K. Julizar, & I. Widjaja, Eds.). Pusat Penelitian Kebijakan, Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan dan Perbukuan, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. http://puslitjakdikbud.kemdikbud.go.id
Herman, B.C., Owens, D.C., Oertli, R.T., Zangori, L.A., & Newton, M.H. 2019. Exploring the complexity of students’ scientific explanations and associated nature of science views within a place-based socioscientific issue context. Science and Education, 28(3–5):329–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00034-4
Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H.A. 2014. STEM integration in K-12 education : status, prospects, and an agenda for research. The National Academic Press.
Ijirana, Aminah, S., Supriadi, & Magfirah. 2022. Critical thinking skill of chemistry education students in team project-based STEM-metacognitive skills learning during the covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 12(2):397–409. https://doi.org/ 10.3926/jotse.1697
Jolly, A. 2017. STEM by Design: Strategies and Activities for grades 4-8. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. www.routledge.com/eyeoneducation
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2020). Rencana Strategis: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan 2020-2024. https://dikti.kemdikbud.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/ Renstra-kemendikbud-full-version.pdf
Khandakar, A., Chowdhury, M.E.H., Gonzales, A.S.P., Touati, F., Emadi, N.Al, & Ayari, M.A. 2020. Case study to analyze the impact of multi-course project-based learning approach on education for sustainable development. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(2):1-21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020480
Khurma, O.A., Al Darayseh, A., & Alramamneh, Y. 2023. A framework for incorporating the “learning how to learn” approach in teaching STEM education. Education Sciences, 13(1):1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13010001
Kivunja, C. 2018. Distinguishing between theory, theoretical framework, and conceptual framework: A systematic review of lessons from the field. International Journal of Higher Education, 7(6):44–53. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v7n6p44
Kızkapan, O. & Bektaş, O. 2017. The effect of project based learning on seventh grade students’ academic achievement 1. International Journal of Instruction, 10(1):37–54. https://doi. org/10.12973/iji.2017.1013a
Komada, T., Yamaguchi, K., & Suzuki, M. 2022. An efficient method to produce accessible contents for online STEM education. Conference paper in International Conference on Computers Helping Peple with Special Needs, 13341 LNCS, 15–21. https://doi.org/10. 1007/978-3-031-08648-9_3
Lou, S.J., Chou, Y.C., Shih, R.C., & Chung, C.C. 2017. A study of creativity in CaC2 steamship-derived stem project-based learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6):2387–2404. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01231A
Magnus, D.D.M., Carbonera, L.F.B., Pfitscher, L.L., Farret, F.A., Bernardon, D.P., & Tavares, A.A. 2020. An educational laboratory approach for hybrid project-based learning of synchronous machine stability and control: a case study. IEEE Transactions on Education, 63(1):48–55. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2019.2956909
Markula, A. & Aksela, M. 2022. The key characteristics of project-based learning: how teachers implement projects in K-12 science education. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 4(2):1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-021-00042-x
Ministry of Education. 2019. Science in the New Zealand Curriculum: Understanding progress from levels 2 to 4. NMSSA. www.scienceonline.tki.org.nz
Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., & Foy, P. 2016. TIMSS 2015 International Results in Science. https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2015/international-results/wp-content/uploads/filebase/full%20pdfs/T15-International-Results-in-Science-Grade-8.pdf
Nagarajan, S. & Overton, T. 2019. Promoting systems thinking using project- and problem-based learning. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(12):2901–2909. https://doi.org/10. 1021/acs.jchemed.9b00358
Nizam. 2016. Ringkasan Hasil-hasil Asesmen Belajar Dari Hasil UN, PISA, TIMSS, INAP. https://www.geocities.ws/mrteddy/profnizam1.pdf
OECD. 2017. How does PISA for Development measure scientific literacy? (PISA). OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264208780-en
OECD. 2023. PISA 2022 Results (Volume II). OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/a97db61c-en
Pekbay, C. 2023. A sample STEM activity based on the engineering design process: A study on prospective preschool teachers’ views. Participatory Educational Research, 10(1):86–105. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.23.5.10.1
Purnomo, A.R., Yulianto, B., Mahdiannur, M.A., & Subekti, H. 2023. Embedding sustainable development goals to support curriculum merdeka using projects in biotechnology. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(1):406–433. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.1.23
Purwanto, Y.P.B., Masykuri, M., Soeparmi, & Elisanti, E. 2019. Analysis of science students critical thinking skill in junior high school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1233(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012086
Qian, W. 2022. The development strategy of the multimedia fusion mode of big data technology in japanese translation teaching. Advances in Multimedia, 1:1-11. https://doi.org/ 10.1155/2022/9408108
Quinn, H., Schweingruber, H., & Keller, T. 2012. A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. In A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165
Richard, P.B., & Elder, L. 2006. The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking: Concepts and Tools. www.criticalthinking.org
Richey, R.C., & Klein, J.C. 2007. Design and Development Research. Routledge.
