Aktivitas Antibakteri Bakteri Asam Laktat (BAL) yang Diisolasi dari Saluran Pencernaan Itik Lokal Asal Aceh terhadap Salmonella pullorum dan Escherichia coli
Abstract
ABSTRACT. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat aktivitas antibakteri dari bakteri asam laktat (BAL) yang sudah diisolasi dari saluran pencernaan itik lokal asal Aceh. Berdasarkan hasil identifikasi gen 16S rRNA menggunakan metode PCR dan Sekuensing diperoleh lima BAL yaitu Lactobacillus plantarum strain C1; Pediococcus acidilactici strain V2; Lactobacillus fermentum Strain D3; Lactobacillus fermentum Strain I1; Lactobacillus fermentum Strain S4. Penelitian ini mengukur kemampuan aktivitas lima BAL terhadap Salmonella pullorum dan Escherichia coli yang dilakukan dengan difusi (teknik sumuran). Uji ketahanan terhadap kondisi asam (pH 2) dan ketahanan terhadap garam empedu (bile salt) dilakukan dengan metode Total Plate Count (TPC) menggunakan medium agar MRS metode pour plate. Hasil penelitian diperoleh bahwa Pediococcus acidilactici strain V2 memiliki aktivitas antimikroba terbaik terhadap bakteri Salmonella pullorum dan Escherichia coli. Pediococcus acidilactici strain V2 juga memberikan hasil terbaik pada ketahanan terhadap pH 2 dan garam empedu 1%.
(Antibacterial activity of LAB isolated from the digestive tract of a native Aceh duck of Salmonella Pullorum and Escherichia coli)
ABSTRAK. This study aimed to examine the antibacterial activity of lactic acid bacteria isolated from digestive tract of Local ducks from Aceh. Identification of the 16S rRNA gene using PCR and sequencing methods were obtained five LAB is Lactobacillus plantarum strain C1; Pediococcus acidilactici strain V2; Lactobacillus fermentum Strain D3; Lactobacillus fermentum Strain I1; and Lactobacillus fermentum Strain S4. This study measure the ability five BAL activity test against Salmonella pullorum and Escherichia coli by diffusion (well technique). Test of resistance to acid conditions (pH2) and to bile salt were using the Total Plate Count (TPC) method with MRS Agar medium by pour plate. The results showed that Pediococcus acidilactici strain V2 had the best antimicrobial activity against Salmonella pullorum and Escherichia coli. Pediococcus acidilactici strain V2 also gave the best results on resistance to pH 2 and 1% bile salt.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Afriani, N., Yusmarini, and Pato, U., 2017. Aktivitas antimikroba Lactobacillus Plantarum 1 yang diisolasi dari industri pengolahan pati sagu terhadap bakteri patogen Escherichia Coli Fncc-19 dan Staphylococcus Aureus Fncc-15. JOM FAPERTA. 4(2):1-12.
Agyare, C., Boamah, V. E., Zumbi, C. N, and Osei, F. B., 2018. Antibiotic use in poultry production and its effect on bacterial resistance. IntechOpen. Chapter 3. 33 -51.
Begley, M., Hil, C, and Gahan, C. G. M., 2006. Bile salt hydrolase activity in
probiotics. Appl Environ Microbiol. 73(3):1729-1738. DOI: 10.1128/ AEM. 72. 3. 17291738.
García-Hernández, Y., Pérez-Sánchez, T., Boucourt, R., Balcázar, J. L., Nicoli, J. R., Moreira-Silva, J., Rodriguea, Z., Fuertes, H., Nuňez, O., Albelo N and Halaihel, N., 2016. Isolation, characterization and evaluation of probioticlactic acid bacteria for potential use in animal production. Res.
Vet. Sci. 108: 125-132.
Guo, X. H., Kim, J. M., Nam, H. M., Park, S. Y, and Kim, J. M., 2010. Screening lactic acid bacteria from swine origins for multistrain probiotics based on in vitro functional properties. Anaerobe. 16:321-326. DOI:10.1016/j.anaerobe.2010.03.006
Hamida, F., Wiryawan, K. G, and Meryandini, A., 2015. Selection of Lactic acid bacteria as probiotics candidate for chicken. Media Peternakan. 38(2): 138 – 144. DOI: 10.5398/medpet.2015.38.2.138
Hidayat, M. N., Malaka, R., Agustina, L, and Pakiding, W., 2018. Characteristics isolate bacteria lactic acid of origin digestive tract of broiler as probiotic candidate for poultry. Inter. J. Sci. Engineering Res. 9.
