Kelas Kita Based Blended Learning: Biology Learning Model to Improve Student Activities, Attitudes, and Achievements

Anda Juanda, Kartimi Kartimi, Dessy Indriani, Dindin Nasrudin

Abstract


In the current era of technological development, the flow of information and knowledge is very quickly updated, so that facilities are needed to compensate, especially in the field of education. Conventional learning models can support interactions between teachers and students, but on the other hand, this model is less able to provide facilities in the form of access to information anytime and anywhere. These weaknesses can be overcome by online learning, so that a blended learning solution appears, which still considers the interaction of teachers and students and expands learning opportunities because it is not limited to time and place. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of blended learning based on kelas kita network sites in improving student achievement, activities, and learning attitudes. The subjects of this study were two classes of MA students (experimental class of 33 students and control class of 34 students) in Cirebon, Indonesia. The biological material chosen in this study was environmental change. The study design used a Pretest-Posttest control group. Data collection techniques employed observation, tests, and questionnaires. From the results of the study, it provides information that the experimental class applied blended learning model had significantly different achievements, activities, and learning attitudes (sig <0.05) compared to the control class. Students had an enthusiastic attitude because they were given the opportunity to explore their potential in studying literature based on kelas kita network. The implication of this research is that a blended learning model can be developed and applied to other materials, even in other subjects.

Keywords


Blended learning, learning models, learning achievement, learning activities

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ada, M. B. (2018). Using design-based research to develop a Mobile Learning Framework for Assessment Feedback. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 13(3), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-018-0070-3

Ajilore, O. T., & Mphahlele, M. (2013). Web 2.0 technologies for teaching and learning mathematics subject in high school. A case study. 2013 2nd International Conference on E-Learning and E-Technologies in Education, ICEEE 2013, 48–53. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICeLeTE.2013.6644346

Alsalhi, N. R., Eltahir, M. E., & Al-Qatawneh, S. S. (2019). The effect of blended learning on the achievement of ninth grade students in science and their attitudes towards its use. Heliyon, 5(9), e02424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02424

Anderson, T., & Elloumi, F. (2005). Theory and practice of online learning. British Journal of Educational Technology (Vol. 36). Athabasca University. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00445_1.x

Barak, M. (2017). Science Teacher Education in the Twenty-First Century: a Pedagogical Framework for Technology-Integrated Social Constructivism. Research in Science Education, 47(2), 283–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9501-y

Belina, E. P., & Batubara, F. R. (2013). Perancangan dan implementasi aplikasi e- learning versi mobile berbasis android (Vol. 4). Medan: Singuda ENSIKOM.

Boelens, R., De Wever, B., & Voet, M. (2017). Four key challenges to the design of blended learning: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 22, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.06.001

Burkhardt, G., Monsour, M., Valdez, G., Gunn, C., Dawson, M., Lemke, C., & Martin, C. (2003). enGauge 21st century skills: Literacy in the digital age. North Central Regional Education Laboratory and Mitiri Group. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00602_10.x

Cahyana, U., Paristiowati, M., Savitri, D. A., & Hasyrin, S. N. (2017). Developing and application of mobile game based learning (M-GBL) for high school students performance in chemistry. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(10), 7037–7047. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/78728

Care, E., & Griffin, P. (2015). Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills. (P. Griffin & E. Care, Eds.). Dordrecht: Springe. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9395-7

Chatterjee, A., & Kothari, P. (2015). Bridging achievement gaps amongst school students through a technology-based blended learning model. Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, 2015-Febru(February). https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2014.7044249

Chee, K. N., Yahaya, N., & Ibrahim, N. H. (2018). An evaluation of the learning effectiveness of a formulated ideal social collaborative mobile learning environment application towards cognitive level in biology. Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 12(2).

Chen, C., & Jones, K. (2007). Blended learning vs. traditional classroom settings: assessing effectiveness and students’ perceptions in an MBA accounting course. J. Educ. Online, 4(1), 1–15.

Costa, C., Alvelos, H., & Teixeira, L. (2012). The Use of Moodle e-learning Platform: A Study in a Portuguese University. Procedia Technology, 5, 334–343.

Daud, F., & Arini, R. (2015). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Biologi Berbasis E-Learning Pada Materi Ekskresi Kelas XI IPA 3 SMAN 4 Makassar. Jurnal Bionature, 16(1).