Rizki, I.A. & Suprapto, N. 2024. Project-oriented problem-based learning through sr-stem to foster students’ critical thinking skills in renewable energy material. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 33(4):526-541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-024-10102-2
Rochman, C., Nasudin, D., & Rokayah, R. 2019. Science literacy on science technology engineering and math (STEM) learning in elementary schools. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1318(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1318/1/012050
Samat, N.A., Ibrahim, N.H., Surif, J., Ali, M., Abullah, A.H., Talib, C.A., & Bunyamin, A.H. 2019. Chem-a module based on stem approach in chemical bond. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 7(6S5):700–710. https://www.ijrte.org/wp-content/uploads/ papers/v7i6s5/F11230476S519.pdf
Schunk, D.H. 2012. Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective. Pearson.
SEAMEO Regional Centre. 2021. Introduction to STEAM Education. https://www.scribd.com/ document/689240669/Introduction-to-STEAM-Education-Activities-PPT
Setiawan, B., Reza, R., Farid, D.A.M., Sugandi, E., & Iasha, V. 2023. Augmented reality as learning media: the effect on elementary school students’ science processability in terms of cognitive style. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 23(10):60–71. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v23i10.6182
Setyowati, R., Sarwanto, & Muzzazinah. 2021. How students’s higher order thinking skills through e-Learning during the covid-19 pandemic? what does it have to do with university? IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1808(1). https://doi.org/10. 1088/1742-6596/1808/1/012032
Shu, Y. & Huang, T.C. 2021. Identifying the potential roles of virtual reality and stem in maker education. Journal of Educational Research, 114(2):108–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 00220671.2021.1887067
Siew, N.M. & Ambo, N. 2018. Development and evaluation of an integrated project-based and stem teaching and learning module on enhancing scientific creativity among fifth graders. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(6):1017–1033. http://dx.doi.org/10.33225/jbse/ 18.17.1017
Solihati, N. & Hikmat, A. 2018. Critical thinking tasks manifested in indonesian language textbooks for Senior secondary students. SAGE Open, 8(3):1-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 2158244018802164
State Superintendent of Public Instruction. 2014. Innovate: A Blueprint for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics in California Public Education. http://www.cde.ca.gov/pd/ ca/sc/documents/innovate.pdf.