Linharesn, L. M., Summers, P. R., Larsen, B., Giraldo, P. C, and Witkin, S., 2011. Contemporary perspectives on vaginal ph and lactobacilli. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 204(120):1-5
Markowiak, P, and Slizewka, K., 2017. Review Effect of Probiotics, prebiotic and sinbiotics on human healt. Nutrients. 9. 1021. DOI:10.3390/nu9091021
Mehdi, Y., Montminy, M. P. L., Gaucher, M. L., Chorfi, Y., Surech, G., Rouissi, T., Brar, S. K., Cot, C., Ramirez, A. A and Godbout, S. 2018. Use of antibiotics in broiler production: Global impacts and alternatives. Anim. Nutrition. 4: 170 – 178.
Negi, Y. K., Pandey, C., Saxena, N., Sharma, S., Garg, F. C, and Garg, S. K., 2018. Isolation of antibacterial protein from Lactobacillus spp. and preparation of probiotic curd. J. Food Sci. Technol. 55(6): 2011–2020.
Nuraida, L., Susanti., Palupi, N. S., Hana., Bastomi, R. R., Priscilia, D. and Nurjannah, S. 2012. Evaluation of probiotics properties of lactic acid bacteria isolated from breast milk and their potency as starter culture for yoghurt fermentation. Int. J. Food, Nutr. Pub. Health. 5: 33-60.
Nurjannah, S. 2014. Analisis Keragaman Bakteri Asam Laktat dari Saluran Pencernaan Ayam Cemani Berdasarkan Gen 16S rRna dan Potensi Penggunaannya sebagai Probiotik. Disertasi. Sekolah Pascasarjana Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor.
Parasthi, L. Y. E., Afifah, D. N., Nissa, C and Panunggal, B. 2020. Total lactic acid bacteria and anibacterial activity in Yoghurt with addition of Ananas comosus Merr. And Cinnamomum burmannii. Amerta Nutr. 257-264.
Risna, Y. K., Sri-Harimurti, Wihandoyo dan Widodo., 2020. Screening for probiotic of lactic acid bacteria isolated from the digestive tract of a native Aceh duck (Anas platyrhynchos). Biodiversitas. 21(7): 3001-3007.
Sivram, P. L. and Vishwanath, P. P., 2012. Assessment of probiotic potential of Lactobacillus sp. isolated from cheese and preparation of probiotic ice cream. IJRAP. 3: 20-25.
Sri-Harimurti and Hadisaputro, W., 2015. Probiotics in poultry. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland.
Tejero-Sarinena. S., Barlow, J., Costabile, A., Gibson, G. R, and Rowland, I., 2012. In vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of a range of probiotics against pathogens: Evidence for the effects of organic acids. Anaerobe. 18: 530538.
Van de Guchte, M., Serror, P., Chervaux, C., Smokvina, T., Emrlich, S. D and Marguin, M. 2002. Stress responses in lactic acid bacteria. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 82:187-216. DOI: 10. 1023 /A: 1020631532202
Widiasih, D. A., Drastini, Y., Yudhabuntara, D., Maya, F. L. R. D., Sivalingham, P. L., Susetya, H., Nugroho, W. S., Putri, M. T. K., Primatika, R. A, and Sumiarto, B., 2019. Detection of antibiotic residues in chicken meat and eggs from traditional markets at Yogyakarta City using bioassay method. Acta Vet Indon. DOI: 10.29244/avi.0.0.1-6.
Xie, Z. L., Bai, D. P., Xie, L. N., Zhang, W. N., Huang, X. H and Huang, Y. F., 2015. Intestinal lactic acid bacteria from Muscovy duck as potential probiotics that alter adhesion factor gene expression. Genet. Mol Res. 14(4): 12262-12275.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17969/agripet.v22i2.24297
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 0 timesPDF - 0 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal Agripet
License URL: http://www.jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/agripet/about/submissions#copyrightNotice
Copyright© 2000-2024 | ISSN: 1411-4623 | EISSN: 2460-4534
Jurnal Agripet is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Published by:
Animal Husbandry Department, The Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Syiah Kuala
associated with Animal Scientist's Society of Indonesia (HILPI).
Jl. Tgk. Hasan Krueng Kalee No. 3, Kopelma Darussalam,
Banda Aceh, 23111, Indonesia.
Phone: +62-81383736633
Email: jurnalagripet@usk.ac.id
Online Submissions & Guidelines | Editorial Policies | Contact | Statistics | Indexing | Citations