Dey, P., & Bandyopadhyay, S. (2019). Blended learning to improve quality of primary education among underprivileged school children in India. Education and Information Technologies, 24(3), 1995–2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9832-1

Dowling, C., Godfrey, J. M., & Gyles, N. (2013). Do hybrid flexible delivery teaching methods improve accounting students’ learning outcomes? Account. Educ., 12(4), 373–391.

Faour, H., Hammoudeh, M., & Ghamdi, A. Al. (2012). Enhancing student learning experience and satisfaction using Virtual Learning Environments. 2012 International Conference on Education and E-Learning Innovations, ICEELI 2012, (July), 11–13. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEELI.2012.6360588

Griffin, P., Care, E., & McGaw, B. (2012). Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills. (P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care, Eds.). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5

Hardinata, R., Murwitaningsih, S., & Amirullah, G. (2018). Pengembangan Mobile Learning Sistem Koordinasi Berbasis Android. Jurnal Bioeduscience, 2(1).

Hay, D. B., Tan, P. L., & Whaites, E. (2010). Non-traditional learners in higher education: Comparison of a traditional MCQ examination with concept mapping to assess learning in a dental radiological science course. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 577–595. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602931003782525

Hilliard, A. T. (2015). Global Blended Learning Practices For Teaching And Learning, Leadership, And Professional Development. Journal of International Education Research (JIER), 11(3), 179–188. https://doi.org/10.19030/jier.v11i3.9369

Ho, V. T., Nakamori, Y., Ho, T. B., & Lim, C. P. (2016). Blended learning model on hands-on approach for in-service secondary school teachers: Combination of E-learning and face-to-face discussion. Education and Information Technologies, 21(1), 185–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-014-9315-y

Hurlbut, A. R. (2018). Online vs. traditional learning in teacher education: a comparison of student progress. American Journal of Distance Education, 32(4), 248–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2018.1509265

Ibrahim, N., & Ishartiwi. (2017). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Mobile Learning Berbasis Android Mata Pelajaran Ipa Untuk Siswa Smp. Jurnal Refleksi Edukatika, 8(1), 80–88.

Indit, R. (2012). Dasar teori respon siswa terhadap media video. Yogyakarta.

Kagohara, D. M., Van Der Meer, L., Achmadi, D., Green, V. A., O’Reilly, M. F., Mulloy, A., … Sigafoos, J. (2010). Behavioral intervention promotes successful use of an iPod-based communication device by an adolescent with autism. Clinical Case Studies, 9(5), 328–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534650110379633

Kazua, I. Y., & Mehmet, D. (2014). Effect of Blended Learning Environment Model on High School Students Academic Achievment. Journal of Educational Technology, 13.

Khlaisang, J., & Koraneekij, P. (2019). Open online assessment management system platform and instrument to enhance the information, media, and ICT literacy skills of 21st century learners. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(7), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i07.9953

Kintu, M. J., Zhu, C., & Kagambe, E. (2017). Blended learning effectiveness: the relationship between student characteristics, design features and outcomes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0043-4

Kranz, M., Möller, A., Diewald, S., Roalter, L., Beege, B., Meyer, B. E., & Hendrich, A. (2013). Mobile and contextual learning: a case study on mobile didactics in teaching and education. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 7(2), 113. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmlo.2013.055618

Kuswana, W. S. (2012). Taksonomi Kognitif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R. F., & Baki, M. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1–47.

Meishar-Tal, H., & Gross, M. (2014). Teaching sustainability via smartphone-enhanced experiential learning in a botanical garden. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 8(1), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v8i1.3441

Montrieux, H., Vanderlinde, R., Schellens, T., & De Marez, L. (2015). Teaching and learning with mobile technology: A qualitative explorative study about the introduction of tablet devices in secondary education. PLoS ONE, 10(12), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144008

Nazarenko, A. L. (2015). Blended Learning vs Traditional Learning: What Works? (A Case Study Research). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 200(October), 77–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.018

Ndlovu, M. C., & Mostert, I. (2018). Teacher Perceptions of Moodle and Throughput in a Blended Learning Programme for In-Service Secondary School Mathematics Teachers. Africa Education Review, 15(2), 131–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2016.1241667

Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 509–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.03.006

Nur, N. A. (2019). Factors Influencing Students’ Enthusiasm in Speaking Class. English Language Teaching for EFL Learning Journal, 1(1), 24–38.