Suardana, I.N., Redhana, I.W., Sudiatmika, A.A.I.A.R., & Selamat, I.N. 2018. Students’ critical thinking skills in chemistry learning using local culture-based 7E learning cycle model. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2):399–412. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018. 11227a
Susanto, T.T.D., Dwiyanti, P.B., Marini, A., Sagita, J., Safitri, D., & Soraya, E. 2022. E-book with problem based learning to improve student critical thinking in science learning at elementary school. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 16(20):4–17. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v16i20.32951
The Ontario Public Service. 2022. The Ontario Curriculum: Grade 1-8 Science and Technology. https://assets-us-01.kc-usercontent.com/fbd574c4-da36-0066-a0c5-849ffb2de96e/2674c944-8ede-43d8-aa39-55156a0468ac/The%20Ontario%20Curriculum%20Grades%201–8%20–%20Science%20and%20Technology%202022.pdf
Toma, R.B. & Greca, I.M. 2018. The effect of integrative stem instruction on elementary students’ attitudes toward science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(4):1383–1395. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/83676
Tomblin, D., & Mogul, N. 2020. STS Postures: responsible innovation and research in undergraduate STEM education. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 7(S1):117–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1839230
Umar, Ockta, Y., & Mardesia, P. 2023. A correlational study: pedagogical and professional competence of physical education teachers in relation to the implementation of the merdeka curriculum. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 23(12):3325–3331. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2023.12380
Ummah, S.K., In’am, A., & Azmi, R. D. 2019. Creating manipulatives: improving students’ creativity through project-based learning. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(1):93–102. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.1.5093.93-102
Vossen, T.E., Tigelaar, E.H., Henze, I., De Vries, M.J., & Van Driel, J.H. 2020. Student and teacher perceptions of the functions of research in the context of a design-oriented stem module. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 30(4):657–686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09523-7
Wahyu, Y., Suastra, I.W., Sadia, I.W., & Suarni, N.K. 2020. The effectiveness of mobile augmented reality assisted stem-based learning on scientific literacy and students’ achievement. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3):343–356. https://doi.org/10. 29333/iji.2020.13324a
Wan, Z.H., So, W.M.W., & Zhan, Y. 2022. Developing and validating a scale of stem project-based learning experience. Research in Science Education, 52(2):599–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09965-3
Wang, S. 2022. Critical thinking development through project-based learning. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 13(5):1007–1013. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr. 1305.13
Wang, Y., Lavonen, J., & Tirri, K. 2019. An assessment of how scientific literacy-related aims are actualised in the national primary science curricula in China and Finland. International Journal of Science Education, 41(11):1435–1456. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693. 2019.1612120
Wei, Y., Wang, F., Pan, Z., Wang, M., Jin, G., Liu, Y., & Lu, X. 2021. Development of a competency model for general practitioners after standardized residency training in China by a modified delphi method. BMC Family Practice, 22(1):1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/ s12875-021-01508-7
White, D.W. 2014. what is stem education and why is it important?. White Florida Association of Teacher Educators Journla, 1(14):1-8. http://www.fate1.org/journals/2014/white.pdf
Wieselmann, J.R., Sager, M.T., & Price, B.C. 2022. Stem project-based instruction: an analysis of teacher-developed integrated stem pbi curriculum units. Education Sciences, 12(9):1-21. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12090626
Winarni, E.W., Hambali, D., & Purwandari, E.P. 2020. Analysis of language and scientific literacy skills for 4th grade elementary school students through discovery learning and ict media. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2):213–222. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020. 13215a
Yata, C., Ohtani, T., & Isobe, M. 2020. Conceptual framework of stem based on japanese subject principles. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(12):1-10. https://doi.org/ 10.1186/s40594-020-00205-8
Zainal, N.F.A., Din, R., Nasrudin, M.F., Abdullah, S., Rahman, A.H.A., Abdullah, S.N.H.S., Ariffin, K.A.Z., Jaafar, S.M., & Majid, N.A.A. 2018. Robotic prototype and module specification for increasing the interest of Malaysian students in stem education. International Journal of Engineering and Technology (UAE), 7(3):286–290. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3. 25.17583
Zuliana, E., Oktavianti, I., Ratnasari, Y., & Bintoro, H.S. 2020. Design and application of marionette tangram: An educational teaching media for mathematics and social science learning process in elementary schools. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(3):931–935. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080326
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v12i3.38255
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 0 timesPDF - 0 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Riski Septiadevana, Norazilawati Abdullah
Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Science Education)
ISSN 2338-4379 (print) | 2615-840X (online)
Organized by Universitas Syiah Kuala
Published by Master of Science Education Study Program Graduate School Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia
Website : http://jurnal.usk.ac.id/jpsi
Email : jpsi@usk.ac.id
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.