Seismic Performance Analysis of Endo Indonesia Office Surabaya Building Structures Against Structural Irregularities

Mohammad Tomita Maha Putra, Krisna Murti, Erno Widayanto

Abstract

The structure of the building will be stable if the response of the structure is able to ignore the static and dynamic loads. The behavioral stability of the building structure is also influenced by geometry, configuration of horizontal and vertical elements, rigidity, lateral ability, and daktility of the structure. (Khanal & Chaulagain, 2020). When the structure configuration of the building is irregular, there will be eccentricity which means that the center of the mass is incorrectly at the centre of rigidity (Faisal & Darsono, 2019). If such conditions are not anticipated, the structure will be tortured until it eventually collapses. (Naveen dkk., 2019). In Surabaya there are office buildings that have irregular structures. This research will model the structure of the building into five variations. Each variation has a reduction in the value of structural irregularity. Next, we will examine the impact of structural irregularities on the reaction of structures of buildings. The results of the analysis showed that the irregularity of the inner angle had a significant impact on the shift of the roof, with the R-square of 0.9025 in the X axis and 0.9872 in the Y axis. Furthermore, based on the value of the soft level rigidity to the earthquake style at each level, R-quares of 0.8433 were found at the X-axis, and 0.825 at the Y-axe. Furthermore, changes in the inner angle of variations 2, 3, 4, and 5 resulted in successive increases in the mass of the structure by 0.18%, 4.09%, 7.86%, and 0.43%. These increases result in an increase in the basic sliding style in both directions. The variation 5 building designed without an inner angle showed an increase of 0.46% in the base sling style in either direction. Movement targets based on ASCE 41-13 NSP are 321.903 mm and 308.497 mm for the X and Y directions, respectively, which are in the Life Safety and Immediate Occupancy categories. While the total maximum drift values based on ATC-40 for the x and y directions are 0.0148 and 0.0150. The performance of the existing building structure is between B to C on the level of damage control (Immediate Occupancy to Life Safety), which means the building has suffered minor non-structural damage and may suffer structural damage but can still be repaired.

 Keywords

Structural irregularities, Seismic performance, Pushover analysis

 Full Text:

PDF

References

B. Khanal dan H. Chaulagain, “Seismic Elastic Performance of L-Shaped Building Frames Through Plan Irregularities,” Structures, vol. 27, hlm. 22–36, Okt 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2020.05.017.

A. Faisal dan A. P. Darsono, “Perilaku Nonlinear Struktur Gedung Baja dengan Bentuk Denah L, T dan U Akibat Gempa,” Progress in Civil Engi-neering Journal, vol. 1, no. 1, hlm. 63–73, 2019, Diakses: 7 Mei 2023. [Daring]. Tersedia pada: https://jurnal.umsu.ac.id/index.php/PCEJ/article/view/3283

S. E. Naveen, N. M. Abraham, dan A. K. S. D, “Analysis of Irregular Structures under Earth-quake Loads,” dalam Procedia Structural Integ-rity, Bangalore, India: Elsevier B.V., 2019, hlm. 806–819. doi: 10.1016/j.prostr.2019.07.059.

Humas BMKG, “Penjelasan BMKG Mengenai Ramalan Gempa Surabaya - Madura | BMKG,” Badan Meteorologi, Klimatologi, dan Geofisika. Diakses: 6 Mei 2023. [Daring]. Tersedia pada: https://www.bmkg.go.id/press-release/?p=penjelasan-bmkg-mengenai-ramalan-gempa-surabaya-madura&tag=press-release〈=ID

N. Rahmayanti dan H. Y. Labiba, “Evaluasi Kinerja Gedung Apartemen 10 Lantai dengan Ketidakberaturan Horizontal,” Semesta Teknika, vol. 24, no. 1, hlm. 23–33, Sep 2021, doi: 10.18196/st.v24i1.11676.

E. Desimaliana, N. V. Diredja, dan R. Syahputra, “Analisis Pushover terhadap Ketidakberaturan Horizontal pada Struktur Gedung Baja Kompos-it,” RekaRacana: Jurnal Teknik Sipil, vol. 08, no. 02, hlm. 118–124, Jul 2022, doi: 10.26760/rekaracana.

A. S. Bhosale, R. Davis, dan P. Sarkar, “Seismic Safety of Vertically Irregular Buildings: Perfor-mance of Existing Indicators,” Journal of Archi-tectural Engineering, vol. 24, no. 3, Sep 2018, doi: 10.1061/(asce)ae.1943-5568.0000319.

S. M. Hussain dan S. K. Tengli, “Study on Tor-sional Effects of Irregular Buildings Under Seis-mic Loads,” International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, vol. 13, no. 7, hlm. 55–60, 2018, [Daring]. Tersedia pada: http://www.ripublication.com

U. Khoirunnissa, R. Djakfar, dan Y. Setiawan, “Analisis Dinamik Respon Struktur Gedung Beraturan dan Ketidakberaturan Horizontal,” Maret, vol. 2, no. 1, hlm. 59–68, Mar 2020, doi: 10.32722/cmj.v2i1.2758.

BSN, SNI 1726:2019 Tata Cara Perencanaan Ketahanan Gempa untuk Struktur Bangunan Gedung dan Nongedung. 2019.

ASCE 41-13, Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings. Reston, VA: American Socie-ty of Civil Engineers, 2014. doi: 10.1061/9780784412855.

FEMA 440, Improvement of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures. 2005.

BSN, SNI 1727:2020 Beban Desain Minimum dan Kriteria Terkait Untuk Bangunan Gedung dan Struktur Lain. 2020.

Direktorat Penyelidikan Masalah Bangunan, Peraturan Pembebanan Indonesia untuk Ge-dung 1983, vol. 1. Bandung: Yayasan Lembaga Penyelidikan Masalah Bangunan, 1983.

N. A. Attathira, Wahiddin, dan A. D. Lestari, “Pengaruh Ketidakberaturan Vertikal Tingkat Lunak dan Massa Terhadap Gedung Bertingkat Akibat Beban Gempa Berdasarkan SNI-1726-2019 - MRK,” Jurnal Online Skripsi, vol. 3, no. 3, hlm. 142–146, Sep 2022, Diakses: 21 Januari 2024. [Daring]. Tersedia pada: http://jos-mrk.polinema.ac.id/

Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D, 19 ed. Bandung: ALFABETa, 2013. Diakses: 21 Januari 2024. [Daring]. Tersedia pada: www.cvalfabeta.com

ATC 40, Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings, vol. 1. California, 1996.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/jts.v13i1.37050

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.