Ogunleye, A. O. (2010). Evaluating an online learning programme from students’ perspectives. Journal of College Teaching and Learning, 7(1), 79.

Pevac, D. V., Milanovic, K. S., & Milosavljevic, M. M. (2005). E-learning Method Implementation in the High School Vocational Education. IEEE EUROCON 2005 - The International Conference on “Computer as a Tool,” 835–838. https://doi.org/10.1109/eurcon.2005.1630062

Porter, W. W., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. A., & Welch, K. R. (2014). Blended learning in higher education: Institutional adoption and implementation. Computers and Education, 75, 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.02.011

Prihadi, S. (2012). Model Blended Learning. Surakarta: Yuma Pustaka.

Raja, R., & Nagasubramani, P. C. (2018). Recent Trend of Teaching Methods in Education" Organised by Sri Sai Bharath College of Education Dindigul-624710. India Journal of Applied and Advanced Research, 2018(3), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.21839/jaar.2018.v3S1.165

Sardiman, A. . (2011). Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sari, A. R. (2013). Strategi Peningkatan Blended Learning untuk Peningkatan Kemandirian Belajar dan Kemampuan Critical Thinking Mahasiswa di Era Digital. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia, 11(2).

Shidiq, A S, & Yamtinah, S. (2019). Pre-service chemistry teachers’ attitudes and attributes toward the twenty-first century skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(4), 042014. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042014

Shidiq, Ari Syahidul. (2016). Pembelajaran Sains Kimia Berbasis Etnosains Untuk Meningkatkan Minat Dan Prestasi Belajar Siswa. In Seminar Nasional Kimia dan Pendidikan Kimia VIII (pp. 227–236). Surakarta: Program Studi Pendidikan FKIP UNS.

Shidiq, Ari Syahidul, Permanasari, A., & Hernani, H. (2020). Simple, Portable, and Inexpensive Spectrophotometers for High Schools Lab Activity. In Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR) (Vol. 438, pp. 150–154). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200513.034

Sudjana, N., & Rivai, A. (2011). Media pengajaran. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo.

Sukmadinata, N. S. (2012). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Syarif, I. (2012). Pengaruh Model Blended Learning Terhadap Motivasi dan Prestasi Belajar Siswa SMK. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 2(2).

Tee, N. Y. K., Gan, H. S., Li, J., Cheong, B. H. P., Tan, H. Y., Liew, O. W., & Ng, T. W. (2018). Developing and Demonstrating an Augmented Reality Colorimetric Titration Tool. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(3), 393–399. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00618

Terras, K., Chiasson, K., & Sansale, A. (2012). Mirror mirror on the wall, is blended instruction the best of all? Students’ perceptions of blending face-to-face and online instruction. The Journal of Special Education Apprenticeship, 1(1), 5.

Trianto. (2013). Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif Progresif. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Grup.

Triarisanti, R., & Purnawarman, P. (2019). The Influence of Interest and Motivation on College Students’ Language and Art Appreciation Learning Outcomes. International Journal of Education, 11(2), 130. https://doi.org/10.17509/ije.v11i2.14745

Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.

Valeriu, D. (2015). Factors Generating of Positive Attitudes Towards Learning of the Pupils. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180(November 2014), 554–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.159

Warnajith, N., Dassanayake, G., Dahanayaka, D. D. G. L., Tonooka, H., Minato, A., Ozawa, S., & Perera, M. P. M. (2012). Prototype of E-Learning Management System for secondary school in Sri Lanka. 2012 International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training, ITHET 2012, (Table 3). https://doi.org/10.1109/ITHET.2012.6246070

Yamtinah, S., Masykuri, M., & Shidiq, A. S. (2017). Gender Differences in Students ’ Attitudes toward Science : An Analysis of Students ’ Science Process Skill using Testlet Instrument. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1868(030003), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995102




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v8i2.17007

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Anda Juanda, Kartimi Kartimi, Dessy Indriani, Dindin Nasrudin


Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Science Education)

ISSN 2338-4379  (print) | 2615-840X (online)
Organized by Universitas Syiah Kuala 
Published by Master of Science Education Study Program Graduate School Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia
Website : http://jurnal.usk.ac.id/jpsi
Email     : jpsi@usk.ac.id

  

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.